Nowadays, information means are more and more developed, and people's reading speed is also significantly improved. You can browse the high-quality content written by a person in a month in a few minutes, but the profit brought to the author is really minimal. Fragmented reading makes the article begin to depreciate. What people need is cultural fast food instead of elaborate ivory towers, so many authors don't want to sit at their desks and study. What they did was of little value anyway. Might as well go fishing in the sea.
A high-quality article does not come out of thin air. It has to be revised many times to make the arguments and arguments of the text impeccable and stand up. However, people who read the article don't care about this, and even some people can say it after reading a comment at the beginning. No one cares about whether there are enough arguments behind the article, and they are not in the mood to read it. So this concept will be marketed to the value orientation of text suppliers, and no one will be willing to spend time doing nothing.
For text suppliers, it's only when a sheep is bald that it's over. This is the maximization of benefits. So when there is any hot spot, the whole network is full of one thing, knowing that it can no longer stimulate the excitement of users. Of course, there have been some speculations, always for the benefit.
It takes too long to create a high-quality article, and it is very difficult to obtain first-hand information, so the best way is plagiarism. In order to seize the time, the article will not be done too well or too badly, and then the second wave will be reprinted in an hour or two, then the third wave and the fourth wave will make this matter known to everyone, and finally some carefully crafted articles will come out. These are all done with heart, but the best traffic point is missed, so the income is not as good as others. In the long run, these high-quality authors will naturally get hurt.
There are also some high-quality articles that will be plagiarized, because creating these contents requires a lot of professional knowledge and careful thinking, but the time cost is too high, and the text providers naturally don't want to wait, so plagiarism is almost inevitable. Many internet companies hire some newly graduated novices to copy and reprint articles crazily, as long as the traffic goes up.
The reason why plagiarism can be so unscrupulous is also related to the lack of effective checks and balances. It is difficult to impose heavy penalties on these people and it is impossible to serve as a warning. Moreover, the major information platforms also need these people to support the scene, so the parasitic relationship of mutual protection is formed, which is very complicated.
It is difficult for high-quality authors to monitor the plagiarism of their articles in real time. Once they sue, they will spend a lot of experience. From investigation and evidence collection to trial, it is easier to make a person collapse than to write a paper. It is difficult to determine who started the game, who reprinted it for the first time, and who reprinted it. Many small companies run away as soon as they go to court, and they get nothing. When the original author sues, it is possible to achieve a collective boycott of Daimonji suppliers. After all, the power of public opinion mastered by these people is terrible. Many people talk about money, even if you are just, you will drown in your spit.
Since the media platform and text providers are mutually beneficial and win-win, the platform hopes to have more content to ensure users' reading, and text providers need more distribution channels, so many times the platform acquiesces in plagiarism, as long as it is not too serious, it will not be dealt with directly, but this matter cannot be optimistic, which is an unspoken rule of the industry. Of course, various platforms are also encouraging more high-quality output, but it is difficult to keep up with the reading speed of users, so it is really helpless to compromise with text providers. In the final analysis, readers are actually one of the executioners.
To solve this problem, we need stricter original protection laws and regulations, and then encourage more original content to reverse this social atmosphere, otherwise, this chaos will continue. But now there have been some improvements. After all, readers are not fools. After watching a content a hundred times, they will never pay again. The road to original protection has a long way to go, and the process will be very painful, so do it and have a look.