Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - The second of the five elements of paper writing: readability
The second of the five elements of paper writing: readability
Above: One of the five elements of thesis writing: innovation.

Pay attention to innovation when writing papers. In fact, we should also pay attention to this point when artificially losing weight and revising papers.

Next, I will talk about it.

The second of the five elements of paper writing: readability

The readability of scientific papers is very important and should be highly valued by the author. Readability is determined by the following factors: 1. Whether the research work has made substantial progress, whether the conclusions drawn are reliable, whether the results are profound and enlightening, if they are phased results, what is the guiding significance for subsequent research, and whether they are a prelude to important discoveries. If the research work has not achieved phased or final results, you should not start writing a paper. Boring research work can't write a good article anyway, so it can't be a readable article. 2. The author should make a complete conception of the paper and reflect strict logical thinking. When a research topic gets a result through long-term efforts, it should be as meticulous and meticulous as an artist's conception of a work. The way of discussion, content and materials, the exposition of academic ideas and the introduction of research background of the paper need to be scrutinized repeatedly, so that the conclusion of the paper can be rigorous, the content can be enriched, the discussion can be complete and the logic can be rigorous. If we can't do this, it will be difficult to arouse readers' interest in reading. 3. In the way of discussion, we should be simple and clear, concise, accurate and consistent in professional terms and standardized in language. Vivid. 4. Appropriate combination of words and illustrations. A considerable number of papers in China still have some shortcomings in vividly explaining the direction of academic content with pictures and tables. With the popularization of computer three-dimensional visualization, the trend of using color pictures and 3 d images in the paper will increase, which can avoid too much text description and achieve better results. 5. Stylistic format of the paper. Although each journal has formulated stylistic requirements that can reflect its own style and characteristics, generally speaking, academic journals have stylistic requirements, which are familiar to readers, but not many people really follow them seriously. The author may seldom think about such a question: why should academic journals put forward stylistic requirements? This is not something that can be treated at will. Style not only ensures the standardization of the form of the paper, but also ensures the readability of the content, which is exactly ignored by many authors. The title, abstract and keywords of the paper basically determine whether the paper can be adopted by the journal and whether it can arouse readers' interest. Chinese physics Letters, an excellent journal that has entered the scientific literature index, has repeatedly stated that this journal pays special attention to the titles of articles. The purpose of writing abstracts is to improve the citation rate of articles. The title should clearly describe the content of the article. It can also reflect the difference with other documents. As for the abstract, first of all, it is required to briefly describe the theme, field and research object of the article. More importantly, the stricter requirement is to describe the theoretical or experimental results, conclusions and other meaningful viewpoints of the article clearly, clearly and concretely. It can be seen that these three can make the finishing point on a paper. A common problem in some domestic papers is that they like all-encompassing, big and empty titles. An algorithm solves a NP problem, and so on. The listed keywords can not reflect the central theme of the paper, and it is not easy to search, which leads to readers' no interest in reading any more. From this, how to talk about the readability of essays? Please see how Nature explains readability in the second article of the submission guide: the manuscript should be written clearly and concisely. So that readers in other fields and readers whose mother tongue is not English can understand. Basic but professional terms should be explained concisely, but not didactic. Before submission, it is often useful to ask colleagues engaged in other disciplines to express their opinions on the clarity and understandability of the final manuscript. Editors of Nature often suggest revising and rewriting the abstract and the first paragraph (introduction) of a paper. And make sure that the articles and pictures are clear and readable for readers who are not in this field. This clearly shows how important the readability of the paper is. It is usually useful for Nature to provide clear and understandable opinions. Editors of Nature magazine often suggest revising and rewriting the abstract and the first paragraph (introduction) of the paper, ... and ensuring that the articles and pictures are clear to readers who are not in this field. You can read. This clearly shows how important the readability of the paper is. Nature has repeatedly stated that the final decision on whether to use the paper belongs to the editorial department. Any manuscript that does not meet their requirements needs to be rejected without in-depth reading. There is a simple reason. In the case of a large number of contributions, it is impossible for an editor to spend too much energy and time dealing with a manuscript with poor readability. Speaking of the readable part, it reminds the author of a memorable event that is widely circulated in the field of mathematics. At the beginning of this century, Hilbert was famous for putting forward 23 mathematical topics. What does he mean by one or three good math problems in the world? Hilbert replied without hesitation: When walking with you in the morning, he can let the first pedestrian you meet explain the math problem in 10 minutes. It's concise and clear. Understandability is the basic condition of a paper. Of course, Nature and Science are not professional magazines, and it is understandable to pay special attention to the readability of papers. So, professional journals don't have to take readability seriously? In fact, a readable article means that after reading your article, readers can understand what problems you want to say and how to solve them. It is not necessary for readers to fully understand all the contents of your paper. Therefore, professional journals also require papers to be readable. If a paper loses many readers because of poor readability, it will have a serious negative impact on the journal itself.

Recommended reading:

One of the five elements of thesis writing: creativity