Diversity of scientific and technological innovation: scientific and technological innovation is not only reflected in the number and publication of papers, but also includes other forms of scientific and technological achievements, such as patents, software, technical standards, product prototypes and so on. Paying too much attention to papers may ignore these various forms of scientific and technological innovation, which makes the scientific and technological evaluation unable to fully reflect the innovative ability and achievements in the field of science and technology.
Practical application of scientific and technological achievements: the ultimate value of scientific and technological achievements lies in their effects and contributions in practical application. Paying too much attention to the number and publication of papers may ignore the quality and effect of scientific and technological achievements in industrialization, commercialization and social application. This makes it impossible to accurately evaluate the actual contribution of scientific and technological achievements to social and economic development.
Comprehensive ability of scientific and technological team: scientific and technological innovation often requires multidisciplinary and cross-disciplinary cooperation and collaboration. Paying too much attention to the paper may neglect the comprehensive ability and cooperation ability of the team, and it is impossible to evaluate the quality and effect of the scientific and technological team in scientific research project management, scientific and technological transformation and technology promotion.
In order to get rid of the problem of only evaluating papers, the following measures can be taken:
Diversification of evaluation indicators: scientific and technological evaluation should comprehensively consider various forms of scientific and technological achievements, including papers, patents, technical standards, product applications, etc. By introducing diversified evaluation indicators, scientific and technological evaluation can reflect the quality and effect of scientific and technological innovation more comprehensively.
Emphasize the practical application value of scientific and technological achievements: scientific and technological evaluation should pay attention to the effect and contribution of scientific and technological achievements in practical application. We can consider introducing indicators such as industrialization transformation, commercialization promotion and social impact to evaluate the actual contribution of scientific and technological achievements to social and economic development.
Comprehensive evaluation of scientific and technological team's ability: scientific and technological evaluation should not only pay attention to the number and publication of papers by individual researchers, but also comprehensively evaluate the ability and cooperation ability of scientific and technological teams. We can consider the team's scientific research project management ability, technology transformation ability, technology promotion ability and other indicators to comprehensively evaluate the quality and effect of the scientific and technological team.
By taking the above measures, we can get rid of the limitation of only evaluating papers, and promote scientific and technological evaluation to evaluate the quality and effect of scientific and technological innovation more comprehensively and accurately. This can better stimulate scientific and technological innovation, promote the industrialization and application of scientific and technological achievements, and promote the contribution of science and technology to social and economic development.