Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What is the role of leading science?
What is the role of leading science?
Leadership is a new discipline born in 1930s, also known as modern leadership science. Since the 1980s, there has been a new trend in the study of leadership theory, which is adapted to informationization, new economy and globalization. If leaders want to do their own management well, they need to make full use of scientific leadership art, treat problems dialectically with the concept of economics, analyze and deal with problems, and then achieve the best management effect.

1. The important role of leadership science in management work

The key to leading science lies in scientific decision. Scientific decision-making refers to the choices and decisions made by leaders in the future actions of organizational groups by using scientific thinking methods, and they are revised and improved in the implementation process to achieve the best results.

1. 1 Whether a leader makes a scientific decision is the key to the success of his career. Making strategic goals for career development is itself a major leadership decision that determines the success or failure of the career, and decision-making mistakes are the biggest mistakes. Practice has proved that the correct leadership decision can lead all the work to be carried out smoothly, make new achievements continuously, and make the whole cause flourish; Wrong leadership decisions will lead to great setbacks or losses, and even the decline of the whole cause. Therefore, the correctness of leadership decision-making is a major issue related to the overall direction and goal, and it is a decisive factor that determines the success or failure of the whole cause.

1.2 Whether leaders make scientific decisions is an important basis for determining the direction of leadership behavior. Leadership decision-making and leadership behavior are closely related and interdependent: decision-making is the choice of behavior, and behavior is the implementation of decision-making, and they are interdependent. Therefore, leadership decision-making is an important basis for determining the direction of leadership behavior.

1.3 Whether a leader makes a scientific decision is the key to leading activities. There are many functions of leadership, but the most basic or primary function is to make leadership decisions. All leaders, regardless of level, system or industry, are decision makers at different levels or ranges, and all participate in or implement decision-making to some extent. Decision-making and implementation of decision-making are the most basic contents of all leadership work. Leaders must participate in the whole process from the proposal of decision-making objectives to the formulation and selection of plans, and then to implementation. We measure the level of a modern leader, not by how hard his work is, nor by how many things and people he is in charge of, but mainly by his decision-making level and ability, and by his political achievements and achievements.

2. Analysis of the causes of decision-making mistakes caused by unscientific leadership behavior

If leadership science cannot be effectively applied to management, its direct consequence is leadership decision-making mistakes. There are many reasons:

2. 1 is superior to others, resulting in decision-making mistakes. Decision-making can generally be divided into three levels: high-level, middle-level and grassroots. Middle-level decision-making is between high-level decision-making and grassroots decision-making. This connecting position and function determines that middle-level decision-making should be based on high-level decision-making to ensure the implementation of high-level decision-making.

2.2 Arbitrary leadership leads to decision-making mistakes. Modern leadership decision-making is a very complicated system engineering. Only by fully developing democracy and relying on science and technology and the experience, experience, intuition and judgment of decision makers can scientific decision-making be made.

2.3 Unhealthy emotions lead to decision-making mistakes. Emotion is the expression of human emotion, which is subjective and random. A person's emotional stability is relative and fluctuation is absolute. Stable and healthy emotions have a good influence on decision-making, while restlessness and extreme emotions have a great influence on decision-making mistakes. Leaders make decisions with emotions and follow their feelings, which often leads to decision-making mistakes. Usually some decision makers clap their chests and say "I am responsible for this" is a typical reflection of emotional decision-making.

2.4 Lack of rational thinking ability leads to decision-making mistakes. After the decision-making has developed from the traditional empirical decision-making to the modern scientific decision-making stage, the rational thinking ability of leaders has an important influence on the quality of decision-making. Modern decision-making technology uses a series of scientific theories, methods and means to make qualitative and quantitative analysis of decision-making objects. It emphasizes that every condition on which it is based is not allowed to be subjectively fabricated, but must conform to the objective truth. Therefore, in the decision-making process, we must put the collection of facts in the first place. Scientific decision-making has both principles to follow and no fixed model, which requires decision-makers to learn to transform scientific knowledge into rational thinking ability and use decision-making skills flexibly.

2.5 rely on intuitive ability to make mistakes. Intuition is a method characterized by multi-directional thinking and taking incomplete logic as the operating step of thinking. It is helpful to pay attention to the integrity of things, form the creativity of decision-making and improve the efficiency of decision-making. If we only rely on the intuitive ability of leaders, it is easy to make our understanding divorced from reality. Only by organically combining scientific decision-making with intuitive decision-making can we make up for their respective shortcomings and help to realize scientific decision-making

2.6 decision-making mistakes caused by insufficient decision-making ability. Theoretically speaking, the correct decision depends on finding out the facts completely. However, it is usually impossible to find out all the facts. To seize a good decision-making opportunity, we must show our due decisiveness and firmness in making decisions on major issues. A leader who is indecisive, vacillating and indecisive at major issues and critical moments will never win.

3. Leading the effective use of science.

By analyzing the characteristics of leadership decision-making, the root of leadership decision-making mistakes and the ability factors that affect the quality of decision-making, we clearly realize that starting from reality is the basis of leadership scientific decision-making. In order to realize the decision-making of leaders, we should proceed from reality, and leaders should pay special attention to the following three aspects:

3. 1 Improve the quality of leaders themselves: First, improve the political and ideological quality. Leading cadres should first talk about politics, establish a correct world outlook, stand clearly and firmly on the position of the working class and the masses in making decisions on major issues, and serve the people wholeheartedly. Secondly, we should have a dialectical scientific thinking method. In practical work, we should correctly understand and handle the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity, cognition and practice, leaders and the masses, individuals and collectives, break old rules, break through old experience, open up new ideas and lay a solid foundation for scientific decision-making. The second is to have a good psychological quality. Free paper net. Psychological quality is a comprehensive reflection of physical strength, intelligence, ability level, personality temperament and other factors, and it is the result of personal long-term psychological activities. The third is to improve the scientific and cultural level. Without scientific thinking methods, we can't correctly observe and deal with problems. The general situation of scientific culture in the process of leadership decision-making is that the higher the level of scientific and cultural knowledge, the deeper the understanding of objective laws, and the easier it is to achieve the unity of subjective and objective. Free paper net. The fourth is to cultivate compound talents. Leaders are the main body of leading decision-making activities, and the quality of leaders directly affects or even determines the effect and success of decision-making activities. Fifth, be good at making decisions and dare to be responsible. Decision-making is the decision and judgment made by leaders directly on non-normative events and major issues according to their own knowledge and experience. Only by being fair and upright, being good at decision-making and daring to be responsible can we not delay the opportunity, avoid or reduce mistakes and win the support and support of the broad masses of the people.

3.2 Accumulate experience with the help of the external brain. The first is to go deep into grassroots investigation and research. Free paper net. Investigation and research is the beginning of leadership work and a basic skill of leaders. Only by in-depth investigation and study can we know the truth and seek a solution to the problem. The second is to sum up and accumulate practical experience. The rich practical experience of leading cadres plays a very important role in decision-making, which is the basis for forming a correct understanding and the condition for improving cognitive ability. The third is to strengthen the construction of think tanks. Decision-making is a science, a leadership art and a creative application of decision-making scientific theory. The competition in modern society is, in the final analysis, the competition for talents. In the era of knowledge economy, the leader's own brain is far from being able to cope with the rapidly changing world and must rely on the "external brain".

3.3 Establish decision-making procedures and improve systems and systems. First, establish and adhere to strict decision-making procedures. Leadership decision-making is a process, and the decision-making process needs strict procedures to control in order to produce scientific decisions. The general procedure of leadership decision-making is usually divided into eight stages: defining the problem, determining the goal, drawing up the scheme, optimizing the scheme, examining and approving, formulating the detailed scheme, guiding the implementation, and feedback the modification. The second is to improve various systems and systems. The leading decision-making subject not only refers to the leading individual, but also includes the groups involved in decision-making. China's state system and polity are scientific as a whole, but there are still many defects in some specific systems and systems. Therefore, we should conscientiously implement the spirit of the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, accelerate the pace of political system reform and the building of democracy and legal system, and provide favorable guarantee for leading scientific decision-making by reforming and perfecting various systems and systems.

Nowadays, the world has entered an era of knowledge economy characterized by socialization of production, marketization of economy and globalization of information. "Qian Fan strives for development, while hundreds of obstacles struggle for flow". Traditional empirical decision-making has become increasingly unsuitable for the requirements of new social development and will be replaced by modern scientific decision-making. Only by establishing scientific leadership concepts and mastering scientific leadership methods can we continuously improve the level of leadership and realize scientific leadership.