When examining bi-2536 with anti-proliferative activity, we found that the compound strongly inhibited the growth of plk 1wt cells, but had little or no effect on plk 1as cells (Figure 1 2). In order to determine whether to change the inhibitor bi-2536 with unique efficacy, we used Plk 1 inhibitors with different structures to carry out similar growth challenge experimental environment. Thirdly, we have observed that plk 1as cells are significantly different from their counterparts in gene plk 1wt (digital integrated circuit, development). In order to understand the depth and breadth of drug resistance of inhibitors, we asked about various readings and activities in the body. PLK 1 needs to be in the whole mitosis, good function, centrosome maturation, bipolar spindle assembly, stable attachment of active microtubules, and start cytoplasm. All these procedures proved to be qualitative and quantitative for two plk 1 targeted inhibitors. For example, plk 1as cells continue to recruit γ -tubulin (the basic expression of centrosome maturation) and centrosomes of bi-2536 (Figure 2) and Tal (Figure B) existing in bipolar spindles. Similarly, the ability to over-phosphorylate Bubr 1 (a key factor, stable attachment of active microtubules) was not impaired, which was reflected in the continuous flow transfer electrophoresis of peptides such as BubR 1 (Figure 2). According to this extensive defect, these two compounds cause mitotic arrest of PLK 1G (but not plk 1as cells). Look at their circular appearance and phase contrast microscope (Figure 4).