Although our ability is low, our vision is high. Let me mention an objective phenomenon: as a master student, except when he first comes into contact with a certain field, he may read the master's thesis, but basically he won't read it at all in the later stage. There are also large and small Chinese core journals that receive the same treatment.
Ask the graduates another question: Is your master's thesis rubbish? How many people have the courage to say no?
Asking this question is by no means strange to the master. Take the three-year master's degree as an example. Students attend classes in the first year and do research in the second year. Look for a job in the first half of the third year, and then you can start preparing your graduation thesis. Many schools will pre-reply shortly after the end of the new year, and then blindly review for a month. In other words, the nominal research time is from summer vacation to summer vacation for more than one year. For students in some schools, it is necessary to consider how to make a small paper, plus the review cycle, luck and other issues, and have to start issuing small papers from last semester. If you don't start writing small papers until the next semester of Graduate School 2 (the review cycle of many domestic journals is in months), if you are unlucky, you won't know until Graduate School 3 has published a small paper. When looking for a job, you will be restless, tasteless and bored.
Domestic universities, mainly small papers, rarely big papers. After the first year of research, spend three or four months doing something, and write a small paper before the end of the second semester to ensure graduation. Without pressure, big paper will naturally have nowhere to come.
Not to mention the quality of the two-year program. In-service graduate students are even worse.
There are only two good papers,
First of all, briefly and clearly outline the past of an industry; However, industry leaders seriously wrote a summary. Generally, graduate students have only entered this field for one or two years, and the summary written is either too shallow or misleading.
Second, innovative articles; To tell the truth, the tutor may always be better with him, and he can really be a little innovative, not rubbish (these people are actually very lucky); Most people look up documents and find information by themselves, and they can't figure out which documents are useful and which are nonsense. Even some subjects are difficult to get started. In the past two years, it is a gift and hard work to understand this piece, and it is even more difficult to get in touch with the forefront of the industry. It is even more difficult to innovate on this basis. Unless the master students have the right time, place and people, it is impossible to make anything valuable. Many people are tutors. They drop a question, and then no one asks. What value can they find? Are journals that can publish these findings rubbish?