Under normal circumstances, sci papers will receive opinions or suggestions from peer reviewers when they are withdrawn. After receiving the opinions, the author should first look at the reasons and suggestions for withdrawing from the course, and see whether to accept the opinions of the reviewers according to the reasons and opinions, because not all the opinions and suggestions of the reviewers are correct.

If the revision opinions put forward by the reviewer are correct, the author needs to make amendments according to the revision opinions and reply to the reviewer. Note: If there are some minor modifications and adjustments, it is relatively simple for the author to modify them and can be modified directly; If you need to make some major adjustments and modifications, especially about the structure or data of the paper, the author should think carefully before modifying it. After all, the structure of the paper is very complicated and there are a lot of data. If it is revised hastily, it may lead to more confusion in the structure or data of the paper.

After the revision is completed, the revised paper needs to be submitted to the reviewer, who will review the revised place again after receiving it. If the modification effect is not achieved, it will continue to be withdrawn until the reviewer is satisfied.

In addition, if you feel that the revision opinions given by the reviewers are unreasonable, you can question the reviewers and give convincing arguments or arguments to prove that your ideas are right.