Argumentative paper 1, focusing on talents, running an enterprise depends on two treasures, one is capital and the other is talent, which is almost the knowledge of all enterprises. Weighing the weight of the two, the talent problem is the first.
The value of talents cannot be overstated. In the well-known Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Liu Bei said: "Wolong Feng Chu won the first place and won the world." It can be seen how important talent is to the prosperity of a country. Governing enterprises is not as complicated as governing the country, but the same is true, and talents are rare.
But we are often confused. Since Wolong Feng Chu, the first and second talent in the world, can win the world, why did Shu Han, who has both, fail? Maybe Wolong Feng Chu waves get a hollow reputation?
History has long been a public opinion. Although Zhuge Liang has the talent of governing the country and keeping the country safe, he has the reputation of wisdom incarnate, a high degree of judgment that "three points in the world know his youth" and a high degree of trust in Liu Huangshu Baidicheng. Committed to the civil and military affairs of the country, all this is predetermined, but before he can conquer, his death is still inevitable. The consequence of doing one's best is that "there is no general in Shu, and Liao Hua is the pioneer". Until later, the late ruler A Dou was captured by the military forces of the Western Jin Dynasty. He was so happy that he became a Jiang Wei, who could hardly clap his hands, revived the Han Dynasty and finally became a dream. "Heroes cry on their coats from now on" makes the younger generation lament.
The big joke played by history on Zhuge Liang proves that Zhuge Liang's personal tragedy doomed the tragedy of Shu Han. This is by no means a personal disrespect for Zhuge Liang. On the contrary, it is precisely because too many people regard Zhuge Liang as a god that the national security depends on a person's health. The tragedy of Shu is that Zhuge Liang "fought alone".
There are many places to laugh at Cao Wei's defeat, but don't forget that the talent mechanism in Wei and Jin Dynasties laid the foundation for victory. Even Huang Kou's children know that Cao Ying has "counselors in groups, and war generals are like clouds". On the other hand, in Shu Han, Zhuge was the only civil servant and military commander who could count. There were also several military commanders, that is, the army of the Five Tigers, who blocked the Western Expedition in the east and killed every battle. Once Zhang Guan is killed, Huang Ma will grow old and this country will inevitably embark on the road of national subjugation.
Zhuge Liang is a child prodigy, which is recognized as common sense, but his mistake is that he didn't put down his power until his death, and he didn't trust anyone. Of course, it is impossible to cultivate talents with their own value, and his trouble is that once the opponent has distrust, even if there is no evidence, he will not let go of punishing him until he dies. Wei Yan's rebellion is basically a masterpiece concocted by Zhuge Liang.
Compared with Cao Cao, Zhuge Liang is a talented person, but he is definitely not a good leader. Although Cao Cao has a bad reputation, he knows how to authorize and motivate his subordinates, and he also has literary talent and skills, without losing too much of Kong Ming. These are all places where Zhuge Liang can compete with Cao Cao in addition to his own talents. From this perspective, Zhuge Liang's failure is not difficult to understand.
For a long time, people have been used to measuring talents by IQ, but modern research shows that the decisive factor of talent success is not only IQ, but also EQ.
A well-known research institution in the United States investigated 188 companies, tested the IQ and EQ of each company's executives, and analyzed the test results of each supervisor and their performance at work. It turns out that for me, the influence of emotional intelligence is 9 times that of IQ. People with slightly lower IQ can also succeed if their EQ index is higher.
Kai-fu Lee said that EQ means having enough courage to face the challenges that can be overcome, enough measurement to accept the challenges that cannot be overcome, and enough' wisdom' to distinguish the difference between the two. He is very much in favor of "establishing an evaluation index system for all kinds of talents composed of factors such as morality, knowledge and ability".
Emotional intelligence can't be learned by endorsement or examination. Under the influence of the traditional back test mode in China, the cultivation of EQ has been neglected for a long time. Examination-oriented mentality has caused many China students to study hard every day, regard the pursuit of good grades as their only goal in life, have no time to make friends, and neglect the cultivation of interpersonal relationships. The "ranking" of schools in China has created a "zero-sum" mentality (there is only one first place in each class, and students regard each other as competitors). Such an educational model may gradually cultivate students into people with low emotional intelligence.
In short, there is a huge space for a good education to cultivate emotional intelligence factors. If teachers always focus on shaping children's minds in the whole family education process, they should care about children emotionally, respect children from personality, educate children from daily behavior norms and let children understand the truth from high-level education. Then, these children who receive emotional education will not only become learning machines.
IQ is a tool to express intelligence level, which reflects intelligence level. Emotional intelligence is the ability to know, control and adjust one's emotions, and the level of emotional intelligence reflects the difference of emotional quality. Emotional intelligence plays a more important role in people's success than IQ. IQ and EQ are both important psychological qualities of people and an important foundation for career success. Therefore, if you want to be a successful person, you should not only learn new knowledge and skills in related fields, but also consciously improve your emotional intelligence, which can affect the exertion of other abilities.
In the cold weapon era, a swift horse is the dream of a war general. With a swift horse, it will be even more powerful on the battlefield, and with a bad horse, it will affect the combat effectiveness. For example, Lu Bu, his Red Rabbit, his Yellow Horse, and Hu's Kicking Snow Zhuan all made great contributions to their achievements.
Today, with the rapid development of modern transportation, horses have lost their previous significance. Except in grasslands and some tourist attractions, as well as some areas with particularly inconvenient transportation, people riding horses are very rare. Maxima in nature naturally loses the significance of identification, search and preservation.
However, people usually use "a swift horse" as a metaphor for talents. Every era and every unit needs talents, and there is no time and space restriction. No country, society or unit has said that talents are not needed. Especially in today's society, it is of great significance to find real talents, retain talents and let talents play a greater role.
But how to find and retain talents, each unit does it differently. Either you can't find talent, or you can't keep talent. Even cause a waste of talent without knowing it.
Isn't it? Some units recruit talents based on academic qualifications rather than ability. Take high education as a hard indicator, put people on the shelf after they are recruited, and let them do some general work that can be done well with high education. Even let them engage in some jobs that are not in line with their majors, and let them develop in an all-round way and become compound talents. As for the general college students who are engaged in jobs that are not in line with their majors after graduation, they are everywhere. Although there are institutional reasons, it is also more directly related to the concept of employing units. This is like finding a swift horse, but not letting it run long distances and take the lead, but letting it engage in incompatible work, such as pulling carts, plowing fields and carrying loads. How to help talents develop their expertise and make greater contributions?
Some units pay attention to talents verbally, guide talents in their work, ignore treatment and despise training, resulting in long-term detention of talents and undue losses to their work. Just like finding a swift horse first, I know its importance, but for various reasons, various reasons. Can't or can't meet the requirements of Maxima, the work standard requires the other party to be high, but the treatment given to the other party in all aspects is very low. Even the other party is dissatisfied that they consume more and faster office supplies because of their work. Only let the horse run, not let the horse eat grass. It has formed a situation that a swift horse can only be beautiful if it lacks food, and it is impossible to wait for a horse. This has caused two consequences: one is to suppress talents, bury talents, and let talents remain unknown in small circles all their lives. Second, talents cannot be retained, which leads to the outflow of talents whenever there is an opportunity. The talents we have worked so hard to cultivate are used by foreign units, even foreign countries, especially hostile countries. Cause unnecessary losses. For example, frequent job-hopping between units is evidence.
On talents "talents" are people with both ability and political integrity, and people with special skills. "Talent", what a proud word. But I think talents must have virtue first, and some people's virtue, virtue and virtue are the first. If a person has special technical expertise and lacks virtue, then the more knowledge he has, the greater the harm to society.
In a certain year, Shanghai Meilong Town Square recruited "Young Ambassadors" with an annual salary of 654.38+0.6 million. 16 college students enter the final stage. The test question is: Who do you think will be elected as the youth ambassador this time? The questioner's purpose is to make the contestants increase their psychological endurance and show their tolerance and mind through cooperation. Unexpectedly, what happened on the field was "who will replace me", "unlike a bag of grass embroidered with pillows" and "wise pigs", attacking each other and slandering their opponents at will.
Today's society is developing rapidly and the competition is becoming increasingly fierce. Do you win by slandering and attacking the other side or by cooperation and competition? The answer is obviously the latter, because vilification and attacking the other side can only lose both sides, which is a "cold war" thinking. Cooperation is win-win and mutually beneficial. Only cooperation can make society more orderly and regular, and society can function and progress normally.
Human virtue is really important. Virtue is like 1, and other professional skills and talents are like 0. There is no 1 in front, and there are many zeros behind! Therefore, everyone can only become a noble person from 1, a person with a sea of mind and a mountain of tolerance.