Argumentative reading is one of the three forms of modern literature reading. The requirements of the new curriculum standard for junior high school students' argumentative writing are: being able to read simple argumentative writing, being able to distinguish between viewpoints and materials, finding the connection between viewpoints and materials, and making judgments through their own thinking. Therefore, we must be familiar with the basic knowledge of argumentative writing, understand common questions, master certain answering methods, conduct appropriate training, and improve our reading and analytical skills.

First, the structure of the argumentative essay 1, the basic idea: asking questions (introduction)-analyzing problems (this theory)-solving problems (conclusion); 2. Common structures: total score type, parallel type, progressive type and contrast type.

Second, there are two main argumentative topics: 1. The topic is the argument: the topic is generally a judgment sentence, and the article directly expounds its truth. For example, where there is a will, there is a way, and contentment is always happy. 2. The topic is the topic: the topic only puts forward the object or problem to be discussed, and the argument is put forward in the article. For example, where do people's correct ideas come from, about reading, about fashion and so on.

Argumentation method of argumentative paper

1. Demonstrate with examples: that is, list typical cases to enhance the persuasiveness of the article and prove the argument with facts.

2. Citation argument: also known as reasoning argument, citing famous sayings or representative words, allusions and fables of authoritative celebrities. It is conducive to telling the truth.

3. Metaphor demonstration: Through metaphor, profound things can be turned into easy-to-understand things, and abstract things can be turned into concrete images, making people easy to accept and understand.

4. Contrast and demonstration: positive and negative contrast, clear distinction, outstanding emphasis, making people distinguish right from wrong and impressive.

5. Analogical argumentation: that is, using cases of the same or similar nature to draw conclusions or arguments, often using metaphors and parallelism.

The main points of argumentative reading grasp the argument: grasping the argument of the article is the key to reading argumentative writing. How to accurately find or summarize the central argument?

First of all, read through the full text and perceive the content of the article as a whole. Find out what the author is talking about and what he thinks of the problems he is talking about. Then, see if there are any sentences suitable for argument in the text. Argument should be a complete statement of the author's point of view and a sentence with strong generality.

Some topics need to be summarized by ourselves. When summing up, we must base ourselves on the center of the full text and borrow the key words in the text appropriately. Written sentences should not be vague, let alone questions.

Argument analysis: Arguments are generally divided into factual arguments and rational arguments. The common questions in the senior high school entrance examination include: distinguishing factual arguments from rational arguments, summarizing factual arguments, analyzing the role of arguments, and supplementing arguments according to arguments.

1. Distinguish factual arguments from rational arguments: factual arguments include representative cases, conclusive data and reliable historical facts. Generally speaking, the argument of truth includes correct and feasible truth, aphorisms, famous sayings and so on. However, it is inappropriate for some students to use all the words of celebrities in the article as arguments. Celebrities' words are sometimes included in factual arguments, which are only a part of factual arguments, not as reasons to prove them. At this point, they cannot be used as rational arguments.

2. Summarizing factual arguments: After finding factual arguments, it is also a common question type to summarize in concise language. When summarizing factual arguments, we must grasp the essential characteristics of the arguments according to the arguments, and then express them in exact language.

3. Analysis of the role of arguments: Whether it is a factual argument or a rational argument, the role is to prove the author's point of view, but some are proof central arguments, and some are proof sub-arguments, which should be accurately distinguished when answering questions.

4. Make up the argument according to the argument: This is a common question type in recent years, and the arguments for making up the argument should be representative and convincing.

Argumentative writing: Frequently asked questions include the methods and functions of distinguishing argumentative writing and how to demonstrate arguments.

Answer according to the commonly used argumentation method: the content demonstrated by factual argumentation belongs to factual argumentation. When analyzing the function, we must first find out what typical examples the author lists and what viewpoints to prove; Then analyze it to enhance the persuasiveness of the article. Reason argument is authoritative because the quoted content is authoritative, so this argument method is authoritative and powerful. Metaphorical argument means that argument can make the truth easy to understand and be accepted by people. Comparative argument is to compare the positive and negative facts or reasons. If the topic requires analysis of how to demonstrate the argument, it is generally necessary to briefly analyze the content from the perspective of argumentation methods.

The common problems in analyzing the structural levels of argumentative writing are to write the ideas of the article, divide the levels of the article, and summarize the contents of each level in concise language. The basis for answering such questions is mainly the general discussion ideas of argumentative papers (raising questions [introduction], analyzing questions [theory] and solving problems [conclusion]) and the structure of the articles (juxtaposition, total score, comparison and progression). When analyzing the structure, we should pay attention to the internal relations between paragraphs, such as paragraphs, sentences and words that play a transitional role in the text.

Language of argumentative writing: The words in argumentative writing are often abstract. When reading, understanding and summarizing rich keywords is the key to solving problems. The common question type is to understand the meaning of words in the language environment. At the same time, the language of argumentative writing often has its own characteristics. Accordingly, appreciating language style is also a common problem.