Refutation: If doing good deeds becomes grabbing red envelopes and being a good person can make you rich, then there are no good people and bad people in the world, only businessmen. Refuting the argument of directly connecting oneself: the principle of economics
Parameters:
Argument 1: Red envelopes do not make effective use of public resources.
The wool is on the sheep, and the money in the red envelope comes from the taxes of ordinary people and belongs to public resources. We should make maximum use of public resources and solve problems most effectively. Take giving up your seat as an example. Instead of tossing people to give up their seats with red envelopes, it is better to open a new bus to improve the capacity and solve the problem completely.
Summary: The correct distribution and use of public resources is a big red envelope for all the public.
Argument 2: Red envelopes will give people who don't want to do good deeds the best excuse. Instead of encouraging them, they will discourage them from doing good deeds.
Economic benefits are not the reason why people do or don't do good things. Many times, we don't do good deeds, probably because we have been cheated before, being smart enough to protect ourselves and being timid. When we don't do good deeds for these reasons, we will at least be condemned by our conscience and feel that we should actually do it.
But if there is a red envelope, then "I am not greedy for money" will replace heavy reflection and become the best excuse for not doing good. Unloading the psychological burden makes people feel at ease not to do good deeds.
Argument 3: Red envelopes defile the pride of ordinary people beyond material things.
People don't live just for money. Sometimes people have an impulse to help others without asking for anything in return. This impulse is the heroic dream of ordinary life. This kind of red envelope is actually a stain on the good man and his greatness. Take the white old man as an example. If you give him a red envelope because of his life's efforts, you are actually saying that he doesn't deserve greatness.
Argument 4: Doing good deeds has great value in itself, which cannot be compensated by any red envelope.
Doing a good deed itself will send a "red envelope", which contains incomparable value. Defending the rights of Samsung mobile phones with the old days (Samsung is actually silent? Without subtitles? ! I insist on boldly reminding everyone here that Samsung mobile phones will explode, and if they explode, they will deny it, bullying China consumers with deep pockets! For example, in the end, his victory was not only that the court awarded him a laptop, but that an international consortium understood the insistence of China consumers, which could not be compensated by any red envelope. And the world was changed by people like Lao Hui.
It is useless to encourage people to do good deeds and emphasize material rewards. It is to make people understand that some things may have no price, but they are valuable, so people will do them.
I support Yang Qi's new rule that the planet will give red envelopes to those who do good deeds.
Argument 1: Giving red envelopes to good people is to promote social integrity. Why can bad people live in the present and enjoy spicy food, while good people have to delay satisfaction? Let good people get rich and famous.
Argument 2: The essence of making a good red envelope is to maximize social welfare, fair competition and specialization by using the operating principle of market economy.
There is nothing wrong with combining good deeds with economic interests. History has proved countless times that market economy will not bring disaster, but it can greatly stimulate people's enthusiasm and creativity and make society flourish.
Historical practice has proved countless times that medical care, education, health and even all aspects of people's lives can become more prosperous and beautiful under the command of market economy. Good deeds will not be concealed by the interests of the market economy, but will get better and better.
Two arguments about opening a bar Zhan Qingyun vs Yang Qixin
Zhan Qingyun: There is no problem with the reward afterwards. You already know that there are red envelopes to do good deeds beforehand, and white old people can't escape the accusation of being greedy for money and fame.
Yang Qixin: It's no problem to give red envelopes to the old white man, so that he can do more good deeds and lead a more decent life.
Zhan Qingyun: You made a reward policy before and after his death, not a policy that made it impossible for him to be a good person.
Yang Qixin: It's normal to cheer for good people and make donations. How can it be morally bankrupt? Don't be so dark, it's all dark clouds.
Zhan Qingyun: I am not a dark cloud because society still allows me to be a good person. On the contrary, the red envelope you mentioned can repay the mortgage. What is social inflation?
Yang Qixin: (passive defense) I just said that red envelopes can help a little, but I didn't say that I could return them all.
Zhan Qingyun: Money doesn't fall from the sky. How much will the price of red envelopes go up? Inflation can't be avoided.
The opposing sides are arguing over the new rules of Mix's wonderful planet. The planet will give red envelopes to those who do good deeds. I don't support it.
Argument 1: Giving a red envelope benefits not those who do good deeds, but those who are good at exploiting loopholes. The weak can do nothing, wait for others' help, and then give out red envelopes, but the efforts become meaningless.
Argument 2: In order to help others get red envelopes, good people will not do good things. From now on, good people will never observe who needs help. As long as he gets out of the way with a red envelope to do good for others, he can feel at ease.
Argument 3: Many good deeds are invisible to the eyes and can only be experienced with the heart. Such good deeds will not be rewarded. We will never lack good people, and we will never lack good things to be seen. What we lack is never the eyes to find good people and deeds. What we lack is a heart that can perceive the invisible kindness of others!
Good deeds can be divided into actions and omissions. It is not a good thing to give up your seat voluntarily. It is also a good thing not to occupy that position from the beginning and leave it to others. It was the miracle doctor who pulled you back from the new year's death line. It is also a doctor who silently takes care of you, but under the system of giving red envelopes to good people, the latter is invisible. It encourages people to see good things to praise.
Argument 4: Good deeds are rewarded, and goodwill transmission will build a better world, and the ultimate benefit will be yourself.
In the process of people's growth, it is those who sincerely help us without asking for anything in return that have established a beautiful bond between us and the world (this scene is sensational max).
And our sincere gratitude is already a red envelope for good people.
I support the new regulation of Liang Qiuyang's Wonderful Planet that the planet will give red envelopes to those who do good deeds.
Refutation:
Refute the contradiction of Mix: Since you think that a few red envelopes can turn good people into businessmen (Mix's argument 2), that is to say, you think that human nature is dark, what about the expectation of human nature (Mix's argument 4) and the inheritance of goodwill?
Refuting Zhan Qingyun's implicit presupposition: the premise that social resources can be used to directly solve problems is unlimited resources (Zhan Qingyun's argument 1), but this is impossible. It is precisely because we can't solve the problem in one step by opening a new bus, so in the case of insufficient resources, we have to rely on good people to solve the problem indirectly.
Parameters:
Argument 1: Red envelopes are not economic compensation. They express social recognition of good people in the form of economic compensation.
Argument 2: pushing morality to the altar at the price that no one wants to go up again; Let the good people live well, and only then will there be social benefits.
Promoting morality to "selfless dedication of good people" and "sacrifice to the end" has aesthetic value, and no one wants to follow suit in reality. Giving red envelopes to good people to make them live well will have social benefits and inspire more people to do good deeds.
Argument 3: Creating Kindness
People are not born kind or indifferent. Kindness is shaped by experiences in details. Giving red envelopes is such a detail. Letting ordinary people choose kindness at a delicate moment includes recognition and encouragement. It allows the red envelope to say thank you when the person who is helped forgets to say thank you. This is how kindness is passed down.
It is positively said that Liang Qiuyang's wonderful planet has new regulations, and the planet will give red envelopes to those who do good deeds. I support it.
Argument 1: Morality that is easily defiled is not true morality. Even if paid, people can know what they have to do and what they want to do.
Argument 2: This question is actually predicting people's hearts. Speculators can actually go back and look for it themselves. When you set in your mind that good people in this world will become mercenary when they get red envelopes, society will really become like that.
Argument 3: Let's be gentle with good people (let them benefit) and the world will become better.
The opposing side argued about the new rules of Mix wonderful planet. The planet will give red envelopes to those who do good deeds. I don't support it.
Argument 1: the morality said by the other party is not easy to be defiled. In fact, it is because morality comes from environmental education, but isn't giving a red envelope just domesticating people with money? A small heart will eventually become a big business.
Argument 2: People are good at exaggerating their forgetting of gratitude. Sending good people away with red envelopes will only turn others' help into natural knowledge payment. Kindness and gratitude can only be conveyed without red envelopes.