In recent years, in the annual professional title evaluation of primary and secondary school teachers, teaching papers are regarded as one of the conditions. Secondary vocational schools require one or two teaching papers and higher vocational schools require one or two. I dare not comment on whether this condition is appropriate, but the reality puzzles me. Among primary and secondary school teachers, especially in rural areas, although most of them have reached the standard in academic qualifications after continuing education, training and further study, the proportion of them who can write papers is not large, and even less can write good papers. Therefore, in the evaluation of professional titles, many teachers try their best to "prepare" their papers in order to pass them. If they have access to the Internet, they should find them online. If you can't surf the Internet, ask acquaintances and friends to help you write. Some "business-minded" people also seize the contradiction between policy and practice and teachers' eagerness to evaluate their posts, mobilize teachers to spend money on papers, or let them write their own papers, and then give them so-called publishing fees ranging from 2 to 300 yuan. They will collect these teachers' papers and publish them. When one party gets the money, the other party can evaluate their posts, which is really "win-win". In short, the sources of papers are diverse and there are fake papers everywhere. Imagine, can such a paper explain the true level of teachers? Is it still meaningful to use distorted papers as evaluation conditions? The annual professional title evaluation was announced again, and the teachers set off a discussion storm about the authenticity of the paper. Fake papers make it difficult for the judges to distinguish between true and false, but the teachers who work together know each other best. There are real papers and fake papers, which make teachers psychologically unbalanced. More importantly, it has fundamentally lost the original meaning of evaluating professional titles to promote the improvement of teachers' professional level! How to evaluate teachers' real professional level, whether to write papers or not, how to falsify papers in the evaluation, and how to curb the unhealthy trend of confusing the fake with the real, so that the evaluation of professional titles can develop along a healthy and orderly track, really should be paid attention to!