This is the moral value of a fait accompli recognized by China. For thousands of years, we have been following such a value system, and regard the concepts of unity and mutual assistance, respecting the elderly and caring for the young, and honoring our parents as the fine virtues of our Chinese nation. However, in the face of the commercialization of social forms, the spiritual quality that we call good virtues like this is increasingly marginalized. It is true that there is a phenomenon in society that people are kind enough to help others but lose money, so some negative public opinion will always be exposed, so it is possible to be noble. But even so, can the school find an excuse to discuss that the elderly don't need help when they fall? What was the result of the discussion? Is it necessary to discuss if you want to help? You know, helping others is a fine tradition that we have advocated for thousands of years. Everyone has received this kind of ideological and moral education since primary school. This is a fait accompli. As a school, it certainly teaches students the excellent ideas and concepts of our country for thousands of years. What it teaches children is, of course, positive and correct life values. Teaching and educating people is of course the unshirkable responsibility of the school. There is such a negative phenomenon in today's society. Shouldn't we spread learning to respect the old and love the young and honor our parents? According to this logic, should we discuss whether to accept that kind of ideological and moral education? I don't deny that this phenomenon exists in today's society, but it is only a few cases. We can't refuse to help others and deny our good moral values just because we don't accept those good ideas in some cases. Helping the elderly fall is only socialization, and schools should not be affected by this socialization, so such topics are only suitable for discussion in society, and discussion in universities is a paradox. If even the basic common sense question of "should the old man be helped when he falls down" can be discussed in universities, then "should the old man be given his seat by bus" should be debated? Should public places litter? Should public places spit everywhere? Should students debate swearing? ..... According to this kind of thinking logic, there are too many things discussed in the university, so what is the significance of the ideological and moral concepts learned before? This discussion about "whether the old man should be helped when he falls down" is itself a contempt and subversion of our excellent Chinese culture for thousands of years. In essence, it is to question whether there is a problem with our socialist morality. Even if others help the old man and finally compensate him for his losses, although his personal psychology is unbalanced, his original intention of helping the old man is good and does not violate our moral values, but he can still exude the truth, goodness and beauty of human nature. On the contrary, we can better understand the complexity of the society and further understand the society, so this is the authenticity of the society, but we can't deny the significance of this kind of help, let alone think that this kind of help is wrong. Perhaps in this immature social stage, it only shows that there is still a gap between the comprehensive quality of our citizens and that of foreign countries. It is undeniable that this phenomenon may still be reflected in the current social stage. Because the national quality level is not very high, it is normal to encounter such a situation, but I believe that with this profound understanding of ideological education, people's ideological consciousness will continue to improve, and there may be no discussion about whether the old man should be helped when he falls. Theoretically speaking, there is no need to discuss such a topic, but the problem of eating dumb loss frequently occurs in society, becoming more and more prominent and becoming a social pathological condition, so that universities now have caught a cold, lost their basic ability to distinguish facts and cognitive ability, and complicated simple problems at once. It can be seen that this virus has very strong penetration and transmission. Speaking of the topic "Should the old man be helped when he falls", it suddenly reminds me of a very simple truth. Maybe our classmates often encounter such a situation at school. If you stand behind a classmate to fetch water, then it will be just the two of you. The classmate in front suddenly left in the process of opening the water, but the cup was still under the water pipe. He didn't tell you, or he may have forgotten to tell you. But when you see that his glass is almost full, will you turn a blind eye to the overflow of his glass or help him take it off? The normal person's answer is to take the cup off. At this time, there is no reason to take the cup off. Although no one has told you that you need help, the water in the cup has formed a conditioned reflex to you, suggesting that you need your help. This kind of suggestion needs no sound, no language, only the subconscious behavior of the brain. Because we know that water overflow will waste more water resources, which is a habitual behavior and a matter of course. Every student will basically follow this situation. Therefore, there is no need to discuss such a problem as a public topic. It is just a joke to outsiders and becomes the laughing stock of others.