The villagers recalled that one night in August, 20 13, 138 mu of grain field planted with crops was suddenly razed overnight by eight excavators. At that time, corn and soybeans were almost ripe.
As for the leveled crops, the villagers said that they had made many inquiries and reports to the village committee, the street office, pingdu city and Qingdao, suspecting that the cultivated land had been sold, but to no avail.
According to public information, the "Kaiyuan City" project, known as the "benchmarking project of government image display", covers a total area of about 4 100 mu, with a total construction area of about 3.6 million square meters and an investment of 654,380+0.6 billion yuan, adjacent to the pingdu city municipal government.
According to the regulations of pingdu city, the land involved will be compensated according to the highest evaluation standard, with compensation of 25,000 yuan/mu and compensation of young crops and ground attachments of about 3.4 million yuan. According to the market valuation, the price of land expropriated in Pingdu, Shandong Province exceeded 654.38 billion yuan, but the villagers only got 8 million yuan.
In this incident, the compensation for land acquisition and demolition is controversial. Dujiatuan Village Committee arranged 80% of the compensation fee of more than 6 million yuan to compensate the landless farmers, and each person only got 6,800 yuan in food subsidies. Some landless peasants did not receive it because the compensation standard was too low. According to the regulations of pingdu city, 30% of the net income from land transfer belongs to the village collectives and villagers. However, this "land dividend" of 6.5438+0.5279 million yuan has not been distributed to the villagers so far. This means that villagers and village collectives can only get a quarter of the land "cake" worth more than 654.38 billion yuan. Even so, the villagers still can't get the full amount, only get a total compensation of more than 8 million yuan, in fact, at the expense of losing 17 of the land contracting right.
On March 3, 20 14, some villagers saw the construction team building an office building inside the enclosure, saying that "the land may have been sold". Under this suspicion, on March 5, 20 14, villagers set up tents at the door of the developer's office, and the villagers selected personnel to be on duty day and night. The villagers agreed that if there is danger, gong should be sounded as a signal. March 20 14 15, the gong sounded for the first time.
The villagers said that on that day, about twenty or thirty unidentified young men went to the tent to make trouble and threaten.
Li Yalin, a villager, suspected that the gang was sent by the developer. Li Yalin remembers a man named David Sun.
"He is the leader of this group. He entered the village in March 12. " On the day of 12, Sun and another man claimed to be sent by the developer and went to his house to ask, "Why not let us construct?"
Say that finish, Li Yalin took out his mobile phone video, two people to leave.
The battle of 14 in March 15 is obviously not comparable to that of three days ago.
Seeing the crowd, some villagers knocked gongs, other villagers quickly gathered and rushed to the tent with shovels and other agricultural tools, and this group of talents left.
A number of villagers said that some members of the construction team told them that the construction team had received orders from their superiors and had to start work before March 25th 14. But they didn't say who the "superior" was.
According to the agreement of the villagers, the tent is a "stronghold". During the day, more than 40 villagers will strengthen their vigilance around the tent and be on duty together. After 10 in the evening, most people went home to sleep, leaving four people to watch in the tent every night. In order to prevent the sneak attack at night, the villagers on duty don't take off their clothes when they sleep, and they are always vigilant.
As you can see at the scene yesterday, the tent is about 20 square meters, and there are five simple trampolines in it. The villagers said that in order to prevent "social people" from making trouble, we also got four fire extinguishers in case of emergency. But the fire broke out in the early hours of yesterday morning, and four fire extinguishers have not come in handy. Two of them also exploded in the fire. According to the report, Pingdu police quickly rushed to the scene to investigate and have now filed a case for investigation. The main leaders of Pingdu Municipal Party Committee and Municipal Government attached great importance to it, and demanded that the elite forces be organized to solve the case as soon as possible and deal with it strictly according to law.
Public security organs put on record for investigation.
Yesterday, pingdu city's official Weibo "Pingdu Release" said that at 2 1 day 1 50, the makeshift tent set up by villagers in Dujiatuan Village, Chaoyang Road, Fengtai Street caught fire, and the fire was put out at about 2: 30, covering an area of about 20 square meters. 1 people living in tents died and 3 people were burned. Among them, the deceased was 62 years old and had suffered from a stroke and was slow to move. The injured have been taken to hospital for treatment. The casualties of villagers are individual villagers in Dujiatuan village who disagree with the land income distribution method of the village Committee.
The director of Pingdu village promised not to sell land.
The reporter's investigation found that Cui Lianmou, one of the suspected contractors, also filmed a film reflecting the achievements of local new rural construction as a producer, and Du Qunmou, another suspected village director, promised the village name that he would never sell a penny of land. 20 14 At 2: 55 on March 22nd, about 200 riot police (villagers visually observed) rushed to the tent site where the fire broke out yesterday morning 1 4, and snatched the body of Geng Fulin, a villager from Dujiatuan Village, Fengtai Sub-district Office in Pingdu. Geng Fulin, a villager who guarded the developed business district and prevented the developer from constructing, was burned to death yesterday morning. Developed business districts account for more than 30 mu of cultivated land/kloc-0.
There are contradictions in local land acquisition.
According to the introduction of the people at the scene, Dujiatuan village has had contradictions caused by land acquisition since last year. Dujiatuan Village and Dongguan Village, the neighboring village, have a total land of 130 mu. According to the villagers, this land has been enclosed since September of 13. The other party said it was a government act, but could not come up with any formalities. The villagers obstructed the construction and the two sides clashed many times. Many villagers' homes were smashed with glass, cars were chopped and smashed, and explosives were thrown at home. The alarm was fruitless. The villagers repeatedly asked the village Committee, the street office and the municipal government to reflect the situation, but failed. /kloc-from March 5, 0/4, villagers took turns to be on duty at the gate of the construction site to prevent construction vehicles from entering the construction and safeguard their own rights and interests. On March 8, the villagers set up a 20-square-meter tent near the entrance to the construction site, where people live every night.
On June 5438+05, six cars pulled more than 20 young men to the door of the construction site, threatening the villagers to stop obstructing the construction. The villagers drove them away with shovels and other agricultural tools. 2 1 in the early morning, the villagers' tents that were guarding the ground caught fire.
065438+On March 2, 20041,an arson case occurred in Dujiatuan Village, Fengtai Street, pingdu city, causing one death and three injuries. After the incident, the Shandong Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and the leaders of the Qingdao Municipal Party Committee and Municipal Government attached great importance to it, demanding that while finding out the facts and severely punishing arson suspects according to law, we should further find out the problems of individual grassroots leading cadres who ignored the reasonable demands of the masses and neglected their duties. The provincial and municipal commission for discipline inspection set up a joint investigation team to seriously investigate and verify the cause of the incident, the demands of the masses and the performance of duties by relevant functional departments. After more than 20 days of in-depth and meticulous investigation and evidence collection, the joint investigation team formed the Investigation Report on the "3.21"incident in pingdu city and the Opinions on Accountability to Relevant Personnel. According to the relevant procedures, the leaders of Pingdu Municipal Party Committee and Municipal Government, the main person in charge of Fengtai Sub-district Office and other 12 responsible persons were held accountable for party discipline and political discipline, and the handling opinions were put in place at the end of April. Specifically: 1, Runzhi Niu, member of the Standing Committee of Pingdu Municipal Committee and executive deputy mayor, as the leader of the municipal party committee and municipal government in charge of letters and visits, ignored the villagers' petitions, took the leadership responsibility for the incident, and gave the party a warning.
2. Liu Yuming, deputy mayor of pingdu city Municipal Government and secretary of the Party Working Committee of Development Zone, as the leader of the municipal government in charge of urban and rural construction management, paid insufficient attention to villagers' petitions, urged relevant departments and units to publicize and explain relevant policies, took leadership responsibility for the incident and gave administrative demerits.
3. Fu Qiang, secretary of the Party Working Committee of Fengtai Sub-district Office, made improper decisions on the internal distribution of village collective assets income, did not seriously implement the key supervision letter of village letters and visits, took the main leadership responsibility, and gave him the punishment of revoking his post within the party.
4. Lu Zhongke (without party affiliation), director of Fengtai Sub-district Office, did not perform his duties in place and his working methods were simple, which led to the escalation of contradictions. Take the main leadership responsibility and give administrative dismissal.
5. Gu Xiujun, member of the Party Working Committee of Fengtai Sub-district Office and secretary of the district where Dujiatuan Village is located, paid insufficient attention to the petition work of the village, and the measures to resolve contradictions were ineffective and improper. He is directly responsible for it and is given disciplinary action to revoke his position within the party.
6. Li Shenglong, director of the People's Congress Office of Fengtai Sub-district Office, as the leader in charge of letters and visits, paid insufficient attention to the letters and visits in the village and failed to resolve contradictions. He is the person who is directly responsible and gives the party a serious warning.
7. Xiu Linwu, secretary of the Disciplinary Committee of Fengtai Street, failed to urge relevant personnel to properly solve the problem of letters and visits in the village, and was responsible for supervision and gave warnings within the party.
8. Lin, the director of Xiangdian police station, failed to take effective preventive measures against villagers' obstruction of construction and other security risks, and was given administrative punishment.
9. Li Guangzhong, the person in charge of Dujiatuan village section of Xiangdian police station, failed to take effective preventive measures against villagers' obstruction of construction and other security risks, and was given administrative demerit.
10, Yuan, a member of pingdu city Land and Resources Law Enforcement and Supervision Brigade (then deputy director of the Land Appraisal Management Office of pingdu city Land and Resources Bureau in 2006), as the chief of the land acquisition business department, was directly responsible for failing to recognize the false signatures of the representatives of the masses in the Certificate of Waiver of Hearing, and was given administrative demerit.
1 1. Li Jingjun, deputy director of the office of Pingdu Municipal Committee, deputy director of the mass work department and director of the Bureau of Letters and Calls, did not pay attention to the villagers' petition, which constituted a mistake of dereliction of duty and was given a warning within the party.
12, Jiang Dongxing, deputy director of pingdu city Bureau of Letters and Calls, turned a blind eye to the villagers' petition, and failed to put forward opinions and suggestions to the municipal party committee and municipal government in time on sensitive petition issues involving the distribution of village collective assets income, which constituted a mistake of dereliction of duty and gave the party a serious warning.
The Commission for Discipline Inspection of Qingdao requested that the Pingdu Municipal Party Committee and Municipal Government should learn profound lessons from the "3.21"incident, draw inferences from others, correctly handle the relationship between reform, development and stability, enhance political awareness, sense of responsibility and awareness of law and discipline, especially in the land acquisition issue, adhere to scientific, democratic and legal procedures, further stand firm on the mass position, take the mass line well, do mass work well and protect the masses.