Some journals have to go to the final review before they can be accepted. The editorial department is sorting out the external audit opinions. If the good results are returned to you, if the papers are strictly audited, it will be a good thing, which will help improve the quality of the papers, but it will be annoying to refuse. This will consume the author's limited time, for example, papers that should be published before the time node will be delayed, which will affect the author's degree and promotion. In addition, if the manuscript is not within the knowledge of the editor, you can also choose to refuse to process the manuscript. Even if an academic paper is well written, academic editors will be rejected if they are unwilling to deal with it. 2. The evaluation of external audit recommendations is low. In China, academic editors usually have more than two experts in charge of external review of papers. It can be said that if the paper passes the external review, the chances of being hired are higher, but it does not mean that it will be hired, because there are editors who are final.

After receiving the manuscript, external review and final review, it was finally rejected. The employment rate of these two foreign companies is generally high. So far, no paper has given sufficient reasons for being rejected because of repeated submission. If the quality of some papers is really good, but compared with other papers, they are not so consistent with the periodical positioning, then they may be rejected in the final review. What I want to say is that the external audit before the final review only represents "outside the journal".