Wang Hailin, who claimed to be a screenwriter, continued to fall into the shortage of works, claiming to be a film critic who manipulated the award scandal, pretending that the people were sitting on 14 companies and quietly building an empire of the capital industry chain. What is the truth behind these dazzling operations? When Wang Hailin unscrupulously led the misguided group of 227 minors to attack artists and the legal order, everything was completely solved. This is the drama of naked vicious competition of capital.
Screenwriter? Film critic? Capitalist? Which is its true identity? It can only be said that in this greedy and stinking entertainment circle, there are no multiple identities that can't afford to play infernal affairs, just as those professional black powder and leather powder can't afford to play palace fights. Under the cover of multiple identities, Wang Hailin can privately lay out its own industrial empire, reach strategic cooperation with industrial capital, and actively build a multi-party interactive platform of "screenwriter, investor, actor, film and television drama production and distribution to consumers". While hiding the identity of capital in their own circles, they use the other two identities to serve vicious competition and capital interests.
Why doesn't the screenwriter say anything? Because ambition is not here, my mind is full of vicious competition and capital pursuit for profit. Why do film critics abuse the right to vote and advocate revenge? Because this itself is a smoke bomb that directly participates in vicious competition to suppress artists by using the status of judges, it not only tries to discredit artists under competitive capital, but more importantly, it calls on those incited underage groups who hate artists to continue social death persecution through public opinion and order impact, and then bring down competitors.
The relationship between Wang Hailin and hate organizations is inextricably linked, chaotic and inextricably linked. Before the illegal hate organization 227 Heichao was banned, Wang Hailin privately undertook the intelligence liaison work after the members of the organization were bombed. After 227 Chaohua was blocked, its members flocked to Weibo in the next season, raised the banner and continued the unfinished hate cause. Even turned to offline demonstrations to destroy, seriously undermining social order and stability.
At the same time, Wang Hailin continues to weave the fallacy that "fans pay for their idols".
Based on his latest Weibo viewpoint, this paper will refute his assertion from the third angle: the nature, foundation and potential risks of fan organizations, and explore ways to fundamentally solve the potential problems of fan organizations.
First, Wang Hailin mentioned that fans set up organizations, and then echoed and attacked the awards. Therefore, it is considered a crime to convict fans and eventually join competitors. Then the problem is coming.
1, attack the prize. Is this a question of taking responsibility?
2. If so, who should bear joint and several liability?
First of all, look at the fees and attack awards. This is purely a matter of angle. I started with a foul-mouthed revenge sermon, and "Public Comment" said that his objection was an attack. Isn't this self-deception and unreasonable? If there is any charge, it is that Wang Hailin, as a practitioner in the entertainment circle, has to bear the private use of public equipment first, can't accept the criticism of the audience, and then narrowly reverse right and wrong. Is it shameless to think that the audience's soft persimmon is easy to pinch and maliciously framed? Speaking of attacks, Wang Hailin's tucao conference was publicly criticized by a man named Jeffrey. Didn't you say that the other party dared not say anything because of his background? This kind of public humiliation is humble, and audience criticism is called attack? Is it the nature of capital to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages? It is shameless not to have a lower limit.
Let's talk about organizational problems first. Although it is completely decriminalized, it is purely a slap in the face. Hai Wang Lin Fei convicted it from a personal point of view, and then put it on the group behavior at the organizational level for joint action. Then it is necessary to discuss who should participate from the nature and mechanism of the organization.
In essence, the fan organization is just an interest alliance on the Internet. This interest alliance has never heard of anyone being responsible, it is joint and several, just legal and platform supervision. But why are fan organizations an exception? This is of course directly related to the trap of vicious competition in the entertainment industry. Why are rice circles criticized as foul? The root cause is still the industry habit of scheming, infernal affairs and manipulating fans to engage in opposition in the entertainment industry. Therefore, if we want to be in line with the entertainment circle, we must express our feelings to the central authorities and take this opportunity to vigorously rectify the entertainment circle and eliminate the black industrial chain. Only in this way can we fundamentally put an end to the tearing of rice circles and the prevalence of joint fallacy.
Thirdly, judging from the emergence process of fan organizations, the establishment of fan organizations is completely spontaneous and does not require the approval of favorite artists. Who you like is also a fan's right, and artists have not stopped fans from liking or hating themselves. That's why there are two camps: red powder and black powder.
So, there must be a connection with the artist. Lin Qiang insisted irrationally that fan organizations were established for artists, and artists were the beneficiaries. Therefore, artists should bear the responsibility, not to mention the establishment of fan organizations is not necessarily for artists, but more for their own spiritual preferences. Even for the sake of artists, do you have to join artists? So, China was founded for the people of China. Under the leadership of the Party, people's life has undergone earth-shaking changes and they have lived a rich life, which is a direct beneficiary. Is it because of this that the corruption and violation of discipline of individual members of the party will be linked with the people? Responsible to the people? How strange? Therefore, a political party can't guarantee that there will be locusts who disobey the sun, so it will not engage in intra-party cooperation, but will deal with it in accordance with national laws and party discipline. The fan organization can't guarantee that it won't be mixed with black powder and skinnickers with ulterior motives. Why do they have a group association when something goes wrong?
Therefore, for the sake of artists, this theory is simply not enough to be a reason for alliance. Moreover, from the perspective of interests, fans will also spend money related to artists in an unorganized way, because fans spend money purely to meet their spiritual needs and have nothing to do with the establishment of an organization. In a word, whether it is beneficial or not, joint action can only be handled according to facts and law and discipline. Corruption within the party is implicated by people who know and participate together, and it will not be irrelevant in a large area. It is even less relevant to those who are served and benefited.
Then back to the question of fan organizations, who should bear joint and several liability. Judging from the emergence process of fan organizations, anyone or group who wants to set up an organization must need a venue or related audit procedures. To set up a company, an individual or legal person must have a business place, and then provide relevant materials and information according to law, which can only be established after approval by the industrial and commercial department. So any company or organization with problems, the masses and even competitors can report to the industry and commerce. However, similar drug trafficking and pornography-related organizations cannot obtain business licenses from the public and commercial sectors. If such a criminal organization is approved by the industry and commerce, and the business scope of the business license says drug trafficking, kidnapping and pyramid selling, the industry and commerce department will investigate the responsibility.
Then look at the process of establishing a fan organization. First of all, as a network interest alliance, it must rely on a specific network platform and cannot operate in a vacuum. Moreover, staying on the network platform to set up a super-calling organization must be approved by the platform. Therefore, whether this institution has problems in the early or late stage of the audit, the platform should bear joint and several liability. So be responsible for the platform. Because of unprovable individual behavior in the organization, Wang Hailin engages in group association, which is tantamount to the behavior of a crazy butcher.
Finally, discuss the risk that the large-scale gathering of fan organizations may be manipulated by vicious competition in the entertainment industry.
Compared with Wang Hailin who criticizes a certain fan group for the benefit and tries his best to disintegrate the competitive market, as an ordinary consumer outside the rice circle, I think the fundamental solution to the problem of tearing rice circles is to dissolve all organizations that talk about artists' consumption. Avoid disputes caused by collective group behavior, and put an end to putting consumers in the visible range of the whole black industrial chain and letting them be slaughtered.
Let the industrial chain of the whole industry compete blindly there. Who will play the role in the investment TV series and who will bear the advertising endorsement? Please rely on blind cats to kill mice in the whole industry chain. Don't call the whole industry crazy to hit the list and then gather consumers to slaughter. To appeal to the list, the original sin is not in the relevant industrial chain? The list of rotten streets reveals fanaticism, all of which show greed for interests, and do everything possible to empty consumers' wallets and implant all possible votes. Without a list, where can fans call for a list? Finally, it is shameless to put the blame on consumers. I dare to call for the cancellation of all list-playing organizations and organizations with super fans. Dare Wang Hailin? If he dares, the whole industry will not eat him alive. Therefore, Wang Hailin only dares to treat the end consumer groups as soft persimmons, which is framed. Typical shameless person who avoids the heavy and takes the light, bullies the weak and fears the hard.
However, it is a mistake to warn the end users in Linzhi, Hai Wang that they are never soft persimmons, and they can do whatever they want you to do. The result must be shooting yourself in the foot. First of all, politically, we are the masters of the country, with supreme dignity and inviolable rights. Secondly, economically, we are the food and clothing parents of the entertainment circle, we are gods, and we have inviolable legal consumption rights. I can't let you maliciously frame it. A group of buffoons, for the sake of profit, think that singing old and bad dramas can turn the sky upside down. Sooner or later, you will realize the overwhelming power of the people and the unquestionable majesty of national laws.
Share to
West Zhuyuehua County