Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How to cut into arguments in argumentative writing
How to cut into arguments in argumentative writing
First, refine the argument

First of all, according to the requirements of the topic and the feelings of discussing things, we should have our own incisive opinions, form judgments, and refine the arguments of the article. In other words, before writing, I have a plan in my heart and a bottom in my heart. It is because "there is an answer" that a clear view of the object of discussion is formed. And confirm that the opinions are in line with the meaning of the question or the meaning of the materials provided, which has the value of discussion and makes the arguments that come straight to the point have a reliable guarantee. Facing the topic or the object of discussion, how can we go straight to the point without arousing feelings and refining and summarizing arguments? "

Second, pay attention to language.

Secondly, to change the writing habit, the first sentence should use the language of discussion instead of narration. In other words, with a clear affirmative or negative sentence, the "discussion" is suddenly opened. Some students are used to writing narratives, and there are often long narratives in argumentative essays, especially those who are not good at stating arguments and posing argumentative essays; Some students have no idea before writing, no matter what argumentative paper they write, they always start with notes, and even after a long narrative, they concentrate on thinking about what arguments should be put forward; The above-mentioned writing habits greatly hinder the writing of argumentative essays. If you don't change them, you won't be able to get straight to the point and make a clear argument.

Naturally, using the writing method of "one case, one discussion" at the beginning of the case is also a discussion layout, but this layout is relatively common and easy to master, so it is difficult for us to come straight to the point and put forward arguments. For example, if the author does not form a clear judgment in his mind beforehand, or does not follow his own habits,

For example, Sima Qian, a great historian in China, "read thousands of books and took the Wan Li road" when he was young, and finally wrote Historical Records, which has been passed down through the ages; Leonardo da vinci, a famous Italian painter, practiced painting eggs as a child and finally became a master of painting. Einstein, a great physicist, was short of intelligence when he was young, but he carried forward the spirit of "one person knows, I know ten things, one person knows ten things, and I know everything" and practiced basic skills hard, and finally climbed to the peak of science. ...

Third, the establishment of sub-arguments.

In an argumentative essay, apart from the central argument, there must also be sub-arguments that prove, supplement and play a role in the central argument. Sub-arguments are dominated by and serve the central argument. What we call "straight to the point and put forward arguments" requires that every argument should be put forward at the beginning of the natural paragraph after the argument is launched, except from the first paragraph. For example, to prove that the central argument has three sub-arguments, then these three sub-arguments are put forward at the beginning of three natural paragraphs in logical order, which makes the position of sub-arguments in the process of article argumentation very clear and adds luster to the eye-catching arguments of the whole article.