Analysis of test questions: In the face of relational questions, we should first analyze the relationship between several concepts appearing in the questions, and the focus of examination and conception should be on revealing the internal relations between concepts. Relational topic composition should not only highlight the relationship between them, but also highlight the key points, distinguish the main and secondary aspects of contradictions, be good at grasping the key points keenly, dare to highlight the key points, and achieve the unity of two-point theory and key theory. For example, the words "rigidity" and "softness" in this topic are obviously opposite and juxtaposed, and should be conceived from the perspective of their close connection or praise or criticism when writing. We can use divergent thinking to diverge into "combining rigidity with softness", "combining rigidity with softness" and "abandoning weakness for strength" If we choose rigid or flexible reasons, we can spread dignity, for justice, for repaying kindness, for rising up, etc. From the close relationship between rigidity and softness, we can think that "rigidity" is a noble integrity, a firm belief, an indestructible will and an unshakable perseverance in achieving great achievements and dealing with people; "Softness" embodies people's good self-restraint, characterized by being down-to-earth, flexible, hard-working, patient and meticulous; If we use praise and criticism to explain the truth of "combining rigidity with softness" or "softness can overcome rigidity", we can think that "rigidity" is arrogance and stubbornness, then "softness" is humility and flexibility; On the other hand, if you think "rigidity" is straightforward strength, "softness" is hypocrisy and cowardice. With these ideas, determine the style and connect with specific examples, it is easy to write an article.

Comments: Common misunderstandings in the examination of topics and opinions in relational topic compositions;

Myth 1: Grasping one point is not as good as the rest.

Since it is a relational topic composition, it is necessary to focus on the relationship between the two relationships within the topic when reviewing the topic, which involves two points and finds a breakthrough between them. One of the most common mistakes that our candidates make when examining questions is to separate the connection between the two, and to talk about one point in writing, but ignore another point, which leads to digression and digression.

Myth 2: Generalize the relationship and ignore the key points.

When writing relational argumentative essays, we must avoid falling into a general proof of the relationship. It is necessary to concretize the relationship first, and then demonstrate it as an argument. The article should conform to the "what-why-how" structural model, and pay attention to typical arguments and argument levels to avoid flattening. Some candidates discuss relationships in their writing, which eventually leads to the article falling into a general and empty mud.

Myth 3: Start a new stove or change the subject.

In the face of relational topic composition, no matter how you write it or from which angle, you should take all the concepts that make up the topic into account according to the actual situation and clarify the relationship between them. Never start a new stove or change the topic because the relationship is unclear, so as to avoid the inevitable connection between elements. We must make a scientific explanation from the viewpoint of dialectical materialism, and we must never make the relationship absolute, so that the expression is excessive and inaccurate.