One of the reasons: the "three good" selection can inspire the advanced.

Associate Professor Guo, director of the Department of Psychology, School of Education, Shenyang Normal University, believes that the "three good students" selection system is reasonable. The selection of "three good students" is to select outstanding students with all-round development in morality, intelligence and physique, with the purpose of encouraging the advanced, setting an example among students and driving other students to make progress together. As far as the system itself is concerned, the evaluation of "three good" is progressive. However, there are disadvantages in the specific selection process. The most prominent problem is the evaluation criteria of "three good students", including good health, good thinking and good study. However, many schools simplify "three good" to "one good" in operation, and academic performance replaces moral quality and physical quality as the only evaluation standard. Director Guo believes that the selection of "three good students" should comprehensively assess students' comprehensive quality, and the selection criteria should highlight students' moral quality rather than academic performance.

The second reason: Three Good Awards make children progress.

Xiao Tao, a fifth-grade student in Shenyang Second Economics and Second School, is the beneficiary of the "three good students" system. He is very puzzled by the idea of canceling the selection of miyoshi students. According to Xiao Tao's mother, Xiao Tao used to be a naughty boy with strong hands-on ability, but he didn't study hard and his grades were only above average in his class. In the third grade, he was nominated as a candidate for "three good students" because of winning prizes for his handmade works, but he was unsuccessful because of his poor grades. The child was depressed at that time. Realizing that poor grades were the reason for losing the election, he studied hard. Now the results have come up, and I have been rated as "three good students" for two consecutive years.

The choice is unfair.

One of the reasons: the incentive function has been lost. "The' miyoshi students' evaluated by the school are actually several people every year. For them, winning the prize is irrelevant, as if it should be; In the eyes of others, the selection of' three good students' has nothing to do with themselves. In this way, the incentive and demonstration role that the selection of' three good' should have lost its value of existence. " President Cheng of Beilingjie Primary School said that their school no longer selected "three good students" this year, but instead selected various pacesetter titles. As long as students have special skills, they can participate in the selection of the top ten campus stars, which can stimulate students' self-motivation more than simply selecting "three good students"

The second reason: unfair selection.

Ms. He's son works in a media company. He was named "three good students" four times in six semesters in the third grade. However, she still believes that the current "three good students" selection should be changed. "There is nothing wrong with judging the' three good students' from the starting point, but in the specific operation process, because it involves various interests, especially after being linked to further studies, the selection results can no longer represent their advanced nature, which is not standardized, unfair and unjust." She suggested that there should be a more advanced evaluation of personal qualities and the evaluation system should be more scientific and sound. At the same time, linking evaluation with further research should be abolished.

The third reason: selection dispels enthusiasm.

When talking about the evaluation of "three good students", he just graduated from a primary school in Dadong District, and he seems very helpless. He said that every time he got three good grades in the exam, his classmates pulled his ticket. Anyway, he can't choose for himself, so he might as well give it to someone else. In Yao Ming's view, his grades are poor, and it has nothing to do with him to comment on "three good students" No matter how hard you try, you can't evaluate it. Over time, you don't have to work hard. He said that if the school held a single selection, he would definitely be rated as a sports star. Our reporter Li Mingxin Intern Huang Xuejiao Lin Changqiang