No matter in school or in society, everyone will inevitably contact or use comments. Comments play the role of "baton" to the evaluated object and point out the direction of their efforts. I believe many friends are distressed to write comments. The following are the common comments I collected for my thesis defense, which are for reference only and I hope to help you.

Common comments on thesis defense 1 1. This paper is correct in topic selection, reasonable in structure, rich in content, sufficient in data, advanced in analysis method, reasonable in writing progress, and the conclusions and suggestions have regional practical significance. The recommendation is an excellent graduation thesis at the university level.

2. The topic is contemporary and realistic. The structure of the full text is reasonable. The expression of views is basically accurate. The full text closely follows the requirements of the administrative management specialty and fully embodies the characteristics of the administrative management specialty. Check out more related information. But the main deficiency is that there are not many things that belong to their own innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.

This article has a novel conception. Taking xx as a clue, this paper comprehensively analyzes the problems and reasons of xx in combination with local standards. And put forward the countermeasures to solve the existing problems. Content argumentation also teaches scientific rationality. The full text fully embodies the characteristics of administrative management specialty and the format is standardized. But innovation is not enough.

4. The structure of the paper is complete, and each part basically conforms to the writing standard of the paper. The title of the paper is very good and creative. In order to write this paper well, the author has done some research, especially Steinbeck's original work. It is not difficult to see from the author's reference to the original work that the author is quite familiar with the content of the original work. The language is also sharp, the paper is clear and reasonable, and the viewpoint is unique, which has certain reference value and can be regarded as a good article.

5. The references in this paper are sufficient and meet the needs of the topic. Taking xx as an example, this paper focuses on xx. The topic of the paper meets the requirements of administrative management, with complete structure, clear thinking, accurate expression of views and standardized format, which can better use administrative professional knowledge to analyze practical administrative problems in reality. But the argument of personal views is not sufficient. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.

6. The topic of the thesis conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is average. The topic selection has practical guiding significance.

7. This paper meets the professional requirements and reflects the social hot issues. Therefore, the research of this topic is conducive to promoting the further development of xx in China. The full text starts with the problem of xx, and then analyzes &;

In the ten-minute presentation, the student introduced the main idea, content and structure of the paper, as well as the writing process of the paper. The organization is clear, the language is correct, and the teacher's questions are basically answered correctly, which reflects a certain professional quality. However, there are some minor problems in the design process and the flow chart is not perfect. I hope to correct it in time.

9. As can be seen from the defense, this student has a solid professional foundation, is well prepared, is very familiar with the contents of the paper, can concisely and clearly state the design ideas and processes, has a smooth system display, has well-founded answers to questions, has clear basic concepts, and has certain innovations in the paper. I hope to continue to improve some words and symbols in the paper and strive for standardized use.

10, the student explained the main contents of the paper fluently and clearly within the specified time, and was able to answer the relevant questions of the paper properly, with a modest attitude and a solid computer foundation. It is suggested to use appropriate words to express the image opening function and standardize the paper format.

1 1. Combining with mathematical knowledge, using computer technology to deal with geological problems, the paper has a thorough grasp of methods and principles, and the paper is innovative. The results of fast Fourier transform and wavelet transform are analyzed in place, and the processing effect is good, and the computer basic literacy is good. The answers to the main questions in the defense are accurate and thorough. It would be better if there is a contrast between the converted indicators in this paper.

12, the paper is clear and simple to explain, but it lacks its own new ideas and methods, mostly applying other people's research results, and the paper format should be standardized.

13, fully prepared for defense, able to answer the teacher's questions in detail, able to repeatedly discuss and study the difficulties encountered in the design process to find a better solution, and good professional skills. It would be better if the static web page can be made dynamic by combining professional improvement, but the deficiency is that the description of the table in the database is not quite right, and I hope it can be improved.

14, the paper is clearly stated, come straight to the point, and get to the point directly. I can answer the teacher's questions fluently and think clearly, but I can't correctly explain some codes in the paper and there are a few language errors. I hope there will be more innovations in future research.

15, the student can state the main content of the paper within the specified time, but the answer to questions in the defense is not very smooth, he is not familiar with the details and techniques of design, and the answer to questions is not relevant enough.

16, the paper is elaborated from five parts, with prominent points, fluent and skilled defense, basic knowledge in place and time meeting the requirements. The disadvantage is that there are some conceptual mistakes in the article.

17, this paper takes xx as the theme, focusing on xx issues. The topic selection basically conforms to the category of administrative management and fully embodies the professional characteristics. The structure of the full text meets the requirements, the logical thinking is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the viewpoints are expressed accurately, the language is fluent, and the argumentation method is reasonable, but the innovation is not enough, some viewpoints are not fully demonstrated, the format is not very standardized, and there are not many viewpoints that really belong to them. Generally speaking, it is basically qualified.

18. This topic is realistic, targeted and practical. The structural arrangement is scientific and reasonable, with clear thinking and distinct levels. The parts are closely related, the opinions are basically accurate, and the argumentation content is more convincing. In the process of argumentation, the basic knowledge principle of administrative specialty is basically used to analyze the main problems in the article, but the reference materials are insufficient, the article lacks its own original content, and a few viewpoints are not profound and comprehensive.

19, this paper studies the official accountability system, which can provide reference for solving the problems existing in the official accountability system in China. In the structure of the full text, firstly, the practical significance of the official accountability system is analyzed, then the dilemma of the official accountability system in China is deeply analyzed, and finally effective suggestions are put forward to solve the dilemma. The full text reflects the requirements of professional characteristics, meets the training requirements of administrative management specialty, and the references meet the needs of the paper's viewpoints and themes, and the practical demonstration is not enough. But there is not much real innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.

20. The idea of the paper is clear, the sentences are basically fluent, the levels are clear, and the opinions are expressed accurately. The author organically combines the basic knowledge of administrative management with the practical problems of inner-party supervision, and puts forward some better solutions to the practical problems of inner-party supervision. The literature consulted is closely combined with the theme, but the arguments in some places are not very clear and convincing, which generally meets the requirements of graduation thesis, some contents are not well combined with the theme, and there are also some minor problems in logical structure. Generally speaking, it basically meets the basic requirements of graduation thesis.

2 1. Students can explain the main contents of the paper fluently and clearly within the specified time, and can answer questions related to the paper appropriately. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the paper score as "good" according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense.

2. Students can state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, but the organization is not clear enough, and the answers to some main questions are not appropriate enough, but they can make supplementary explanations after being prompted. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the paper score as passing according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense.

3. In the process of defense, the student introduced the main points of the paper and answered the questions of the defense members. The defense shows that the student has a deep research on the compensation system for land expropriation, sorted out a lot of literature materials, has a certain literature ability, and has made innovations in the research on compensation for land expropriation. The students' answers to the teacher's questions are basically correct. In addition, there are still some shortcomings in the paper, such as the deep-seated basic theoretical issues involved in land expropriation are not discussed deeply enough. Based on the opinions of the tutor and reviewers and the performance of the student in the defense process, the defense team unanimously agreed to pass the defense of the student's graduation thesis after careful discussion, and suggested granting a bachelor's degree.

4. During the defense, the student introduced the main points and contents of the paper and answered the questions of the defense members. The defense shows that the student has a deep research on the land expropriation compensation system, collated a large number of documents, has a certain ability of literature review, and has innovation in the research of land expropriation compensation. The students' answers to the teacher's questions are basically correct. In addition, there are still some shortcomings in the paper, such as the deep-seated basic theoretical issues involved in land expropriation are not discussed deeply enough.

5. Good idea and great research value. However, this topic is huge in structure and content, and it also needs strong and mature independent research ability. So it is not difficult for undergraduates. If the author can learn more from the previous research results and strengthen the reading and analysis of the literature, it will help him straighten out the logic and think smoothly in the argument of the topic. It is necessary to be bold and confident in the presentation of the paper, and improve the refining ability of the on-the-spot language and the adaptability to the problem.

6. Students can skillfully and concisely state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, and respond quickly, clearly and accurately when answering questions. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the papers as excellent according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense. Students can describe the main contents of the paper within the specified time, and can generally answer the questions raised, without principled mistakes. After full discussion, according to the quality of students' papers and their performance in defense, the defense team agreed to evaluate the papers as medium.

7. In the five-minute presentation, the student introduced the main points, content and structure of the paper, as well as the writing process of the paper. The organization is clear and the language is correct, but sometimes he has to read the lecture notes, so he is not fully prepared. For the first question raised by the teacher, the students gave a basically correct answer only under the inspiration of the teacher. The students' answer to the teacher's second question is basically correct, but it is virtually revealed that it is not a clerical error to write a tragic belief as a tragic fate. For the third question, the students' answer is satisfactory, but there are some language errors. In terms of pronunciation and intonation, survival lies in several problems. Fluency is not the same as other students in a defense group. After careful discussion, the defense team still agreed to pass the student's graduation thesis, but asked the student to correct some language errors left in the thesis.

8. In the five-minute presentation, the student introduced the main points, content and structure of the paper, as well as the research conducted for this purpose. The statement is concise and to the point, which shows that you have a certain understanding of the problem under study. The student's answer to the teacher's first question is accurate; The student answered the question about the source of the data truthfully, but in many places in the paper, she did not indicate the source of the data, which is a major defect. The answer to the third question is obviously not relevant enough. You may not have heard the teacher's oral question clearly. The student is fluent in defense language, but there are some problems in pronunciation and intonation. After careful discussion, the defense team unanimously agreed to pass the student's graduation thesis, but asked the student to correct some mistakes in the thesis.

3 1. The website design is fresh and beautiful, the main questions are answered accurately, and the basic concepts are clear. I want to correct the database storage problem in the file.

2. The structure of the paper is rigorous and distinct, with progressive analysis structure, smooth logic, clear organization and prominent focus. The format of this article conforms to academic norms. It shows that the author has strong independent scientific research ability. The paper shows that the author has mastered the basic theory and analysis method of enterprise management specialty, and the paper has reached the level of master's degree thesis. He agrees to participate in the thesis defense and suggests that a master's degree be awarded.

3. The paper is good at thinking and synthesizing, but it lacks consideration of actual needs and situations, such as users' demand for professional settings and the collectability and availability of data in data mining. It is suggested that a broader perspective should be adopted in related research in the future.

4. The student explained the design details of the database in detail, did in-depth research, and independently completed the design part of the forum. He has certain scientific research ability, clear thinking in the defense and concise and smooth answers. After careful discussion, the defense team agreed that the student's performance was good, but asked the student to correct some mistakes in the paper.

5. The student can state the main content of the paper within the specified time, but the answer to questions in the defense is not very smooth, unfamiliar with the design details, and the relevance of answering questions is not enough.

6. The format of the paper is correct, the structure is rigorous, the levels are distinct, the writing is standardized, the logic is strict, the language is fluent, and the focus is prominent, which shows that the author has strong independent scientific research ability. The thesis is excellent in general, and I agree to submit a defense, suggesting that I be awarded a master's degree in agriculture.

7. Elaborate the thesis from five parts, with outstanding key points, fluent and skilled defense, basic knowledge in place and time meeting the requirements. The disadvantage is that there are some conceptual mistakes in the article.

8. It is found that seven aspects of website experience, such as usability experience, usefulness experience, visual experience, price experience, commodity experience, service experience and reputation experience, can well explain the connotation of website experience. Using SOR model, it is found that website experience has a significant positive impact on purchase intention, and emotion and perceived risk are some intermediary variables between website experience and purchase intention. The paper uses normative analysis and empirical analysis to prove its own point of view, and the research method is more scientific. The innovations of this paper are as follows: firstly, a new model of website experience research is constructed; Secondly, using the empirical analysis method systematically, this paper analyzes the factors that affect the online purchase intention from multiple angles. This paper has considerable theoretical depth. The paper has clear viewpoints, clear and powerful arguments, sufficient and reliable arguments, accurate data, detailed information and rich and standardized literature review, among which there are some new views on the influence of website experience on purchase intention. The disadvantage is that the dimension of website experience is not comprehensive enough, especially the technical factors of the website. In the future, we can consider studying the interpretation of website experience by website technical factors such as network speed.

9. This paper mainly studies the data model of undergraduate specialty setting prediction system in colleges and universities. Firstly, this paper summarizes the existing data models of specialty setting, and analyzes their shortcomings in functionality, predictability, analysis and mining. Then, combined with the actual demand of undergraduate specialty setting in colleges and universities, data mining technology, data warehouse and OLAP are introduced to construct the data model of undergraduate specialty setting prediction system based on data mining. Generally speaking, the framework of the paper is clear, the logic is rigorous, and the writing reflects my own academic thinking and speculative conclusions, and I have my own unique opinions.

10, the paper is clear and simple to explain. The disadvantage is that they lack their own new ideas and methods, and most of them apply other people's research results. The paper format should be standardized.

;