Question 1:A

Question 1: "Extra chair" refers to an easy life and worldly fame and fortune. Scoring standard: on the one hand, 2 points will be given for the content, and points will be deducted for the unsatisfactory answer.

Question 1: Thoreau's pure performance is that he likes simple life and hates fame and fortune. Madame Curie's noble performance is "away from the intrusion of personnel and the exaggeration of fame, and finally reached the peak of science." Scoring standard: 2 points for grasping the main points and answering them, and 4 points for * *. If the answer is incomplete, points will be deducted as appropriate.

Question 1: Open question. Example 1. Agreed. We middle school students have lofty ideals. In order to realize our ideals, we must concentrate on our studies. If you think about things other than fame and fortune too early, with these "extra chairs", the potential ratio is just like Tagore said, "flying is not high." Therefore, as a middle school student, we should also get rid of "extra chairs".

Question 1: test analysis: Thoreau's words quoted at the beginning of article B are truth rather than examples, and do not show the author's argument; The "chair" mentioned in item C is a kind of figurative rhetoric, which refers to life, which can be seen from the topic of "life is like a chair"; Item D is wrong in the case of "three famous people", Madame Curie is an example, and the other two are quotations.

Comments: When doing this kind of topic, you must read the full text, understand the author's point of view, and then read the paragraphs carefully, and measure them with the knowledge of argumentative papers.

Question 1: Analysis of test questions: According to the related statement in the article, "There are no extra chairs, so that they can stay away from the intrusion of personnel and the exaggeration of fame, and finally climb the peak of science and read another magnificent landscape of life", "Life is like a chair. If you delete the complicated parts, your life will be simple, concise, concise, rich and profound", which is not difficult to see.

Comments: When doing this kind of questions, we should grasp the sentences that have appeared in the words that need to be analyzed in the stem, analyze these sentences intensively, lock in the target answer, and then answer according to the requirements of the stem.

Question 1: analysis of test questions: after reviewing the questions, lock the answers in the second, third and fourth paragraphs first. From the second paragraph, "three chairs, one for self-sitting, one for increasing knowledge and one for laughing and joking", "If there are five chairs, one of them must be the seat of" fame ",and" profit "has swaggered in. For Thoreau, who lived a pure inner life, this was unbearable. " You can look at the specific content of Thoreau's purity and refine it. "In the third paragraph, taking Madame Curie as an example, especially in the fourth paragraph, there is a clear statement that Madame Curie is noble. The key is to find these sentences and extract the answers.

Comments: First of all, we must determine the scope of the answer, and generally go to the corresponding place where the question appears to find the answer; After locking the scope, read the corresponding paragraphs carefully, extract the relevant answers, and summarize the answers. Of course, if you can answer the original sentence, the original sentence takes precedence.

Question 1: test analysis: answer agree or disagree first, and then explain your reasons. Pay attention to the requirement of "connecting with reality" in the question stem when planning to answer. So let's talk about it in connection with ourselves and the reality of life.

Comments: This topic is open-ended, there is no unique answer, but it should be self-evident. Generally speaking, it is wise to answer yes and yes at the same time, because you can use some sentences in the original text to complete your answer. Of course, you can't copy it completely, but you should have your own language in it.