Definition: first point out the essence of the other party's mistake, then refute the wrong argument pointed out, and at the same time or after refuting, put forward your own correct point of view to prove it.
Three elements of argumentative writing: argument, argument and argumentation
Write an opinion according to the topic and then explain it. Persuasive ability is very important, and three elements are indispensable. Take a closer look at the following specific introduction, and you can try to write more in the future to make your composition progress. In addition, famous sayings, aphorisms and celebrity examples should be registered in order to be better used in the composition. Generally speaking, the argument of argumentation is to solve the problem of "what to prove", argumentation is to solve the problem of "what to prove" and argumentation is to solve the problem of "how to prove".
[3] argument
Argument is a sentence that correctly and clearly expounds the author's point of view, and it is the soul and commander of an article. Any article has only one central argument, and generally there can be sub-arguments.
The argument should be correct, clear and general, and the complete judgment sentence should never be ambiguous.
(1) correctness: the persuasiveness of the argument is rooted in the correct reflection of objective things, which in turn depends on whether the author's position, viewpoint, attitude and method are correct. If the argument itself is incorrect or even absurd, no amount of arguments can convince people. Therefore, the correct argument is the minimum requirement for argumentative writing.
2 Significantness: What is for and what is against should be very clear, and it must not be ambiguous or ambiguous.
Novelty: the argument should be as novel and profound as possible, which can transcend other people's views. It's not repeating other people's platitudes, nor is it irrelevant and general. It should be as unique and novel as possible.
An argument generally has four positions: the title, the beginning, the middle of the article and the end. But it is more often at the beginning of the article, and so is the paragraph argument. When similar statements appear at the beginning and the end, the starting argument and the ending echo argument.
Some argumentative arguments are expressed in clear sentences in the article, and we just need to find them out; Others are not directly expressed in clear sentences and need to be refined and summarized by readers themselves. The summarized sentence should not contain rhetorical devices.
Note: rhetorical questions and figurative sentences cannot be used as arguments, but must be declarative sentences.
Question 2: How to write the expert review opinions on intermediate thesis topics and intermediate thesis topics? Just a moment, please. I'll send it to you now.
Question 3: Who has the expert's appraisal opinion on senior thesis titles? Most people still can't see them. However, I have read the opinions of the intermediate judges, but that is the general opinion, not the opinion of the paper. The general content is about this comrade's work performance and professional skills. Finally, the expert's personal opinion is to agree to this person's application for intermediate title.
thesis
question
Can help
Question 4: How to write the title of peer expert review representative 2?
Fill in the form and explain.
First, this table is for college teachers and natural science research, experimental technology, social science (education management
) The application for senior post qualification of researcher is submitted to peer experts for appraisal. 2. Requirements for filling in the form: 1-3, 4 and 7 pages of "Representative Title" shall be filled in by the applicant, and shall be examined and sealed by the personnel department of the school; Figures are filled in by the Provincial Department of Education. Three, this form can be copied, but it must be printed on both sides, and the layout and page number cannot be changed.
Representative evaluation requirements
First, the identification of representative works is a serious work and an important link to ensure the quality of evaluation. The evaluation experts should be highly responsible and realistic, and make an appropriate and fair evaluation according to the actual level of the representatives and the declared professional and technical positions. Avoid situations where the evaluation is too strict or too wide.
Two, "representative evaluation" refers to the evaluation of each representative provided by the applicant. Experts are invited to fill in the submitted papers and works one by one. "Comprehensive evaluation opinions on representative works" refers to the comprehensive evaluation opinions on the academic achievements, personal research ability or some shortcomings of the applicant's representative works. "Expert appraisal conclusion" must clearly put forward whether it meets the requirements of promotion to the corresponding position. The opinions are divided into three levels: ① the academic level meets the post requirements; (2) The academic level basically meets the post requirements; ③ The academic level has not yet reached the post requirements. Ask the experts to tick "√" on the corresponding options. After completing the relevant columns, experts should sign the Expert Appraisal Conclusion (B).
Three, to declare senior positions and promote deputy senior positions on behalf of the personnel determined by the experts with senior positions, deputy senior positions on behalf of the personnel determined by the experts with senior positions.
4. Ask the experts to send the Peer Expert Appraisal Form together with the representative (original) to the personnel department of our school, but not directly to the applicant or the school where the applicant is located.
5. Please ask the personnel department of the school where the expert is located to sign the opinions in the corresponding column on page 7 and affix the official seal, and then return the materials to the Education Department of Fujian Province.
I sincerely thank all the experts and their schools for their strong support to the evaluation of professional and technical positions of teaching and research personnel in colleges and universities in Fujian Province!
wenku.baidu/...eDycbu
Question 5: How to write a paper review opinion (sample)
IPv6 is the core technology of the next generation Internet, and network protocol testing is a powerful tool to ensure the smooth operation of the network. Zheng Hongxia's master thesis studies the conformance testing of IPv6 protocol, focusing on the design method of test cases, and its topic selection has important practical value.
On the basis of summarizing and analyzing the previous work, combined with the scientific research background, this paper selects the key work and puts forward a new design method of IPv6 protocol conformance test cases. By applying this method, the generation of test sequence of pre-test step and post-test step can be optimized, and a simple test case structure composed of pre-test step and test body can be obtained.
The evaluation index and calculation method of test cases are put forward, and the advantages of the new test case design method are analyzed quantitatively. Using the test case design method proposed by the author, the test sets of ICMPv6 protocol, IPv6 PMTU protocol, addressing protocol, IPSec protocol and conversion mechanism protocol are designed. In the test practice, it is verified that the new test case design method can simplify the test sequence, shorten the test execution time and improve the test efficiency.
The work of this paper shows that the author has mastered the basic theory and professional knowledge in related fields, has strong scientific research ability, and has achieved some innovative and practical research results in the design of network protocol conformance test cases.
The paper is clear in organization, clear in description, concise and fluent, and well combined with theory and practice. Reach the level of compensation for master's degree thesis and agree to defend the thesis.
Overall evaluation of the paper: excellent 2 votes, good 2 votes, 1 vote, average, 5 votes in favor of defense.
Write in this format in combination with your paper.
Question 6: How to write the expert appraisal opinions of senior engineers' review papers? The common tedious titles are:' Study on rapid analysis method of chemical composition in molten steel'. In this kind of topic, omitting the words' about' and' research' will not affect the expression. As a paper, what aspects of research and investigation does the general contractor include, so the above topic can be refined as' rapid analysis of chemical composition of molten steel'. In this way, the number of words is reduced from 265,438+0 to 65,438+02, which is clear and concise.
Question 7: How to write a comment on the title of the paper 1. The center is prominent, the argument is sufficient, the structure is rigorous, the level is clear, and the expression ability is strong.
2. Rich materials and reliable data can be processed and sorted by scientific methods.
Question 8: How to write the review comments of the paper? Please refer to the following aspects to evaluate the quality of the paper. You can refer to the following evaluation criteria: (1) Thesis topic selection and summary: theoretical significance or practical value to national economy, scientific and technological social practice, whether reading is extensive, whether summary is comprehensive, and whether domestic and international trends are mastered (20%); (2) Basic theory and professional knowledge: whether there is theoretical analysis and experimental verification, whether the demonstration is accurate, whether the results are outstanding, whether the workload is sufficient, and whether there is a solid and broad basic theory and systematic and in-depth professional knowledge (30%); (3) scientific research ability and creativity: whether there are new ideas, arguments and achievements reflect strong scientific research ability and creativity. (40%); (4) Writing ability: whether the organization is clear, whether the level is clear, whether the paper format is standardized, and whether the style of study is rigorous (10%).
Question 9: How to write the recommendation of the work in the recommendation letter of the professional title evaluation expert? What title are you evaluating now? Has the paper been published?