Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - May I ask why the first three chapters of Wen Xin Diao Long (The Original Way, The Collection of Sages and the Collection of Classics) advocate that literature should be based on Confucianism?
May I ask why the first three chapters of Wen Xin Diao Long (The Original Way, The Collection of Sages and the Collection of Classics) advocate that literature should be based on Confucianism?
For example, Julian Waghann himself rewrote A Discussion on the Position of Wen Xin Diao Long in the History of China Literature, reviewed the opinions of Zong Rao, Shi Lei and Lu Kanru, and agreed with Sister Liu's opinion on the History of China Literature Development. His book "Studying China and India, Going in and out of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism-Reading Notes on Wen Xin Diao Long" was written from his family life before he believed in Buddhism, with Confucianism as the main theme. His book "Studying China and India, Going in and out of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism-Reading Notes on Wen Xin Diao Long" was written from his family life before he believed in Buddhism, with Confucianism as the main theme. He also made a detailed examination of his teacher, You Monk, and helped to sort out the Tibetan scriptures for more than ten years and three large-scale proofreading processes of Buddhist scriptures. He also made a detailed examination of his teacher, You Monk, and helped to sort out the Tibetan scriptures for more than ten years and three large-scale proofreading processes of Buddhist scriptures.

Exploring the origin of Liu Xie's literary theory from Confucianism and Taoism, Huang Jin Shu said in "Literary Mind Carving Dragons: The Ideological Origin of Literary Theory" that the word "Wen" originally meant "learned article" (not based on Wen); The Han Dynasty was a vassal of Confucian classics. Cao Pi's Dian Lun Wen endowed it with a new historical position. The paper gives it a new historical position. Liu Xie inherited the Confucian concept of practical literature in the Han Dynasty, integrated the transcendental intuitive world view of Taoism, reconciled Confucianism and Taoism, and used it for the other side, and drew a conclusion:

The harmony between Confucianism and Taoism has become the criterion of literary theory criticism in the future, because Confucianism is the direction of life and Taoism is the realm of improving life. These two factors are the basic conditions that literature must have. The harmony between Confucianism and Taoism has become the criterion of literary theory criticism in the future, because Confucianism is the direction of life and Taoism is the realm of improving life. These two factors are the basic conditions that literature must have. Cao Pi's Dian Lun, represented by Cao Pi's Dian Lun, became a systematic work, while Liu Xie's Wen Xin Diao Long was a masterpiece. The paper is the representative, and then becomes a systematic work, while Liu Xie's Wen Xin Diao Long is a masterpiece.

Huangshi is an expert in Confucianism and Zhuangzi. From these two viewpoints, the source of literary thought in Wen Xin is the most convincing. Huangshi is an expert in Confucianism and Zhuangzi. From these two viewpoints, the source of literary thought in Wen Xin is the most convincing.