Why do many candidates feel that the exam is good, but their scores are above 30?
According to my experience, there are two main reasons.
First of all, the exam questions are unclear.
Some candidates write down in a hurry after reviewing the questions. I hope you take the time to answer them. In fact, it is not worth the loss to lose your car and keep handsome.
Please summarize the main problems summarized in a minister's speech in the article.
Some candidates take it for granted to summarize the theme of the full text, or the general idea of the full text. I forgot the key word "a minister" in the summary of the topic requirements. It's a pity to lose points.
This is the most common in the last article.
For example, combined with reading materials, how to treat electric bicycles forbidden on the road in some cities, choose your own angle and draw up your own tender.
Write an argumentative essay to explain your point of view. Requirements: clear-cut, fully demonstrated, clear-cut, and fluent in language.
Within 800- 1000 words.
Some candidates, without looking at other people's requirements, hastily wrote a syllogism on how to solve the problems caused by electric vehicles.
Off topic, Wan Li. Obviously you were asked.
"What do you think of the prohibition of electric bicycles on the road in some cities?" So what do you think of Jin Dian's measures? Are they advantages or disadvantages? As long as you write down your own views and then demonstrate them, so as not to stray from the topic, the basic point of the article will come. A little polish is a good article, how can you not get high marks!
Therefore, when you study application, you must form the habit of carefully examining questions. If you talk for a few more minutes and see what people ask, you should answer them. Don't form the bad habit of answering questions.
Next, let's talk about the skills of answering questions.
The objective question about the application is also a minor problem.
There is no trick to summing up the problems. You can only practice often, so as to improve your ability to extract the main idea of the article and get into the habit of commenting on each main idea of the article, which will help you answer the summary questions. At the same time, we should pay attention to generalization, including summarizing the main contents and summarizing the main problems, which are all included in the main contents. It depends on the content of the article, such as the various problems mentioned in the whole article. It is quite impossible to summarize the content at this time. If the article still uses a certain length to talk about how to solve the problem, it is not only a summary of the problem, but also a summary of how to solve the problem.
Regarding the decision-making category, first of all, you should find out the problems reflected in the article, so as to propose solutions to the problems, but the countermeasures should not be big and empty, but must be feasible, that is to say, the countermeasures should be practical.
Generally speaking, the countermeasures should be like this.
For example, a department, such as the relevant education department, if it is really unclear, write down the relevant government departments, then do what, and then achieve what. You'd better add a subtitle in front.
Example: Improve relevant laws and regulations (subheadings). The relevant education departments (departments) should improve the laws and regulations of compulsory education in China (how to do it), so as to realize the legal basis for education fees (results).
Regarding the final paper, there are actually the following writing structures.
First: carefully examine the questions.
Be sure to read the requirements of the topic clearly, see what the question is, don't answer it in a hurry, and decide whether to write an explanatory article or a policy article according to the requirements of the topic.
Second; How to write the title;
The theme must contain your central idea. Such as perfecting the social security system and promoting the implementation of Scientific Outlook on Development.
This topic makes the marking teacher understand that your argument is the role of improving social security in promoting Scientific Outlook on Development.
Another example is; Speaking of Scientific Outlook on Development, this won't work. Without a central argument, your next argument can't be developed.
So be sure to include the corresponding relational logic in the topic.
Third: Start.
The first paragraph at the beginning explains the present situation, problems and key points.
That is to find the corresponding sentences from the article, and explain the present situation, existing problems and shortcomings after processing and integration. About 100 children.
The second paragraph. Tell you a little trick, using "although this (problem) is closely related to China's (actual national conditions, etc.). ) objective reasons, the root cause lies in waiting. " You can use this structure flexibly, and then use it to about 100 words.
In the third paragraph, then we need the principle of () and how to do it specifically in the following aspects. . . .
For example, in line with the principle of governing for the people, strengthen the improvement of relevant laws, increase market supervision, and improve the corresponding joint law enforcement system, which is embodied in the following aspects. . .
The fourth step: the writing of sub-arguments.
First of all, explain the current situation and existing problems (2-3 sentences)
Second, write a sentence or two about fundamental (such as endangering the legitimate interests of the masses) and theoretical (such as violating the development concept of governing for the people)
Third: What strategies should be adopted to solve the problem (2-3 sentences)
Fourth: the significance of doing so; (2-3 sentences)
Note: If it is a strategy paper, you need to increase the proportion of strategies.
If it is not strategic, write every argument according to this.
Fifth: the end
Conclusion: the article's long-center argument+strategic principle+meaning is solved in 2-3 sentences;