1. Improper topic selection: the topic selection is too broad, lacking pertinence or inconsistent with the research direction of the tutor, which may lead the evaluation experts to think that the value and significance of the paper are not high.
2. The research methods are not rigorous: improper selection and application of research methods may lead to doubts about the reliability and validity of the research results.
3. Insufficient literature review: lack of in-depth understanding of the research status in related fields may lead to doubts about the innovation and academic value of the paper.
4. Poor data analysis and presentation of results: Improper data analysis methods, unclear presentation of results or unreasonable explanation may lead the review experts to doubt the quality of the paper.
5. The structure and logic of the paper are confused: the unreasonable structure of the paper, the unclear division of chapters or the confusion of discussion logic may make it difficult for the review experts to understand the core viewpoints and argumentation process of the paper.
6. Language expression and format problems: There are many grammatical errors, spelling errors or irregular formats in the paper, which may lead to negative impression of the peer reviewers on the overall quality of the paper.
7. Non-standard citation of references: the inaccurate or incomplete citation of references or the format does not meet the requirements may lead the review experts to question the academic level and rigor of the paper.
8. Insufficient communication with the tutor: Poor communication with the tutor may lead to a big gap between the direction and content of the paper and the expectations of the tutor, thus affecting the evaluation results of the paper.
9. Unreasonable time arrangement: The slow progress of paper writing may lead to the failure to finish the paper before the deadline, thus affecting the evaluation effect of the evaluation experts.
10. Lack of personal ability and experience: Due to the limitation of personal ability and experience, there may be obvious deficiencies in some aspects of the paper, thus affecting the evaluation results of the paper.