At a class meeting, the students discussed about "learning to be a man, I think honesty and intelligence".

Answer: Honesty means honesty and trustworthiness, and cleverness means mechanism and acumen.

Honesty and cleverness can have both for a person.

C: Honesty is another kind of cleverness. Smart is not necessarily smart.

Write an article of not less than 800 words from the angle of your own choice, with your own title and style, and you must not copy or copy it, and write it in standardized Chinese characters.

A brief comment on Xie Mingbo, a famous Chinese teacher in college entrance examination.

Honesty is another kind of cleverness. It is not new for people to say that losing is a blessing, but the truth contained in it is full of great wisdom. For this kind of material to express opinions, we should start with ideas. There are at least as many references as there are opinions. Student C's viewpoint is the most dialectical and worth writing.

[Original title: 20 15 Sichuan College Entrance Examination Composition and Excellent Composition Comments by Famous Teachers]

Read the following text and write as required. (60 points)

At a class meeting, the students discussed about "learning to be a man: I think honesty and intelligence".

Answer: Honesty is honesty and loyalty, and cleverness is wit and keenness.

Honesty and cleverness can have both for a person.

C: Honesty is another kind of cleverness, and cleverness is not necessarily true cleverness.

…………

Please write an article of not less than 800 words according to the above materials, real life and your own thinking.

Requirements: ① Self-made topics, self-made ideas and self-selected styles; ② No plagiarism or interplanting; (3) write in standard Chinese characters.

Analysis:

This year's college entrance examination composition in Sichuan is still a material composition, following the old path of "small materials, small philosophy and deep thoughts" in Sichuan papers in recent years. There is more room for autonomy, but it is more difficult. The argument about "honesty" and "cleverness" in "being a man" in composition materials is to test students' cognitive ability and discriminating ability, which belongs to speculative material composition. The different interpretations of "honesty" and "cleverness" in the materials are to guide candidates to think, not just three interpretations. Candidates should pay attention to the ellipsis at the back, which contains infinite content and is a reflection of the relatively large free space.

The proposer has no tendentious attitude towards three or more interpretations, and can have countless writing contents, but no matter what he writes, he must return to honesty and intelligence. The title of this seemingly material composition is actually a speculative composition with the title of "honesty and cleverness".

What kind of judgment should "honesty" and "intelligence" make? This is not an either-or question, nor is it a static question.

The "cleverness" in materials should be distinguished from "true cleverness" and "false cleverness", "great cleverness" and "little cleverness". Only short-term practices, quick success and instant benefit, practices that harm the interests of others, and practices that harm the collective and the country for personal interests cannot be called true cleverness and great cleverness. There are several levels here: individual, collective, society, country and nature. The positive point between these levels is really smart, which is the positive energy advocated by the society now. This well reflects the educational effect of college entrance examination composition.

The "honesty" here is not the embodiment of cowardice. Defined as dedication, honesty, no loss, diligence, responsibility, principle, indifference to fame and fortune, and adherence to the bottom line.

When examining questions, we should also give consideration to speculation and reality. Because the quotation outside the material is "combining with real life and thinking", the composition is close to society and students' reality, so that all candidates have something to say. This is the true embodiment of "people-oriented". Guide students to think about life and society and establish a correct outlook on life and values.

Therefore, only turning to the writing style of the ancients can't satisfy this year's composition. The strong realistic orientation shown in the test questions is very clear, which requires candidates to pay attention to real life and real society.

When examining questions, we should first grasp the key sentence: "Learn to be a man", which is related to doing things, so that honesty and cleverness can not stop at the usual evaluation of people, but judge what is cleverness through things, and then our thinking will be opened. You can write anything and jump out of the trap of composition design-only writing around "honesty" and "cleverness".

It seems that it is not difficult to review the topics in this material, but it is not so easy to write a successful composition.

Therefore, candidates can write "growth", which is counterproductive. It can be regarded as "smart" at first, but from the whole life, it is not really smart. It can be regarded as "sincerity" at first, but it is actually great wisdom in essence.

You can write both positive and negative contents mentioned above, and it is best to guide them to places you are familiar with.

This year's material composition is realistic and speculative, and candidates can quote many materials. As long as their brains are wide open, they do a good job of deduction and write it out, it is not a problem.

Reference idea: 1, the highest realm of wisdom is honesty, and honesty wins the world.

2. Cleverness and honesty are two completely different styles of doing things. Cleverness can help yourself and others understand the world, forge ahead, be honest and upright, make interpersonal relationships harmonious, skillfully handle and punish the relationship between them, and make a person's life and career better.

Composition model essay

You may be too smart.

Author: Song Yue

Which is better, cleverness or honesty?

Everything is cathode and yang, anode and yin; The decline is extremely prosperous, and the prosperity is extremely declining. It is not good for a person to be too smart. Yang Xiu and Wang Xifeng, for example, are typical examples of "being too clever to be mistaken".

First of all, Yang Xiu's chicken ribs

To say that Yang Xiuzhi died unjustly, we must first look at Yang Xiu's cleverness in The Romance of the Three Kingdoms:

First, one day, people built a new garden for Cao Cao. After Cao Cao read it, he posted a word "live" on the door of the garden, and neither side understood its meaning. Yang Xiu said, "Add a movable type and the door will be wider. This is because the Prime Minister thinks that the door is too wide and should be removed. " After Cao Cao learned about it, although he liked it on the surface, he was jealous in his heart.

Second, Cao took the Chinese and took it. When he was in a dilemma, Cao Cao gave the order of "chicken ribs" that night, and Yang Xiu called the sergeant, packed his bags and prepared to return to China. When Xia Houdun asked about it, Yang Xiu said, "Chicken ribs are tasteless, so it's a pity to give them up. If you can't win today, it's no use quitting. It is better to go back early. " So all the troops are ready to pack. When Cao Cao heard about it, he was furious and immediately ordered someone to take him out and behead him.

Yang Xiu's cleverness lies in that he can guess the master's mind, but he was killed because of his cleverness. Cao Cao has many advisers and many generals. People like Cheng Yu and Guo Jia are not inferior to Yang Xiu in their talents, but they can restrain their desire to express themselves and keep their cleverness in their hearts, which makes them look honest, but in fact, they are still stupid.

Second, the calculation of search

The verdict of A Dream of Red Mansions: The authorities were too clever to kill Qingqing, only Rainbow Xifeng. It should be said that she won the appreciation of Jia Mu and Mrs. Wang, as well as the respect of the late students and the servants. "You have a good chance to change the world. You can talk well." "I'm afraid I have ten thousand mind's eye, and want to gamble. Ten talking men can't beat her! " "He is an out-and-out mud-legged bachelor liar, specializing in careful calculation." "People all over the world ask you to calculate." "A sweet mouth is bitter, and the yang disobeys the yin."

Searching for such a smart person turned out to be a person, physically and mentally exhausted to death, and finally found nothing. Her hard work and her "heart and soul" were exchanged for Jia Gui's dissatisfaction with the servant, which didn't make Jia's family any better in the end. In the end, she died of grief. Isn't this the answer to "cleverness is outwitted by cleverness"

Wang Xifeng only knows how to make progress and doesn't know how to forgive others. He only knows how to benefit others at the expense of others, but he doesn't know how to butter. On the contrary, Li Wan was not vigorous and did not work hard, but in the end she was very popular. His son's success and frankness everywhere are actually "rare and confused" wisdom.

Third, the postscript

In fact, in the final analysis, are Yang Xiu and Wang Xifeng really smart? Really smart people seem to do things in a muddle, regardless of temporary gains and losses, personal interests and short-term goals. For the sake of my ideal and long-term goal, I can endure all loneliness and loneliness.

Su Shi named his son Su Cuo in the hope that his son would not appear too clever. And Zheng Banqiao's "Rare Puzzlement" really hit the nail on the head.

Fan wener

In society, "honest people" are often eliminated, while those who are smart and will change according to different situations are always like a duck to water, just like trees and cedars in the snow, with different endings in the same environment.

2 1 century, society is becoming more and more changeable, and people are becoming more and more realistic. In this modern and dynamic society, there seems to be no place for honest people. People will change, and the body, face and thoughts are more important than the soul. In this busy society full of opportunities and darkness, human nature has been completely affected. In the past, people were required to be hardworking, honest, capable and hard-working. As long as this is the case, they can survive well. Nowadays, people are required to be hardworking, intelligent, loyal, cunning and have dual personalities. Be honest in front of your own interests and treacherous in front of the interests of others. The development and evolution of the world is so fast that no one can keep up. Many honest people have been eliminated, and the nature of honest people has become dispensable. The most important thing is cunning, smart and adaptable. Sometimes even if you are cunning and changeable, as long as you can seek benefits, this society will have a place for you to stand.

What position does this leave for those honest people? The world is cold, and the social circle no longer needs honest people. It needs not only benefits, but also benefits!

No matter what I think, I don't think we should lose the simple and kind nature of people in the sixties and seventies. That's the foundation of being a man handed down from generation to generation by our elders, but it's completely changed here! This makes us feel very embarrassed! We can measure and change, but our nature is unchangeable! Of course, we can also change this stupid honesty. Honesty doesn't mean that you do what others tell you to do. I think honesty is: you can think for yourself, do what you want and stick to your point of view, but the premise is correct. Being smart and knowing how to do things is the basis of keeping pace with the times, but I don't do things for profit or money. I will be myself and never be a stupid honest man at the mercy of others!

Others say Zhuge Liang is worthy of respect, dedicated his life to Liu Bei and his son, and finally went to Shu, but why do I think he is a stupid honest man in my mind? If he is moved by Liu Bei's pity, then he is loyal and grateful, then I agree that he is a person who knows how to repay others, loyalty and gratitude. Fortunately, Liu Bei is also a wise king. However, Liu Bei has a disappointing son. Zhuge Liang followed (Dou) after Liu Bei's death, but Dou had no talent for governing the country. Sure enough, as his nickname says, he only knows how to have fun, and he is a helpless dou. I agree with Zhuge Liang's talent, but no matter how talented he is, he will be pushed down by people who are more scheming than him because of his stupidity. It was because of his honesty that he ended up like that. If he can be very cunning, he can manage this country by himself, let Adou study by his side, or support him all his life, and Shu will not perish. Just because of fear of worldly people's eyes and gossip, and because of his ignorance, a country disappeared like this. Sometimes being honest is a mistake. I don't think honesty is stupid loyalty or filial piety. I want to protect the people I love, the place I love and the country I love, not stupid honesty. I saw a lot from Zhuge Liang. I want to say: there are many ways to follow. Why do you have to suffer yourself and others?

What I want to do is an honest man who is different from them. Although I have a plan, although I will adapt, although I will change myself because of the different environment, it is only a way for me to survive and find a place for myself. I will still be an honest man who loves his family and patriotism but is not stupid, loyal and filial!