1. Determine the argument. Arguments are usually put forward in the first paragraph of an article. 2. To have sufficient arguments, you can cite examples from your life. This argument should be strictly logical. All facts, reasons and reasons should be closely related to the conclusion. 4. The level should be clear. 5. Sincere and friendly attitude, because the argument focuses on being reasonable and convincing. Argumentative writing focuses on discussion, but sometimes it also uses explanation, narration and description. The explanation in the discussion often creates conditions for the discussion, or supplements the discussion; Narration and description in argumentative essays should provide basis for arguments. Therefore, the narrative should be general and the description should be brief. 6. The arguments should be sufficient. In order to prove your point, you must have sufficient evidence. The author can list facts, show data and provide examples, and use common sense or experience more than results: Eight years ago, I graduated from a normal college and became a Chinese teacher in my second hometown, Aksu, a small border town; Three years ago, I left the forum with a faint unbearable feeling and went to work in a state-owned enterprise. People's attitudes towards such a change are completely different, and even I have been worried about such a choice for a long time. I often go back to the school where I worked for six years, and I often see my former colleagues. What they often say is "Xiao Zhang, going out is much better than this. Yes, schools are becoming more and more places for people to do things. " I can only respond with a noncommittal smile. When I return to my present office, my colleagues will also ask, "Xiao Zhang, I regret coming. I really can't figure out how you came up with the idea of transferring to this unit. How good the school is, there are holidays and no tasks, alas! " I can only respond with an unquestionable smile. Why a choice made three years ago is still so sensitive. I don't regret my choice, but there is always something stuck in my throat that makes me speechless. I think this is a strange phenomenon caused by different occupations and people's comparison psychology. In fact, in my mind, these two occupations are not comparable. Teachers are relatively simple, except that teachers in the same trade are students, and people in enterprises are people from all walks of life. In order to live, people have to change themselves to adapt to society. As teachers, they must hide the socialization, secularization and commercialization of human nature and give children a pure world. Being in an enterprise is another life situation. Faced with the pressure of life, you should be a "thousand hands" and "ten thousand catties of oil". Simple-minded people will inevitably be infected by social habits. These are two different lifestyles, and now my colleagues will accuse me: "How simple it is to stay in school, and how good it is that there are not so many messy things in society." Colleagues at school will also say, "You are much more mature than before, and staying at school is really getting more and more stupid." Is that really the case? I think the orientation of this profession is an endless "besieged city" dialogue between people in different workplaces. No one should think that he can decide the world in one sentence. When a person changes careers and enters his dream industry, he finds himself starting this seemingly practical but meaningless argument again. Confucius saw two children arguing whether the sun was bigger in the morning or at noon, and the boy laughed at him. In fact, he was confused by it in Kong Old Master Q Q. The sun is always about the same size, just because people have different illusions under different feelings, so is the workplace. In fact, the nature of work in all walks of life is the same, and they all have to work hard. The difference is that these labors have brought many different things to people and made people have different understandings of labor. My wife has been very supportive of my work. Only my elderly parents often miss my job and often ask me where my salary is high and where I can relax. I can answer the first question naturally, but I have to spend some saliva on the second question. I won't explain much when I look at what they don't understand, because the best interpreter is to evaluate the quality of the work. You regard work and labor as a means to make a living or a way to realize your self-worth, but you must understand that work and labor are actually a process, and learning to enjoy this process is the most important thing. Just like love, the process is far better than the result. Now, if someone asks me similar questions, I can tell them clearly. In fact, there is no difference between the quality of work and the quality of labor. The key is to look at a person's mentality and see from which angle you look. If you only talk about the results, the psychological impact on yourself will be "people are more irritating than others", but if you can look at your career dialectically, you will find a lot of fun in your work.