Because it is undeniable that a considerable number of scholars and students publish their papers by their own skills, rather than by spending money to buy pages, but after all, the papers published in various journals at all levels can be described as "sweating like a pig", but the quality of most papers, whether editors or authors, or units or institutions that publish papers as a necessary condition, is well known.

Specific content:

In March, colleges and universities all over the country successively issued brochures on independent enrollment. In the "army" of publishing papers, a group of "recruits"-senior three candidates have suddenly appeared recently. The reporter's investigation found that nearly half of the 90 self-enrollment pilot colleges and universities listed "publishing articles or papers in journals" as one of the qualifications for self-enrollment. The paper trading market is "eyeing" the self-enrolled students, and some high school students do not hesitate to spend thousands of dollars to buy the layout of provincial publications, or even hire someone to write for them. This "stepping stone" of independent enrollment has become a link in the peculiar paper trading industry chain. (March 25, Beijing Youth Daily)

There is no doubt that there are experts in high school students, but for this age group, it is probably rare that a certain research can really reach the level of publishing a paper. Therefore, from the perspective of autonomous enrollment universities, it is reasonable to take the thesis as a reference project for admission or not. However, in the environment where many bachelors, masters and doctors are spending money to publish papers, it is really hard to say how many papers published by high school students are from their own hands and how many have really reached a certain level.

We can even imagine such an absurd scene, that is, a teacher who examines the applicant's materials in a self-enrollment university, and his articles are published in the same journal as the audited person-the probability of coincidence may not be high, but who can completely deny this possibility? What's even more ridiculous is that some people can get into famous universities by faking their papers-as long as they spend more money, their papers will be published in more "authoritative" journals.

Of course, such absurd things cannot be allowed to happen and exist.

The temporary solution is to veto the falsification of papers by one vote, that is, as long as someone is found to have falsified their papers, they will be disqualified from participating in independent enrollment immediately. If you are mindful, you won't take risks and you won't make mistakes again. After all, once a dishonest person benefits from his dishonesty, he will continue to be dishonest, and I am worried that he will continue to make fakes in the future. But the premise of one-vote veto is to effectively identify fraud. How to identify fraud without accidentally injuring those who have real talents and practical knowledge also tests the wisdom of self-enrollment universities.

The fundamental solution is that the relevant departments of the state standardize and rectify academic journals and seriously study them. Let the author of the paper fight for strength, innovation and academic research ability, instead of fighting for money and relationships. A real scholar may only publish one or two papers in his life, but one or two papers are enough to establish his position in the academic world; No matter how many papers are published in one's life, people who have no real talent and knowledge will not achieve much in the end except deceiving themselves and others. Therefore, more importantly, we must change the current tendency of only discussing papers-it is the worship of papers and the moral decay of academic journals that leads to the sinking of the sacredness of papers today, which leads to people's love and hate for papers.

Good measures, in a good environment, will play a positive role and make the environment better; Good measures, in a bad environment, may have a negative effect and make the environment worse. At present, academic journals are still in a state of chaos, which is tantamount to adding chaos to independent enrollment and making it worse. Apart from attracting more people to show their dishonest side, it will have no other effect except increasing the income of some academic journals. Let's not get involved in this matter for the time being.