Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Write an argumentative essay with arguments, arguments and arguments at the end.
Write an argumentative essay with arguments, arguments and arguments at the end.
The parameter is your opinion.

Support your point of view on the basis of arguments.

An argument is an argument that proves an argument.

Argument, argument and argumentation are the three elements of argumentative writing. Parameters are the soul of an enterprise. It is said that the parameters of meat and blood are the arguments for bones to prove "what's wrong". The three parameters of the topic are closely connected, which will form a complete demonstration process. _

Elements of argumentative writing: arguments and arguments

Parameter: The parameter is what you want to annotate. The article expounds the viewpoints, viewpoints and positions that the author wants to express. When reading an argumentative essay, the first thing to do is to discover, refine and understand the arguments of the article.

Everyone's arguments, arguments and arguments are inseparable. Therefore, clear statement, conclusive argument and rigorous argument are the three basic elements of argument.

(1) The discussion of parameters, opinions or ideas, and the outline of the full-text role of the commander played by the soul of the argumentative paper are all open. Intentional statement is the premise of writing an argumentative essay. The requirements for argumentative arguments are as follows:

"That's right. The purpose of writing argumentative essays is to preach the truth, distinguish right from wrong, distinguish right from wrong, beauty and ugliness, and the differences between correct concepts are mainly.

Unique articles must clearly point out their own views, express their views unequivocally, so that readers can see at a glance.

3 tightness. Parameter expressions must be comprehensive, strict and impeccable, and no opportunity for disagreement can be given.

4 focus. Put forward a central argument in an article. The only complete article always revolves around a point. To be honest, to solve the problem, we need to focus on avoiding changing the previous text parameters or conceptual confusion after debating the words that convey the text.

⑤ profound. The document that puts forward the argument should be an insight into new things and reveal the essence of things in depth, rather than a general cliche, so as to convince readers more effectively and give people profound enlightenment.

When writing an argumentative essay, we should pay attention to the explanation of the central argument and sub-arguments. The central argument is the keynote of the full text from the perspective of discussion and plays a leading role in the article. Explaining the arguments of the central argument from the parameters serves the central argument.

Generally speaking, there are various forms, roughly as follows: first, the beginning of the argument; Second, the argument of the ending; Third, the proposition of the article; Fourthly, through the demonstration of the full text and the usual wording, there are two main ways to demonstrate the two main tasks, and then study them in writing.

(2) An argument is a statement used to prove facts and truth. So the parameters include factual materials and theoretical materials of truth, including both positive and negative factual materials, and factual data materials are one of them. What principles should be followed when choosing factual materials and theoretical materials?

For positive factual materials, the first is the principle of authenticity. If the parameter is true, it can be untrue, which is suspicious. The second is the typical principle. It is the choice parameter of materials, which can profoundly reveal the essence of things and is a widely representative requirement. There is a saying that there are often many reasons to prove it from different angles and different angles. However, in fact, among many parameters, there are always some best and most convincing arguments, which are typical arguments. In addition, we must follow the principle of novelty. When reading articles, people are easily attracted by innovative materials, and they are also easily disgusted with old materials. Therefore, when choosing factual arguments, we must follow the novel principle, rekindle old feelings, find the nearest one so far, and work hard on the word "new".

On the contrary, the role of factual materials is the principle. To discuss the truth, we should analyze it from many angles and choose the arguments of parameters from different angles. It is necessary to choose cathode materials. Judging from the things mentioned above, we should analyze things from the opposite angle, compare the pros and cons, and highlight the central argument. The supplement of cathode material can't be said to pass.

Principles to follow, scientific data. On the surface, the data are just a few simple numbers. In fact, it has rich connotations, and it is often the brilliant achievement of many workers' crystallization achievements, which embodies unremitting efforts, or the argument that people who introduce scientific data can enhance their influence is irrefutable.

The choice of theoretical materials is proved to be correct by classical theorists, famous axioms, scientific laws and well-known truths, so that the argument can be proved to be correct. For the theory of reference material parameters, the following principles must be adhered to: 5 * first principle. The theoretical materials cited on the basis of arguments must be definite, but *, whether citing the words of celebrities or citing the effect, we must first find out who is not the author. Confucius' words serve as a reference for others' words. If it is a reference source, please be sure to check whether it is original or not, and don't copy it wrong. It is a reference function, and the original content must be correctly summarized. Secondly, the principle of pertinence. The purpose of the reference theoretical materials is to serve the argument, and it is really not far-fetched and aimless empty talk. Third, the principle of extension. This is an accurate and suitable material parameter. It is not in this bin, but it can't be used as a reference for analysis, so it can't give full play to its role. The correct way is to refer to theoretical materials, and then make scientific inferences from the necessary theoretical materials, from which new meanings are derived and new ideas are generated, thus promoting controversial articles. In addition, there are simple principles. Refer to theoretical materials to prove the argument to be correct, further elaborate and deduce the point of view, and even your own statement.

(3) The demonstration process and method should prove the organic connection between parameters and form a unified whole. Argumentation method, generally speaking, is to put forward the theme first, and draw a conclusion through argumentation and analysis. In the process and method of argumentation, we should analyze some levels and some cutting-edge analysis and draw conclusions. Some people will ask questions that will lead to problems and argumentation.

The requirement of writing an argumentative essay is to make the reasoning clear and rigorous, and the penetrating power of logical reasoning is convincing regardless of parameters or refutation.