Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Comprehensive guidance on the application for the 2020 national civil service examination: how to grasp the "unity of opposites" relationship of materials in argumentative writing?
Comprehensive guidance on the application for the 2020 national civil service examination: how to grasp the "unity of opposites" relationship of materials in argumentative writing?
In many argumentative topics, the materials contain some contradictory keywords, such as fast and slow, virtual and real, new and old, big and small. These opposing keywords seem to be antagonistic, but their internal logic is not simple binary contradiction, but complex, pluralistic and dialectical. Therefore, for such a composition, we must find the contradictory direction in order to make a breakthrough and find the correct direction.

Only by grasping the law of "unity of opposites" can we break through the complicated materials as soon as possible and quickly capture the contradictions in the materials, so as to achieve the concentration and profundity of our thoughts. Reading materials, along the direction of unity and opposition, in-depth exploration of the reasons for the interdependence and struggle between the two sides of the contradiction, you can quickly grasp the main points of conception, such as the following materials:

The changes brought about by scientific and technological progress affect the whole world. Although any change takes time, the change brought by scientific and technological progress will gradually accelerate with the passage of time. Scientific and technological progress can help people solve many problems, but it is by no means omnipotent. Many problems are still outside the scope of technical solutions. Future scientific and technological progress will bring many new problems. Just as technological progress brought convenience to mankind in the past, it also caused environmental deterioration. We need to remember that it is people who dominate the future world, not technology and its development level.

We can clearly see that there are two contradictory views in the material. If we start from contradictions, we will fall into the trap of making decisions in the opposite contradiction of either or the other. Especially from the opposite of contradiction, it is easier to make ideas look thin. We can think from a single "science should be slower" or "science should be faster", that is, when our ideas are for or against each other, our ideas are not in line with the material's point of view.

If we proceed from the unity of both sides of the contradiction, we can treat these two viewpoints dialectically. The opposites of all contradictions cannot exist and develop in isolation. The existence and development of one side must be based on the existence and development of the other side, that is, fully tap the rationality of contradictions, strive to find the point of convergence between the two, and form a dialectical point of view. At this time, our idea can be "the development of science should not be too fast or too slow, but moderate", which is in line with the scientific progress embodied in the materials that has helped mankind solve many problems and many new problems.

It should be noted that starting from unity does not mean an ambiguous point of view. It must be based on a relatively unified and profound point of view, and it is impossible to "say that the public is right and the old woman is right", otherwise the central argument will be unclear.

Good teachers, good courses and good service.