Of course, we can't criticize this idea when we can reflect on what caused it. I think the key is the management and assessment of civil servants. Civil servants, civil servants, as the name implies, are people who serve the public. Since you are a service person, you should realize that serving the public is fundamental. There should be strong competition like other service personnel, with gains and losses. Restrain everyone through strict and scientific management and assessment, so that they can fully realize that becoming a civil servant is not a safe for drought and flood, nor is it the threshold for upgrading and upgrading.
The "official" is not in charge of people, but in charge and entrusted with custody. By who? It is the people, it is the common people.
In fact, many people are competing to apply for civil servants. I think it's not a happy event, but a bad one. How can I put it? You think, first, more people tend to benefit, so many people apply for the exam must mean that there is something better here than anywhere else. Where are you? At the very least, even if you are the worst clerk in the future, you will be very happy. If you have something to do, you can read the newspaper and surf the Internet. Without the fierce competition from other parts of the city, people give themselves a bunch of smiling faces when they come to work, and they speak softly, which makes them feel aloof. And the salary is better than other places, not to mention more. In this area, it is only medium, and with other gray incomes, life is of course comfortable. If things are not done well, they will only be scolded by the leaders. As long as you don't make big mistakes, the probability of unemployment is almost zero. So is it worthwhile for us to think about and reform the management style of civil servants, introduce a competition mechanism similar to market competition into civil servants, so that the mediocre, mediocre and greedy will be eliminated immediately, and introduce a sense of crisis into civil servants, so that every civil servant can correctly understand the essence of civil servants. Can we, like the United States, establish that if we want to make money, we should not be civil servants, and if we become civil servants, we should not expect to make money? I think corruption will be much better (can't be said to disappear) only if the enjoyment of making money is separated from civil servants. Secondly, it shows that the employment environment in China is not optimistic. Employment is difficult, and it is not generally difficult. Third, it shows that the rights and interests of ordinary workers in China have been illegally trampled and deprived to a great extent. From the social welfare alone, it can be clearly seen that all kinds of welfare benefits of civil servants are the best, and all kinds of social benefits required by the state can be fully realized, and even some units will go beyond the scope stipulated by the state. When it comes to ordinary workers at the grassroots level, there are very few enterprises that can fully perform, and many of them are coping in disguise or resorting to policy loopholes. In addition, the supervision of relevant government departments is not in place, or some local departments just turn a blind eye to these situations, so grassroots workers enjoy welfare and have extravagant hopes. Coupled with low wages, heavy workload and fierce competition, of course, everyone wants to take the civil service exam. Examining civil servants is the best way to get out of the misery at present. Fourth, this world difference between civil servants and grass-roots workers will also bring about the intensification of social contradictions. Social fairness and justice cannot be implemented. Fifth, when everyone is proud to be an official, the social values will be distorted, which is not conducive to the establishment of an innovative, scientific, positive, equal, just and struggling society. Nobody wants to go to business, industry, agriculture, etc. Will such a country and nation progress and develop? The history of China for thousands of years shows that we only worship officials, not businessmen, which leads to our decline, our backwardness and beatings, and our practice of the West for decades. We can't go this old way. Sixth, when the vast number of highly educated human resources are thinking about officialdom, who will develop the fields of science, technology and culture? Besides, how many positions can you set up? Because the social and cultural atmosphere depends on it, those who can't enter the officialdom or want to develop in science and technology and culture will be disappointed and turn to foreign countries. Isn't this the environmental background that causes brain drain? Therefore, changing the priority is to be an official, and brilliant success is the social atmosphere of being an official. Time waits for no one!