Summary: The writing of the discussion part is divided into four parts. Firstly, according to the experimental results, the key points that need to be emphasized are summarized.

Secondly, the experimental results are compared with those in the literature.

Thirdly, the significance and potential application of this research work are put forward.

Fourth, point out the limitations of this paper and the possibility of follow-up research.

The discussion part is the core part of a paper, and it is also the part that reviewers and readers must pay attention to, and it is also the purpose for readers to read an article. The good intentions of the title, abstract, preface and other parts are all aimed at guiding readers to read this part.

Therefore, the discussion part is also a part to show readers and peer reviewers their research level.

First of all, summarize your research from a professional perspective. This part must be consistent with the research results and research purposes, that is, the content of the discussion part must find a basis in the results.

Secondly, the conclusion of this study is explained. In order to highlight the scientific nature and reliability of the explanation, it is generally explained in comparison with other people's research and analysis.

Then, after explaining the conclusion, we should also explain the application value of this research, that is, what practical cost this research can bring to society or clinic.

In the end, due to the limitation of objective conditions, any research can't be perfect, and there will be some shortcomings more or less, or there will be some limitations in the research due to the limitation of the current level of science and technology. Be careful when describing this part.