2011February 15 02:35 Jinghua Times Land and developers have become the "source of corruption" for some officials.
2011-02-1517: 37: 00 Source: People's Daily Online (Beijing) Post Bar 0 Mobile Phone Watch News People's Daily Online Hainan Window Commentator: Dan Liang.
Developers bypass the land acquisition process, privately occupy collective land at low prices, then buy off government officials and resell them to the government at high prices to become "state-owned", and officials and businessmen form an "interest transfer" alliance. According to reports, this major case of land corruption in Dongfang City, Hainan Province has led to 25 cadres, including the former mayor, the former deputy secretary of the municipal party committee and the heads of departments such as land, construction and urban investment. Recently, Tan Dengyao, the former mayor of Dongfang City, was sentenced to 18 years.
It is also a "land nest case" in which developers are involved. Trading power and money, including the mayor, 25 leading cadres in the east were dragged down by land, buildings and developers. Such collective and large-scale corruption was enough to shock the political circles inside and outside the province. With the rapid development of economy and the increasing shortage of land resources, land and developers have actually become the "source of corruption" for some officials.
In 2009, Haikou Planning Bureau land nest case; 20 10 seven officials of the three-level land department of cities and counties in Hebei province and 1 county party secretary falsely reported the cultivated land in exchange for the construction land index, then resold the construction land index and embezzled more than 60 million yuan. Eight greed created the largest land nest case in Shijiazhuang, which harmed landless farmers. 20 1 1 At the beginning of the year, Song Yong, former deputy director of the Standing Committee of Liaoning Provincial People's Congress, was sentenced to death for accepting bribes in the first instance, with a two-year suspension. Song Yong seeks benefits for 23 units or individuals in undertaking projects and other matters, and has received money from developers and builders for many times, equivalent to RMB 654.38+002.2 million.
According to reports, in recent years, corruption cases in land, construction and other fields are common. According to the public reports of major domestic media, 30 corruption cases occurred in the fields of land and construction in 2009-20 10, involving an average amount of more than 8.7 million yuan. The per capita amount is 8.7 million! This may be one of the areas with the highest amount of money in all corruption cases.
In fact, this is only part of the public report of the media. If other media are included or not reported, people may even dare not imagine how much money is involved. Land is the biggest source of wealth. Many developers have embarked on the road of getting rich because of land, but at the same time, many officials have embarked on the road of "no return" because of land and developers.
At present, Hainan has entered the second year of international tourism island construction. Luo Baoming, governor of Hainan Province, stressed at a recent meeting that building an international tourist island requires an efficient and clean government. Public officials, government departments, especially power departments, must be efficient and clean, especially pay attention to scientific planning, cherish scarce resources such as harbors, sea areas, coastlines and land, develop and utilize them rationally and orderly, never pursue short-term behavior, and let the development potential and resources be passed down from generation to generation.
Governor Luo Baoming's words are shocking. Land is Hainan's superior wealth and the basic resource for Hainan's sustainable development, but it is also easy for public officials, government departments, especially power departments to "have an accident". After the value of Hainan is further reflected, it is bound to flood into countless developers who come to look for gold, thus taking land, important places and competing for land. Even under the temptation, they will spare no effort to open the way with "sugar-coated shells" and take turns to go into battle. How many officials can keep the "bottom line" Therefore, when the "land corruption case" in the East is vividly presented to people again, I hope that Governor Luo Baoming's words can be like a timely rain, dousing those officials who have illusions and want to use their power to make a fortune through land and developers. (This article Source: People's Daily Online)
More than a thousand acres of land in Dongfang City "knocked down" 25 officials
Source: Oriental Morning Post
2011February 15 08: 16 Let me say two sentences (0).
"Complications" in the Construction of Hainan as an International Tourism Island;
According to Xinhua News Agency, Haikou, February 14, the developer bypassed the land acquisition procedure and "privately occupied" the collective land at a low price, and then turned it into "state-owned" by bribing government officials and reselling it at a high price. Officials and businessmen formed an "interest transfer" alliance-a major land corruption case in Dongfang City, Hainan Province, which led to 25 officials, including the former mayor, the former deputy secretary of the municipal party committee and the heads of departments of land, construction and urban investment.
Recently, Tan Dengyao, the former mayor of Dongfang City, was sentenced to 18 years. Uncovering this land corruption case, Xinhua News Agency reporter found that with the construction of Hainan's "International Tourism Island", land prices rose and then rose, and land transactions became "high-corruption areas".
2.5 million yuan "thank you fee for examination and approval"
This "stealing the day" land corruption case was investigated and dealt with, benefiting from the real name report of the local people.
On June 5438+065438+ 10, 2009, Dongfang City Procuratorate received a report from the masses in Huang Ning Village, Bazhou Town, reflecting that village cadres colluded with Zhang Yanan, general manager of Dongfang Mulongwan Agricultural Tourism Development Company, and "expropriated" 1000 mu at a price of about 7,000 yuan per mu, and then resold it to the Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources at a price of more than 60,000 yuan per mu, from which huge land acquisition was obtained. )
After receiving the real-name report, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Hainan Province set up a task force, and the investigation results were surprising: in this land corruption case, 32 people were finally put on file for investigation, including 25 officials from Dongfang City, including not only the leaders of the former mayor, the former deputy secretary of the municipal party committee and the former deputy mayor, but also the heads of the municipal land, construction, urban investment and other departments to participate in the "fertilizer distribution", and 12 village cadres were involved.
How do developers and cadres "work together"? It turned out that Zhang Yanan bribed village cadres and obtained a piece of collective land from Huangning Village through illegal transfer. At the beginning of 2009, after learning that Dongfang Company planned to requisition about 1 10,000 mu of land as "reserve land", the developer Liu conspired with the government to "requisition at a high price" and charged the land price of 42,000 yuan per mu, and Liu owned the excess. Later, Liu recommended the land occupied by others to Tan Dengyao, then the mayor of Dongfang City, hoping that Tan Dengyao would "help" to list it as a "reserved land" of the government. A few months later, the municipal government really "expropriated" Huangning Village and Xiaoling Village 1.046 mu of collective land at a price of 68,000 yuan per mu.
According to the introduction of the then director of the Dongfang Municipal Transportation Bureau, Tan Dengyao said that the land recommended by Liu was listed as the "reserved land" of the government. Zhang Yanan also confirmed that the land acquisition was arranged by developer Liu looking for Tan Dengyao and Tan Dengyao. Li Xianmin, then vice mayor of Dongfang City and chairman of Chengtou Company, also confirmed that he had led a team to inspect the relevant plots, and then asked Wu Yufeng to make a land requisition report to the municipal government. After the job is done, the developer Liu will be paid "cooperation profit" of 22 million yuan. The latter took out 2.5 million yuan as the "approval fee" for Tan Dengyao.
According to China's Land Law, it is forbidden to transfer agricultural land and collective land. Judging from the structure of the officials involved, it was under the "instigation" of the mayor that the leaders of the functional departments responsible for land management, examination and approval, requisition and construction "understood" and used their positions to facilitate the "green light all the way" to help developers resell illegally occupied collective land to the government for "storage" at a high price through "legal examination and approval", and all relevant leading cadres demanded bribes of more than 654.38 million yuan.
Developers "control" officials
Wu Shoulin, the first-instance judge of Tan Dengyao's case, said that the key for developers to profit from illegally reselling collective land is to buy off the main leaders of the Oriental municipal government and relevant departments. So, how do developers establish an "interest alliance"?
Liu Yaming, director of the Investigation Division II of the Anti-Corruption Bureau of the Hainan Provincial Procuratorate, said that through investigation, it was found that the land management in Dongfang City was rather chaotic, and a lot of land, especially collective land, was controlled by private enterprise owners. In order to "legalize" the land they occupy, bosses try their best to "control" officials and finally "legally profit" from them.
To "control" officials, developers must first "make friends". According to Liu, in March and April of 2008, in order to urge the municipal government to complete the planning of Gaopoling scenic spot as soon as possible, he asked Tan Dengyao for help through his relationship. Later, with the recommendation of Tan Dengyao, this plan was quickly completed and reported to the province for approval ... The "friendship" between the two began. After that, Liu sent money and Tan Dengyao received it.
The Xinhua News Agency reporter learned that the officials of the land corruption case in Dongfang City formed an interlocking interest chain so tacitly, not only because of the "interest alliance", but also because of the poor local political style. In 2009, Li Xianmin, then vice mayor, sent 654.38 million yuan in cash to Tan Dengyao's office in the name of reporting work. Soon, Li Xianmin successfully served as the chairman of the city investment company. Tan Dengyao admitted that during his tenure as mayor, he accepted his subordinates 12 yuan, including the deputy mayor, the secretary-general of the Standing Committee of the Municipal People's Congress and the heads of transportation, finance, sanitation and other departments.
In Dongfang City, some officials must seek "return" after "running officials and selling officials", and the important source of "return" still depends on land. Land fetters the interests of corrupt officials.
National key projects should start from
The boss bought the land at a high price.
The survey found that at present, the problem of private enterprise bosses occupying land indiscriminately in Dongfang City is more prominent. Over the years, the municipal government has sold very little land through bidding, auction and hanging, and the income from land transfer fees is limited. Because many urban land is controlled by a few individual bosses, some local national and provincial key projects have to buy land from bosses at high prices.
The situation of Dongfang City is representative in Hainan. According to the relevant person in charge of Hainan Provincial Procuratorate, with the comprehensive promotion of Hainan's "International Tourism Island" construction, there are more and more investment and development projects, and the cases of corruption and bribery caused by land acquisition are on the rise year by year. In 20 10, the procuratorial organs of Hainan Province investigated and dealt with 43 cases of duty crimes involving 90 people in the field of rural land expropriation and development, which increased by 22.9% and 18.4% respectively. Cao Xiren, director of the Social Science Research Center of Hainan University, said that many land users expropriated land without approval, even ignored the national land management regulations, and directly determined the use, scope, compensation standards and agricultural population resettlement methods with rural grassroots organizations, which invisibly increased the possibility of corruption due to land problems. Cao Xiren suggested, "Absorb representatives of landless peasants to participate in land acquisition supervision, publish revenue and expenditure accounts, and let land sales run completely in the sun." Developers bypass the land acquisition process, privately occupy collective land at low prices, then buy off government officials and resell them to the government at high prices to become "state-owned", and officials and businessmen form an "interest transfer" alliance.
This major case of land corruption in Dongfang City, Hainan Province brought out 25 cadres, including the former mayor, the former deputy secretary of the municipal party committee and the heads of departments such as land, construction and urban investment. Recently, Tan Dengyao, the former mayor of Dongfang City, was sentenced to 18 years.
& gt& gt event
The masses reported that the land was "expropriated"
This "stealing the day" land corruption case was investigated and dealt with, benefiting from the real name report of the local people. On June 5438+065438+ 10, 2009, Dongfang City Procuratorate received a report from the masses in Huang Ning Village, Bazhou Town, reflecting that village cadres colluded with Zhang Yanan, general manager of Dongfang Mulongwan Agricultural Tourism Development Company, and "expropriated" 1000 mu at a price of about 7,000 yuan per mu, and then resold it to the Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources at a price of more than 60,000 yuan per mu, from which huge land acquisition was obtained.
The deputy secretary of the mayor participates in the money sharing.
After receiving the real-name report from the masses, the Hainan Anti-Corruption Bureau set up a task force, and the investigation results were surprising: in this land corruption case, 32 people were finally put on file for investigation, including 25 cadres from Dongfang City, including not only the leaders of the former mayor, the former deputy secretary of the municipal party committee and the former deputy mayor, but also the heads of the municipal land, construction, urban investment and other departments to participate in the "fertilizer distribution", and 12 village cadres were involved.
Uncovering this land corruption case, the reporter found that with the construction of Hainan's "international tourist island", land prices rose and then rose, and land transactions became "high-corruption areas".
& gt& gt status
The problem of private occupation of land is prominent.
The survey found that at present, the problem of private enterprise bosses occupying land indiscriminately in Dongfang City is more prominent. Over the years, the municipal government has sold very little land through bidding, auction and hanging, and the income from land transfer fees is limited. Because many urban land is controlled by a few private enterprise bosses, national and provincial key projects in some places have to buy land from bosses at high prices.
The situation of Dongfang City is representative in Hainan. According to the relevant person in charge of Hainan Provincial Procuratorate, with the comprehensive promotion of Hainan's "International Tourism Island" construction, there are more and more investment and development projects, and the cases of corruption and bribery caused by land acquisition are on the rise year by year. In 20 10, the procuratorial organs of Hainan Province investigated and dealt with 43 cases involving 90 people in the field of rural land expropriation and development, which increased by 22.9% and 18.4% respectively.
Cao Xiren, director of the Social Science Research Center of Hainan University, said that in some cases, the land acquisition procedure lacks transparency and the land acquisition method is simple and rude. Many land-using units expropriate land without approval, even ignore the national land management laws and regulations, and directly determine the use and scope of the expropriated land, the compensation standard for land acquisition and the resettlement method for agricultural population with rural grassroots organizations, which invisibly increases the possibility of corruption due to land problems.
Land expropriation supervision mode lags behind.
Cao Xiren suggested that it is urgent to strengthen the supervision of local governments' land supervision rights, strictly operate procedures, and clarify the ownership of land transaction subjects. "We should absorb representatives of landless peasants to participate in land acquisition supervision, publish revenue and expenditure accounts, and let land sales run completely in the sun."
Chen Dongbai, director of the Law Enforcement Office of the Hainan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, said that in the case that the means of land acquisition supervision are relatively lagging behind, the discipline inspection and supervision departments should strengthen supervision over cadres in the field of land development, especially depending on whether the examination and approval process complies with laws and regulations, effectively preventing officials from interfering in land issues and breeding corruption.
Judge & gt& gt's analysis of interest chain
Owners of private enterprises control land and pay bribes.
Wu Shoulin, the first-instance judge of Tan Dengyao's case, said that the key for developers to profit from illegal reselling of collective land is to buy off the main leaders of the Oriental municipal government and relevant departments through "tackling key problems".
Liu Yaming, director of the Investigation Division II of the Anti-Corruption Bureau of the Hainan Provincial Procuratorate, said that through investigation, it was found that land management in Dongfang City was rather chaotic, and many land, especially collective land, was controlled by private entrepreneurs. In order to legalize the land they occupied, they tried their best to "control" the officials, and finally the officials "profited legally".
Developers want to "control" officials, the first is "climbing friendship." According to developer Liu, in March and April of 2008, in order to urge the municipal government to complete the planning of Gaopoling scenic spot as soon as possible, he asked Tan Dengyao for help through his relationship. Later, with the recommendation of Tan Dengyao, this plan was quickly completed and reported to the province for approval ... The "friendship" between the two began. After that, Liu sent money and Tan Dengyao received it.
Cadres should "return" their posts when they run away from their posts.
The reporter learned that the officials of the land corruption case in Dongfang City formed an interlocking interest chain so tacitly, not only because of the "interest alliance", but also because of the poor local political style.
In 2009, Li Xianmin, then vice mayor, sent 654.38 million yuan in cash to Tan Dengyao's office in the name of reporting work. Soon after, Li Xianmin successfully served as the chairman of the city investment company. Tan Dengyao admitted that during his tenure as mayor, he accepted his subordinates 12 yuan, including the deputy mayor, the secretary-general of the Standing Committee of the Municipal People's Congress and the heads of transportation, finance, sanitation and other departments.
In Dongfang City, some cadres must seek "return" after "running officials and selling officials", and the important source of "return" still depends on land. Land fetters the interests of corrupt officials.
& gt& gt Secret cooperation between government and enterprises
Bribery of village cadres for illegal land acquisition
At first, Zhang Yanan bribed village cadres and obtained a piece of collective land from Huangning Village through illegal transfer.
At the beginning of 2009, after learning that Dongfang Company planned to requisition about 1 10,000 mu of land as "reserve land", the developer Liu conspired with the government to "requisition at a high price" and charged the land price of 42,000 yuan per mu, and Liu owned the excess.
Later, Liu recommended the land illegally occupied by others to Tan Dengyao, then the mayor of Dongfang City, hoping that Tan Dengyao would "help" to list it as a "reserved land" of the government. A few months later, the municipal government really "expropriated" Huangning Village and Xiaoling Village 1.046 mu of collective land at a price of 68,000 yuan per mu.
Bribery officials and reselling them at high prices
According to the introduction of the then director of the Dongfang Municipal Transportation Bureau, Tan Dengyao said that the land recommended by Liu was listed as the "reserved land" of the government. Zhang Yanan also confirmed that the land acquisition was arranged by developer Liu looking for Tan Dengyao and Tan Dengyao. Li Xianmin, then vice mayor of Dongfang City and chairman of Chengtou Company, also confirmed that he had led a team to inspect the relevant plots, and then asked Wu Yufeng to make a land requisition report to the municipal government. After the job is done, the developer Liu will be paid "cooperation profit" of 22 million yuan. The latter took out 2.5 million yuan as the "approval fee" for Tan Dengyao.
According to China's Land Law, it is forbidden to transfer agricultural land and collective land. Judging from the structure of the officials involved, it was under the "instigation" of the mayor that the leaders of the functional departments responsible for land management, examination and approval, requisition and construction "understood" and used their positions to facilitate the "green light all the way" to help developers resell illegally occupied collective land to the government for "storage" at a high price through "legal examination and approval", and all relevant leading cadres demanded bribes of more than 654.38 million yuan.
This edition is based on Xinhua News Agency.