Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Can anyone publish a paper in the 1990s?
Can anyone publish a paper in the 1990s?
Not everyone can send it. In the past, 1990 and 1992, the school issued two papers, and the prizes were really small. This also caused colleagues to discuss the publication of the paper. "The master is in the people", even in primary schools with few papers, there is a discussion about "not just papers". It can be roughly divided into academic school and practical school.

Academic opinions, papers are not important, but quotations are important. 1992, the general branch of the department called some teachers to discuss their opinions on the department head. An old teacher who didn't know seemed very excited and said, "The director always said that we didn't have any papers. What's the use of that paper? Someone has to quote. " I was young and lacking in inclusiveness. This sentence is quite contemptuous of my little buddy "I" in Kong Yiji. "Is a beggar worth testing me?" Without papers, how can people quote them? Because I went abroad, I actually slandered the dean. But I didn't say anything at last, and I didn't want to stand with the old teacher. Academically, what the old teacher said is not in place. Citation is not enough. There should be positive comments, especially from authoritative sources.

From a realistic point of view, the thesis is not important, but the research project is important. In the early 1990 s, there were few fund projects, and there were basically no schools like Steel Institute. So the so-called project is actually a horizontal project. A professor in the department of chemical engineering relayed others' comments on green peppers, saying that he "had a paper but no scientific research." The yield of green pepper is higher. 1990, first-level papers 1 paper, 6 or 7 second-level papers. If I remember correctly, he later went to Jilin University to study for a doctorate, and now he is a professor at a key university in Changchun. Tell me that the professor said disapprovingly, "what is this?" Without scientific research, then come to the paper? " The professor has a general project of natural science foundation, which was unique at the steel research institute at that time. I understand. Just now, the commentator said that there is no scientific research project for green peppers. It is really the primary stage of research, and after a few years, it will enter the normal stage of "having papers and projects". By the way, I think "having a topic without a thesis" is also the primary stage of research, which is not necessarily better than "having a thesis without a topic", and of course it is not necessarily bad.