The low settlement rate of civil and commercial contract cases is the bad influence of traditional handling habits. For a long time, judges have become accustomed to the state of court work at the beginning of the year and closing the case at the end of the year. This bad habit of closing the case before the year and relaxing after the year has affected the quality and efficiency of the trial to some extent. Second, the judge's subjective consciousness is not strong. The heavy trial tasks, coupled with the increasing pressure of letters and visits to maintain stability, make judges weak in efficiency awareness, tired of coping, satisfied with concluding cases within the trial limits, and some even drag their feet, affecting trial efficiency. Third, the trial management system is not in place. Although the courts at all levels have incorporated the balanced closing into the performance appraisal system, the departmental appraisal plays an obvious role in the leadership of the court and has little effect on the ordinary judges, which makes it difficult to implement the relevant measures of balanced closing. Fourth, the allocation of judicial resources is unreasonable. The contradiction between more people and fewer cases is prominent, and the proportion of personnel in comprehensive departments is large. Front-line judges, especially grassroots civil judges, are under great pressure, so it is difficult to mobilize their enthusiasm and initiative, and the number and quality of handling cases are uneven.