It was not until Si Manan raised a series of questions that Lenovo's historical problems were exposed to the public again. What are the problems? How should Lenovo Liu Chuanzhi respond?
Under the leadership of Liu Chuanzhi, Lenovo has made many brilliant market achievements, and it is not the first time that its sales volume ranks first in the world. But for such market performance, it is nothing in the eyes of most people. Maybe I will praise Lenovo for its good marketing methods, but I want to count how many core technologies Lenovo has mastered, but I can't find them.
Because there is no core technology available, the outside world has doubts about whether Lenovo is a technology company. Lenovo's revenue is good, why is the proportion of investment in research and development only about 3% every year? Where did Lenovo's money go?
Si Manan seems to have given the answer. Among the six questions Si Manan asked Lenovo before, whether the salary of Lenovo executives and Liu Chuanzhi's pension were as high as 1 100 million yuan were among them.
If the executive compensation is really too high and Liu Chuanzhi's pension reaches 1 billion, then it is understandable that R&D investment is relatively small. Less investment in scientific research, but willing to spend money on executives.
Because of this series of problems, Lenovo is once again at the forefront. But Si Manan's questioning is only the beginning, which leads to more inside information and more people's participation.
For example, Hu Xijin suggested that Lenovo's high salary of hundreds of millions or tens of millions is unreasonable, and Lenovo should make adjustments. In addition, Xia, a former cadre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, came forward to support Ni Guangnan, the former chief engineer of Lenovo and later dismissed by Lenovo.
In addition, Su Li, a management consulting expert, reported a Lenovo shareholder and pointed out some inaction and unfair behaviors.
Things have become more and more complicated, and Lenovo events have also become more changeable. At first, Si Manan may just want Lenovo to respond to relevant questions, but at this time, it is estimated that it is too late for people who eat melons to receive new news.
From the beginning to the end, Lenovo only made an irrelevant response, saying that in the equity transfer with the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the procedures were complete and there were no problems. But Si Manan and the public didn't buy it. Si Manan bluntly said that it can't be like this, and more people are question marks.
The implication is that there is still uncertainty about whether Lenovo has lost state-owned assets. Just relying on Lenovo's own response doesn't mean anything. It's like a person suspected of being a thief telling himself in his own house that he didn't steal anything. The thief thinks he knows it very well, but everything he does is fair and comfortable.
In fact, no one wants Lenovo to develop into such a situation. They have great expectations for Lenovo from the beginning.
Many people compare Lenovo with Huawei. Lenovo has a deeper foundation than Huawei. Lenovo was founded by Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 1 and has a state-owned background. Ren Zheng Fei can only create a world by himself.
Twenty or thirty years later, Lenovo and Huawei have very different images in the eyes of the world.
Lenovo has changed from an enterprise controlled by Chinese Academy of Sciences 100% to a private company headed by Liu and Yang. Even if there were systems and measures for share reform at that time, who knows if there are shady manipulations and means in the process?
It seems that in order to explore this matter, it is reported that the state has set up an investigation team. According to Si Manan's post, the above people have set up an investigation team and should re-investigate the past. Can Liu Chuanzhi fool the past and see nature?
If there was really nothing in those days, would an investigation team be set up now? Perhaps it is necessary to take it out again because there is doubt. Even with a long history, you can always find clues in the long river of history.
How should Liu Chuanzhi respond? If Si Manan's news is correct, it may really depend on nature.
Because there is no doubt that Liu Chuanzhi has the final say, who knows what the truth is. Liu Chuanzhi's only response is to let nature take its course. If he tries to change everything and cover up some historical traces, once he is found, he should be careful.
Liu Chuanzhi's era is coming to an end. After this controversial period, it may come to an end with the establishment of the national investigation team.
However, there is no official announcement about the investigation team. It remains to be seen whether Si Manan wants to confuse Lenovo with showstopper or has another purpose. But considering Si Manan's reputation and influence in the industry, it is not impossible to get some news that the public can't get. Besides, this matter is so serious that Si Manan is unlikely to talk nonsense. There's probably some movement.
The era of Liu Chuanzhi has become a thing of the past, and Lenovo should set new goals if it wants to continue on the road of scientific and technological development. You can't always rely on "trade technology", you have to have core technology when necessary.
Lenovo should pursue the starry sky of science and technology, not just make money for itself, but ignore the responsibility of an enterprise to the country and society. Lenovo executives can get high salaries, but they should make corresponding contributions. The best way to break public opinion is to speak with strength and prove everything with core technology.