Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Steps of answering questions in argumentation thinking
Steps of answering questions in argumentation thinking
The answer steps of argumentation ideas include: example argumentation, reasoning argumentation, comparative argumentation, etc.

Illustration: By citing specific examples, the demonstration will be more specific and convincing. Answer format: take (summarize examples) to prove (if there are sub-arguments, write down the sub-arguments, otherwise write down the central arguments) to make the arguments more specific and convincing.

Reasoning argument: Prove the argument through reasoning, making the argument more universal and in-depth. Answer: Using the method of rational argument, it is proved that in order to make the argument more general and in-depth. Note: quoting famous sayings, aphorisms and authoritative data can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Citing anecdotes of celebrities can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to continue reading. Answer format: Use the argument method of quoting arguments to prove that the arguments are more convincing. (or more interesting to attract readers to continue reading).

Comparative theory: the role is outstanding. Question form: Through comparative argumentation and highlighting future research.

Metaphorical argument: truth is easy to understand and accept. Make the argument more vivid and more conducive to readers' understanding. A: We compare them by metaphor, which proves that in order to make the abstract and profound truth vivid and easy to understand.

Demo functions mainly include:

Argumentation structure, argumentation method, argumentation thinking and argumentation skills. The characteristics of argumentative writing refer to the basic structure of argumentative writing, which consists of introduction, theory and conclusion. Generally speaking, the introduction is the beginning, the theory is the theme and the conclusion is the end. In other words, you must put forward a topic or argument at the beginning, and choose materials for the main part to make a separate argument.

Causality is more dialectical and logical. The mutual transformation of things under certain conditions is a very common phenomenon. For example, in the field of ecological balance, there is a wide causal relationship. To analyze the causal relationship between two things, we should not only indicate the relationship between the two things, but also explain under what conditions cause and effect will be transformed into each other.