The so-called "task-driven composition"? It is named after computer terminology, and its essence is to add "task-based instructions" to the open and exploratory "new narrative materials" provided to candidates, requiring candidates to complete writing tasks according to the "instructions". Specifically, the "instruction" of the composition is three sentences after providing "new narrative materials": "What do you think of this matter?" "show attitude" and "explain views"
Second, the difference between task-driven composition and new material composition
What is the difference between "task-driven composition" and "new material composition" (providing open materials and deconstructing one-way meaning)? Generally speaking, "task-driven composition" is aimed at the events in the materials, "telling the facts, telling the truth deeply and thoroughly", telling the freshness, depth and temperature of things at multiple levels, and refusing to demonstrate the famous things and famous sayings at all times and in all countries (if you want to quote famous things, it will only be naturally generated in the form of sentences rather than paragraphs). In the past, the composition of new materials was written according to the structure of "quoting (quoting materials and putting forward opinions)-discussing (discussing materials and demonstrating opinions)-linking (associating famous things and strengthening opinions)-summarizing (summarizing the full text and reiterating opinions)". Even after refining opinions, it is inevitable to abandon materials and expand associations to demonstrate opinions.
Therefore, to put it simply, "task-driven composition" is to remove the association part of "new material composition" and ask candidates to tell a unique multi-level "truth" around "this matter" in the material to impress and convince readers. There is no need to recite "composition materials" in whole paragraphs. It can be seen that "task-driven composition" emphasizes the training of rational thinking and rational expression ability of candidates. This is also a reference and attempt to foreign college entrance examination compositions. For rural middle school students, this kind of composition is obviously more difficult than "new material composition", and it is easier to identify the thinking ability of candidates.
Third, how to write a task-driven composition?
How to write "task-driven composition"? I think it is similar to the way comments are written now, and it can be written in the structure of "quotation-discussion-conclusion". It abandons the part of "associating famous things" in "new material composition", but its discussion part is more complicated than "new material composition": the discussion of new material composition is a simple discussion and analysis material, while the discussion of "task-driven composition" needs multi-level and multi-dimensional original judgment and in-depth analysis to reveal.
Specifically, the beginning is an "introduction", that is, an overview of the freshness (novelty and uniqueness) of the materials and ideas put forward. The "discussion" in the middle (which can be divided into three paragraphs) means that the discussion is based on facts and is in-depth in layers (the arguments are clear and unique, and the explanations are reasonable). The ending "knot", that is, quoting famous sentences, summarizes the strength of the full text (quoting famous sentences, regardless of the proof so far).
For example, in the article "Correcting mistakes with mistakes is not a text", the central argument that "correcting mistakes with mistakes is not justice" is put forward regarding the incident that "men in black" kicked "spitting people" on the subway, which changed the concept that most people praised "men in black" as brave law enforcement, and the viewpoint was novel and original. Then, it analyzes the deep-seated reasons why people agree with Men in Black from multiple levels: people who spit are at fault first. "mistake first" has become a reason for violence and a weapon of self-sophistry. Finally, I return to the argument that the justice of "treating mistakes with mistakes" is the embodiment of revenge consciousness in primitive form and the retrogression of society. No matter who makes mistakes first, "treating mistakes with mistakes" is not the way out, and treating mistakes according to law is the key to social progress. The full text is complete, practical, profound and convincing.
Obviously, to write a task-driven composition, candidates need to cultivate independent rational thinking in their usual composition training. It can be said that high-quality composition comes from unique and profound thoughts, while unique and profound thoughts come from careful reading and thinking. Therefore, candidates may wish to pay more attention to some controversial social news and read more commentary articles when preparing for the exam.