2) Abstract, the abstract part is different according to the requirements of the journal. Generally speaking, these projects are usually used to organize: background, methods, results and conclusions. Simply put, the abstract is divided into four parts:
1. Background: Understand what is a scientific question and the questions to be answered;
2. Method: Provide a very short and explainable topic or the method you use to investigate and study the problem;
3. Results: Only the core results or main findings of the research are given;
4. Conclusion: Describe the importance of your findings, their significance and their impact on this field.
3) Introduction
Background is very important to attract readers' attention. Especially in the process of paper submission, the background part must arouse the interest of reviewers and want to read more. If the commentator sees it, think to himself, "Why didn't I think of this?" This is half the battle before the results are announced. In the introduction, explain why you did this research, what you hope to achieve with it, and how it constitutes a useful supplement to the existing evidence system on this topic.
Paragraph 1: Expand the background. Explain the importance of this research to some fields, science or technology, and tell readers or commentators how important this topic is.
The second paragraph: explain the problem. In this context, explain what needs to be broken through, and explain the proven or controversial scientific "loopholes" that this study tries to fill or solve.
The third paragraph: put forward a hypothesis. Explain what hypothesis you want to test. Why?
4) method
The method section aims to provide a repeatable method that allows others to recreate the information needed for analysis under the same data. It should accurately describe how to collect, organize and analyze data related to research purposes. The method part describes the research process, from how to choose samples to what statistical methods to use to analyze the data.
5) results
The results section describes what you observed or analyzed, without comment or discussion.
In the result part, you don't need to describe the specific method, you just need to give the result, and you don't need to comment or explain. Therefore, phrases like "surprisingly" or "interestingly" are usually considered inappropriate in the result part. Similarly, in theory, you should describe the results of each method outlined in the methods section and display the results in the same order as the methods, so that the article is easier to understand and read.
6) discussion
The discussion section focuses on the importance of explaining the results and how they are combined with the overall situation of the report observed and confirmed on the same topic.
First, briefly review the main findings of your research. It is best to use the same expression as in the introduction and method, and then explain the research results. Don't simply repeat the results or over-explain when explaining.
Then combining the results with other reports is an important part of the discussion. How do your results compare with other reports in the literature? If your findings are different, do you have any reasonable explanation? Any particularly surprising or interesting findings should be discussed and possible explanations put forward. In addition, we should go beyond paying attention to individual results and explain the overall significance when all studies are combined and analyzed.
7) Reference
List all the data sources you use as the basis for preparing your hypothesis and establish your research foundation. These references will support your work, put it in the background of other studies on the same topic, and provide guidance for readers who want to read the topic further. It is really a small problem for beginners to judge when they need to cite references. Basically, any idea or fact from other sources needs the support of references.
If you need thesis counseling, please feel free to contact Yingcaijun ~