Myth 1: Please register the contents in your resume.

Usually, the interviewer reads your resume first and then repeats it, which is absolutely impossible to arouse the interviewer's interest.

I have interviewed such candidates before. When he introduced himself, he replied directly: Do you have any questions?

What is document text? Do you have these interviewers, or are you not looking for anything?

Obviously, this will definitely leave a very bad impression at the beginning.

Myth 2: No focus, all useless information.

"Hello, I graduated from XXX University. I have made great achievements. My effect is very good. My hobby is 175. I have a wide range of hobbies. I like watching movies, playing basketball, playing games and traveling. "

If it's a new friends' party, it's not a big problem for you to introduce this, but the interview is irrelevant.

None of this is the interviewer you want, including your qualifications, because it has been restored. So, this is all useless information.

As for what the interviewer really wants? Let's talk about it later.

Myth 3: Lack of the concept of time.

Some people seem to be born to talk. These words are public and they can't accept them.

I met many such candidates, and I introduced myself for 2 minutes. I haven't been introduced for half a minute and five minutes I had to force it.

On the surface, it seems easy for them to get bogged down and delay time, but in fact, they are not prepared in advance, just playing and finally delaying time.

If the interview and even the first self-introduction are ready, in the interviewer's opinion, the applicant has at least two questions:

First of all, the position of the corresponding position looks so strong. So as an interviewer, why should I be with you?

Secondly, this concept is too bad. This is the potential harm of the follow-up work.

How to introduce yourself in an interview? Smart candidates, don't say useless information without a resume.

Simple self-introduction, what does the interviewer want to hear?

In Son, the interviewer wants to hear two core messages when introducing himself.

First of all, how interested are you in this position?

Do you have the ability to match your current position?

I know many people think that this may be opposed: who is so many that I can't ask without introducing myself?

That's right. In most cases, after introducing yourself, you will ask, if you can accurately grasp the pain in the first round, won't your first impression of the other person be better?

Especially for a large-scale business interview in an alley, in front of many competitors, the interviewer is based on everyone's energy. Of course, what you need to consider is how to stand out in the first interview and leave a deep impression and memory on the interviewer. How to introduce yourself in an interview? Smart candidates, don't say useless information without a resume.

Third, when introducing yourself, you can say this.

Having said all this, we must finally implement it. Candidates should speak better when interviewing themselves.

My son believes that an excellent self-introduction should be a clear-cut view.

There is only one core view: I am undoubtedly the best choice for your company.

Structure, suggested total division-total.

Let's make a demonstration. If your son is approved, you will introduce to the interviewer:

"Hello, I am a gang. Before delivery, I carefully studied the excessive positions of jd (job seekers). I feel very attractive. Combined with my past experience, I also believe that I can participate. "

This paragraph is about throwing points, being interested and confident.

"I noticed that the core requirements of this work are three points:

Solid XX technology.

I used to be the technical director of XX in the original company, and successfully delivered many similar projects with rich relevant experience.

Good pressure resistance.

I spent a lot of time on quality projects, and the internal and external pressure was very great. Especially once, customers always change their needs (some textual details). But I finally finished it. "

The above paragraph is a combination of the other party's job requirements, which shows that you can compete with the evaluation points and arguments.

"To sum up, I think I am very suitable for the position in your company. Thank you."

If we are graduates and have no relevant work experience, we can still maintain the same logic and only have corresponding replacement cases:

"I have a solid technical reserve. I got good grades in professional courses, all of which were+,and I also got a scholarship, and I also won the XX prize of the school for XX experiment.

I have good communication skills. I study the responsibility of XX at school and need to upload it to my teachers and classmates. The teacher has said many times that I communicate with my savings because I can always get to the point and it is very simple. I can give an example, such as (omitting many details).