1. Species depend on genes, but genes do not evolve at all. Different individuals will have different genetic codes, but the differences will never go beyond the scope of species. The descendants of tigers will always be tigers, and no lions will be born, even though they are all cats. Although the genes of humans and chimpanzees are very similar, it is said that they are 99% similar, but that one percent is absolutely impossible to cross species boundaries.
2. What "evolved" naturally is actually an occasional "cross-species" alien (such as a two-headed snake), which is rare in a hundred years, and most of them are extremely fragile and belong to inferior products. Reality will not "evolve" into a perfect alien like Godzilla. What's more, there are few aliens who don't meet in a hundred years, and even fewer can reproduce. Even the mules artificially cultivated consciously can't produce small mules now! What's more, accidents in nature.
3. "Aliens" that can reproduce (evolution) must appear at the same time, and there must be a considerable number (and a male and a female) in the same place to reproduce. That is to say, a male deer that occasionally evolves into a neck must find a female deer with the same degree of evolution in its lifetime to "evolve". In order to ensure that future generations will not "die prematurely" due to gene mutation, at the same time,
4. In the process of evolution, the fossils of "intermediate" species are almost blank. Don't tell me that "Beijingers" are human beings, and they are simply extinct apes! And there is nothing to prove that "Beijingers" have created any civilization that conforms to human IQ. Has anyone seen the fossil of a half-nosed elephant? Or a giraffe fossil with half a neck? Or did trilobites evolve into middle fossils of fish? In the theory of evolution, animals evolve layer by layer, so the fossils of species faults should be all over the world. It happened that fossils have no intermediate links! Fossils show that species are independent and irrelevant! This is an evolutionary mistake! Do we believe in the hypothesis of evolution and ignore the tangible fossils?
Moreover, early creatures (such as dinosaurs) have nothing to do with modern creatures. Because the earth has experienced several glacial extinctions, except for a few plants, animals are basically extinct, which greatly shortens the cycle of each "evolution". After each extinction, from the perspective of evolution+probability transformation, the emergence of new creatures must be hundreds of millions of years later, and the earth should have died for hundreds of millions of years: it is a miracle that new creatures do not die (because there is no food), and it takes hundreds of millions of years to evolve new races, and it will take several years to spread all over the world. The above is just a lucky species. There will be a process from scratch to more species. But the reality is that in a very short time after the earth's recovery, a large number of new creatures (thousands of species) miraculously "suddenly appeared together"-fossils as evidence!
6. If the theory of evolution is true and evolves layer by layer, then there should be no fixed species in the world. It should be very vague between species, and the world is full of specious things. We should see different forms from tadpoles to frogs, and the people around us are full of various forms from monkeys to people: much like monkeys, a little like monkeys; Very human, a little human, because evolution is accidental, not at the same starting line, some people will evolve faster, and some people will almost evolve. That's what Hitler thought.
How can 6 billion humans evolve together? No one with a long tail looks like a monkey, and no one continues to evolve. Who controls the evolution of mankind?
7. The evolutionary convergence of the same species is incredible because they live in different environments. According to the theory that the environment changes species, the species in the equator should be similar, and the species in the Arctic should be similar, and the environment determines everything. But on the contrary, dogs on the equator must be like dogs on the North Pole, not monkeys on the equator. Today, human beings are all over the world. Supposedly, influenced by the environment, there should be great physiological differences between nations, right? However, people of all races walk upright with two eyes and one mouth. Even in different environments, the physical signs are basically the same, but the skin color is different, and this difference in skin color has nothing to do with the environment: whites once drove tropical blacks to the temperate zone to be slaves, and blacks who have not been integrated by blood have been black for hundreds of years, and they will never evolve into white skin by themselves because they arrived in the temperate zone, which is absolutely different from changing species by the environment.
8. According to the theory of evolution, species change with the change of environment, evolve according to needs, and take what they need. However, the human brain is a special case, and the poor will never use what they have learned 1%. Even if you live to be a thousand years old and become a scholar, you won't need one-tenth of your brain. The human brain, however, has only half a life span. What about the other half? Didn't it evolve as much as you use it? That half brain is neither needed nor wanted by human beings. Humans don't need it at all. How can it appear out of thin air and "evolve" so well without any exercise? Moreover, this half of the brain has never been used by humans, and there is no sign of "degradation" for thousands of generations, and it is as good as the other half. How does evolution explain it?
According to the theory of evolution, animals change because the change of environment is not suitable for their survival, so they instinctively change themselves to adapt to the environment. Not to mention whether animals are monkeys or not, they can change if they want. The fact is that migration is the instinct of animals! Once a species does not adapt to the environment, their first instinct is to migrate. No one will stay in the same place and suffer, waiting for their own "evolution" to adapt to the environment.
Then there is the evolutionist cloud: some animals are forced to evolve, but natural disasters and geological mutations have occurred! They didn't have time to migrate, they were trapped and died, so they had to evolve and survive! Such as dolphins and whales. -this statement ignores the fantasy pool of science. Why not eat with evolution? Once an animal is suddenly changed, it can't live, and the ending must be extinction! Oxygen is gone, space is gone, food is gone, water is gone, what can survive is gone, and the dead can't live. How can we evolve?
For example, the Three Gorges Dam took several years from construction to closure, which was much slower than the sudden change of natural disasters. The water on which fish live is still there, but the water level has changed. But because of this change, the baiji and Chinese sturgeon became extinct immediately, and it was too late to migrate. Have they evolved? Baiji dolphin is a living fossil of living things! Survival is still so fragile! How can a creature not only not die in a more severe natural disaster mutation, but become another species to survive and reproduce? !
The scientific attitude is seeking truth from facts, and the theory of evolution can't give any convincing explanation for the origin of species today. On the contrary, with the progress of science, its theory becomes more and more absurd. Today, I still firmly believe that my ancestors were monkeys. If you are not ignorant or too lazy to think, you can only say that you are superstitious.
For example, a person rolls the dice twice, both at six o'clock. You can say, ah, what a coincidence, but he threw 1000 times in a row, all at six o'clock. At this time, we can't just use the word coincidence to explain this phenomenon. For unbelievers, the appearance of the earth and the appearance of human beings are just coincidences. Look at your mobile phone. Would you believe me if I told you that it was naturally formed? Of course not. What about this huge and orderly universe we live in?
Everything in the world is dominated by a transcendental will-that is, law, birth, illness and death, and no one can escape, but law is not material, and the material world is dominated by immateriality. How to explain it with materialism? The universe is vast. If the materialistic world outlook is accidental, then the stars in it should be disordered rather than orderly. But the constellation arrangement of the whole universe is more accurate than our computer program-each has its own orbit and will remain unchanged forever. Can this phenomenon be explained by accidental materialism? Accidental, accidental, accidental, all accidental, there must be inevitability behind it! But if we admit inevitability, what is this "inevitability"? What does materialism call this "necessity"? Have they ever acknowledged this "inevitability"? So the wonder of this world and the precise law of life make me believe that there is an all-knowing and all-powerful creator behind it, and we call him "God"!
LZ, if you are interested, you can watch this video: Intelligent design reveals the mystery of life.
Dr mortimer jerome adler, one of the greatest contemporary thinkers at the University of Chicago, said, "Evolution is a popular myth".
Professor Robert Thomas Clark, Ph.D. (Professor. Dr. Robert Thomas Clark (1906- 1957) and Professor Jacob David Baylor (Professor. Dr James david belle, 19 15- 15). ..... they hold high any hypothesis that supports evolution. "
Dr. Professor William Robin Thompson, a famous British entomologist (1887- 1972) said: "Darwin's theory of evolution has a bad influence on many disciplines, including genetics, biology, taxonomy and embryology. ...... This situation means that some scientists defend a theory that cannot be scientifically defined, let alone be clearly confirmed by science; They tried to maintain its credibility, so they suppressed their criticism and tried their best to eliminate other difficulties. In scientific research, this is abnormal and unacceptable.
Professor Dimitri Gunesov, Ph.D. Dr. Dmitri A. Kouznetsov (1955-), a famous biochemist and creationist in Moscow, Russia, said: "In Russia, scientists usually become creationists because of scientific evidence." And said: "evolutionists are very subjective when choosing data as evidence."
In the middle of the 20th century, Professor Richard Goldschmit, a famous botanist and geneticist at the University of California, Berkeley, and Professor Richard Goldschmit, Ph.D. (1878- 1958, German-American) came to the conclusion that Darwin's theory of evolution had completely collapsed. He listed a series of complex structures: from mammalian hair to hemoglobin, it is impossible to accumulate from small mutations. He once publicly challenged the fanatics of Darwin's theory of evolution: "Darwin's theory of evolution has never been proved by natural selection." ..... The range of biological variation cannot exceed the biological species.
Professor Adam sedgwick, a famous geologist and mathematician at Cambridge University in England, and his doctor (Professor Dr. Adam sedgwick, 1785- 1873, Darwin's friend) think that Darwin helped every criminal defend himself. He believes that if Darwin's theory of evolution is widely accepted, mankind will be "damaged and abused; Humans will also retreat and degenerate, even more serious than any retrogression recorded in history. " This famous scientist, Darwin's friend at that time, really foresaw all the real thoughts and behaviors of human beings in the 20th century and today with superhuman insight! This is the result of the research on the moral concept of evolution by Professor Arthur Katz, a famous anthropologist, anatomist, doctor and knight in Scotland. Dr. Sir Arthur Keith (1866- 1955): "As we have seen, the so-called natural evolution in the past and present is cruel, animal, cold and heartless."
……
In the early 1990s, there were more than 50 kinds of animal "doors" found in Maotianshan Mountain, Chengjiang County, Yunnan Province, China, that is, all animals with different body structures in the animal kingdom were more than the existing 30 kinds of "doors"; At the same time, it suddenly appeared in a large number in the way of an explosion in the CAMBRIAN era, without any trace of gradual evolution proposed by Darwin evolutionists; Moreover, since then, no new "door" has appeared. In fact, it's not just Chengjiang. As early as 1909, Professor Charles Doolittle Walcott, Ph.D. (Professor. Dr Charles Doolittle Walcott, 1850- 1927, a famous paleontologist in the United States) was discovered in the Birkis shale in Columbia, Canada. 1946, the Ediacaran fossil group discovered by scientists on Ediacaran Mountain in Flinders Mountain, Adelaide, Australia was also proved to be CAMBRIAN. Darwinists, far from explaining this sudden phenomenon, can't explain why these different "animal phyla" appear at the same time, and then decrease instead of increase. We know that the species in the world are decreasing or even extinct; Some are facing extinction and can only be protected in zoos and botanical gardens to avoid extinction. It can be seen that the theoretical hypothesis is just the opposite of scientific facts (evidence). The forerunner of human scientific research in this field may choose the great French chemist and microbiologist Professor louis pasteur, Ph.D. (Professor. Dr. louis pasteur,1822–1895, a devout Christian), proved this through scientific verification in about 1860 years. Not only that, the "second law of thermodynamics", which is recognized as the universal truth of the universe, fundamentally denies Darwin's theory of evolution; Because the evolution from amoeba to human beings is a process of regular (orderly) increase, that is, the process of entropy reduction, and this process violates the "second law of thermodynamics", so it is impossible. The theory of evolution, like the theory of continental drift, is an abuse of the theory of variation and holds that "what is today and what was the past". What's more, the discovery of various fossils has been very unfavorable to evolution. For example, the fossils and strata formed by 1980 eruption of Mount St. hellens proved that fossils and strata did not take tens of millions of years and hours to form, as evolutionists said (evolutionists never dared to mention Mount St. hellens).
We know that every biological organ needs all kinds of appropriate and completely accurate cooperation to play its normal physiological function. The structure and function of the simplest cell are extremely complicated. The complexity and mystery of the physiological structure and function of the eyes are even more unimaginable. Darwin himself was quite puzzled at the time. In the section "Extremely Perfect and Complex Organs" of Chapter 6 "Theoretical Problems" of the Origin of Species, he wrote bluntly: "The eyes have unparalleled design to adjust the focal length, allow different lighting and correct spherical aberration and chromatic aberration. I frankly admit that the hypothesis that the eyes are formed by natural selection seems to be the most ridiculous. " He later said frankly: "So far, every time I think of my eyes, I feel shocked."
The author wants to further strongly remind readers that we must never forget the words "we may imagine", "if" and "hypothesis" in the book "The Origin of Species" written by Charles Darwin. If so, what kind of results will be obtained; Assuming this is the case, then it will become something; If so, that's it; ..... What kind of science is this? What theory is this? This very obvious and out-and-out metaphysical deception induction can even convince several generations; This kind of out-and-out sophistry and false theory can win people's welcome and trust. The author believes that this is the greatest shame and dark period in the history of human civilization, and it is also the greatest misfortune for those who live in this shame and dark period! There is no doubt that many people in the scientific community are seriously superstitious, that is, they accept and spread a metaphysical and completely wrong theoretical hypothesis as a scientific fact and stubbornly stick to it; Not only that, in some people's minds, it is incredible to worship it as a god and a religion.
When we go back to the Bible, the word of God, we are very surprised. The Bible pointed out the fallacy of Darwin's theory of evolution very clearly and clearly nearly 3000 years ago. I said to myself, "This is for the world, because God wants to test them and make them feel like animals." (Ecclesiastes, chapter 3, section 18, written in 970-930 BC)
The fear of God is the beginning of knowledge and wisdom. Knowing the most holy is wisdom. In the Bible, God clearly reminds and warns people that people have dignity and don't wake up, just like dead animals. (Psalm 49, verse 20, writing time: BC 1040-970) The Bible has said: But these people seem to have no spirituality. They were born animals to be caught and slaughtered. When they slander what they don't know, they are destroyed when they destroy others. (2 Peter, chapter 2, section 12, written in 65-67 AD)
Genesis 2: 7 The Lord God created man from the dust of the ground, and breathed life into his nostrils, so he became a living soul, and his name was Adam.
We know that dozens of elements that make up the human body, whether macro or micro, no matter what kind of food they come from directly, their ultimate source is soil. You may say that qi, one of the most important components of the human body, does not mainly exist in the air? Not bad. However, it is worth noting that the human body cannot use gaseous nitrogen, and nitrogen must be converted into solid compounds (soil) before it can be used by the human body. Some people will say that the human body does not directly absorb gaseous oxygen? Yes, but the oxygen absorbed by the human body from the air is not converted into the tissue components of the human body, but used for consumption, that is, gaseous oxygen is used to oxidize and decompose the inherent components of the human body to obtain energy and maintain life. Oxygen used to make up the human body must be obtained from solid food and water. Therefore, the absorption of gaseous oxygen is the characteristic of people after they are created as "living people". Once life is over, there is no need to exist and breathing stops. What is left is a body that comes from dust and will still return to dust. The chemical composition of this body is exactly the same as that of a living person, but it is not equal to a living person. The difference lies in the "Qi of Life". Look at how concise and correct the biblical records are! Before modern biochemistry figured out the chemical composition of human body and its metabolic process, who knew this?
1998 The ninth issue of Science Expo published the article "Looking for Eve". The article said: At the beginning of this year, Newsweek published an interesting scientific dynamic report entitled "Looking for Adam and Eve", arguing that the ancestors of modern humans came from the same woman. Today, everyone on the earth has the gene of this ancestor, which means that 5 billion people in the world are interrelated. Scientists call this woman Eve.
Today, a new generation of anthropologists have made use of their superior working conditions and environment, advanced scientific instruments and advanced molecular biology to study various genes and mutations inherited by human beings and made many important discoveries. A female scientist from the University of Hawaii made an interesting experiment. She put 147 placentas of women from Asia, Africa and Europe, and even the baby of an Australian indigenous woman into a high-powered stirring centrifuge to break up their cell molecules, and finally got a transparent liquid containing pure DNA. DNA is the abbreviation of deoxynucleic acid, which is the main material basis for storing, replicating and transmitting genetic information. Genes are fragments of DNA molecules. This gene does not come from the inside of the baby's nucleus, but from the outside of the nucleus, called mitochondrial gene.
From the genetic theory, we know that mitochondrial genes have the ability to maintain cell vitality, which is the most basic function. In the 1960s, people further realized that it also contained various human genes. By the end of 1970s, it was found that it contained its own DNA and ribosome, which were relatively independent in heredity and only passed through the mother. Scientists compared the gene of 147 babies and found that the differences between genes were very small, so it was impossible to distinguish their races. These show that Eve's daughters passed on their genes, so they put forward a brand-new point of view: modern people originated in one place.