What is the priority of enterprise employment? It embodies the concept of "people-oriented", and enterprise employment must first be talent-oriented. Of course, enterprises need employees with both ability and political integrity, but when one aspect is lacking, enterprises should be good at putting the right people in the right positions. At the same time, as an enterprise employee, also
You should have a clear understanding of yourself. When you are still lacking in a certain aspect, you should strive to strengthen your transformation and make yourself "have both ability and political integrity" to better meet the needs of enterprises. Through bilateral efforts, enterprises and individuals can achieve a win-win situation, so that everyone can find their own ideals, future and career through their contribution to enterprises, and truly realize the ultimate goal of "common development and prosperity of society, enterprises and employees".
As the saying goes, shopping malls are like battlefields, and it is very important to be virtuous and talented. But the topic of our debate is employing people in enterprises, so he has a premise that he already has a manager. As long as this manager has both ability and political integrity, he can create wealth and benefits for this enterprise as long as he has talent and ability in employing people. Of course, the manager of an enterprise must be an enterprising person. After creating benefits for the enterprise, if talented people do even a little harm to the enterprise, then managers will abandon them.
Objection: Enterprises should put morality first.
"Talent, prosperous career and prosperous country" shows that talent is a sharp weapon for enterprises to attack the city and survive and develop in the market competition, while morality is the adhesive for enterprises to create a good atmosphere. Although both are indispensable, they should be the priority factors for enterprises to select candidates, so "enterprises should give priority to talents"
If everyone knows history, then we will expand this scope. If the enterprise is a country, then the manager is an emperor. Now he needs the people to govern and stabilize the country for him. What kind of person does he need? I never deny the importance of virtue, but we should distinguish between the light and the heavy, and don't put the cart before the horse.
How do enterprises grow from small to large? Is it getting bigger for no reason? Isn't it because of the right people that enterprises grow up? Then, the development and expansion of enterprises is because talented people give full play to their talents and create wealth and benefits for enterprises.
On the other hand, morality is placed in an overwhelming position, thinking that without morality, the country and people will be in disaster and the world will be in chaos. However, our definition of morality is "incomplete negation". But flexible, flexible and full of humanity, talk about morality. There is no need to demand too much morality.
At the same time, we need to know what is the purpose of employing people in enterprises. Isn't the person they want to hire the very person who can help the enterprise bring vitality and benefits?
A person without talent will be eliminated soon. Talent is often experienced in work and life. His manners, his way of thinking, can explain whether this person has talent or not. Often the interview will see his talent first, and then see his character. Therefore, in the choice, it should be the first.
Example: A reporter once interviewed the general manager of a Taiwan-funded enterprise. The general manager said frankly and clearly: "The key for enterprises to use talents is to see whether the candidates are suitable for the job requirements of enterprises, that is, whether they have applicable value. This is the objective basis for recruiting talents, and application is talents; If it doesn't apply, even if you graduated from a famous university with a master's degree or a doctorate, you should give up your noble character. " Employers always hope that the talents they recruit can be competent for the job and create value for the enterprise. Therefore, the key to recruiting talents lies in whether their working ability and knowledge level meet the needs of work.
It can be seen that those who agree with putting morality first are very emotional people. But how fierce the market competition is now, it can't be solved by virtue. Again, when writing a resume, you can't explain what good things you have done in the middle of your resume, but only pay attention to your talents and skills and your major, because the company recruits talents instead of philanthropists.
To take a step back, our view is that talent first is not necessarily immoral, but only the word "first". I don't think it necessary to explain the meaning of first.
Enterprises should pay attention to efficiency! The standard of enterprise employment is talent first, virtue first, that is to say, we have not denied the existence of virtue, but virtue is only used as an auxiliary standard in enterprise employment!
I would like to ask another debater: when interviewing new people, do ordinary enterprises choose talents first in the initial test? It must be! In other words, people who are incompetent or less talented than others can't pass the first level at all. Of course, the so-called first level is the first level. You must pass the first level, that is, the test of talent, and the company will examine your virtue again, so talent comes first and character comes first!
Of course, it is undeniable that some managers in enterprises must be convinced by virtue, but virtue here is actually another talent based on professional talent, isn't it? Therefore, talent comes first!
Example: Historically, handsome and promising monarchs were always talented, and only the more conservative emperors were talented. However, it must also be the king of the next generation. You have a founding king, and the world will be in chaos. Without talents, we can rule the world together, and relying on a few homesickness can't open the overall situation. What about the enterprise? Liu Che was in Yuanfeng for five years. Because there are not enough civil and military officials, he asks for talents. Zhao said, "Beggars have extraordinary merits and will treat extraordinary people. Therefore, a horse may run thousands of miles, and a scholar may be tired of negative customs and become famous. A horse driven by her husband,
A relaxed man is also on the side of the royal family. "A swift horse is not easy to tame. Talented people are often referred to and picked by ordinary people, but Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty didn't use this horse because he was confident that he had the ability to control it and could shorten it with his strengths. Why can't managers of enterprises foster strengths and avoid weaknesses? Wei Wudi and Cao Cao are more prominent. He has given three orders to hire talents regardless of morality. He even said that "people who are insulted, laugh at others, or are heartless, but have the skills of governing the country" should be recommended by local officials so that they can "get the right way." It can be seen that a country needs "talents" rather than "morality" when everything is thriving. Shangshu said: "The only way to control chaos is to be an ordinary official. Officials are not as good as private, but they can; Wang Jue doesn't care about evil, but he is virtuous. "In other words, officials should be appointed according to their ability, and they should be rated according to their moral character.
It is very important for enterprises to hire talents first because it is very important. A person needs a skill to make a living, an enterprise needs a "business backbone" to develop, and a country needs a scientific and technological elite to stay ahead. Sometimes it is the foundation of your career success. Real talent and practical learning can make you travel around the world almost unimpeded. In ancient times, there was a meritocracy, but now there is a merit-based admission, precisely because of talents.
The argument against the other side extends the famous saying of the ancients, "Talent is the weapon for enterprises to attack the city and survive and develop in the market competition, while virtue is the adhesive for enterprises to create a good atmosphere. Although both are indispensable, they should be the priority factors for enterprises to select candidates, so "enterprises should give priority to talents"
The other person's explanation of being a man is this: "-virtue is morality and cultivation." Including: integrity, sincerity, responsibility, and more importantly, the management should be self-motivated and enterprising; At the same time, it also advocates the cultivation of employees' personal accomplishment: including communication etiquette, personality, courage, perseverance, perseverance, confidence and patience. "
Isn't honest and sincere sense of responsibility, perseverance, confidence and patience an ability to adapt to society? These so-called virtues are actually a talent for interpersonal communication.
When enterprises recruit people, they must ask candidates to adapt to this position. Not that this man is respected. If an enterprise needs to recruit a highly respected person, then the enterprise has regarded "highly respected" as the person it needs.
On the other hand, getting on the horse to kill Zhang Fei is better than Liu Bei, and Zhuge Liang is better than Liu Bei in making suggestions. If you want to find someone to kill the enemy, find Zhang Fei. If you want to find someone who is wise, find Zhuge Liang.
I wonder if the other debater has written a resume. If not, you can open the search website to see how the resume is written. What do companies look at when they look at the resume? Is it because you have a high self-evaluation morality? Morality cannot be seen in a short time. It is impossible for an enterprise to keep you in the enterprise for long-term observation just to see if you have morality. 1 He looks at your work ability, work experience and talent to see if it is helpful to the enterprise, but these can be seen through skill certificate, post certificate or on-site assessment. Add, "I hope God will be full of vitality again and use talents in an eclectic way."
Please treat the coexistence of talents and virtues dialectically, and distinguish the primary and secondary needs of enterprises for talents and virtues. What I said "not harming the interests of enterprises" is indeed a moral requirement. We don't deny that morality is important to enterprises, but compared with enterprises, it still needs talents to promote development, so it is far more important than Germany.
Talent comes first, and shopping malls are like battlefields. If you are not even as good as your opponent in professional skills, how can you beat your opponent? Based on your noble character? Please answer the opponent's argument that "talent is not enough to make up, but virtue is not enough to make up". I don't know if you have heard of the example of "turning over evil, turning back to the prodigal son, becoming a Buddha on the spot, and so on!" And what we are disparaging now is the employment of enterprises, not life! Life can compete with the world, but enterprises will be replaced if they do not compete. So please don't digress.
A person with both ability and political integrity refers to a person with noble sentiments and extraordinary talents at the same time, while at the other extreme, he is a "bitch" without virtue and talent (please forgive me for using such a word, because I am too ignorant to find a better word to describe such a person).
The above two types of people are very few, and the sentiments and talents of the vast majority of ordinary people can only be described as "ordinary". Between those who have both ability and political integrity and ordinary people, there are some minority groups with high morality, average learning or extraordinary ability-there are also a few special individuals with virtue but no talent or talent without virtue; Between ordinary people and "bitches", there are some immoral people with general talent or uneducated people with general morality.
I want you to point out clearly what kind of people do you think the "people" of "enterprise employment" are aimed at?
Without a specific target, our debate will be meaningless.
Just as your "this man is crazy" debater only focuses on people without talent and talent, it is impossible for enterprises to hire them, which will only lead this debate astray. )))
Cai Benqin Hui is a traitor, but how do you know him? If you are not famous, how can you talk about traitors if you are not a minister? How can he be a minister? It was the emperor who took a fancy to his talent that he reused it. Isn't that talent first?
A comparison between Liu Bang and Xiang Yu, well-known historical figures. Many people will say, "winners and losers." The account in Historical Records shows Liu Bang's virtue under Xiang Yu. Zhuangzi also said: "Whoever steals the hook will be punished, whoever steals the country will be a vassal, and the door of the vassal will be benevolent." But because of Sima Qian, Liu Bang's rogue nature will never be washed away.
Let's compare their talents and virtues. It seems that Xiang Yu's virtue is better, but his talent is not as good as Liu Bang's. Liu bang is good at winning over people. Don't think this is a virtue. It's just that he gave full play to his talents and actively adopted the strategies and suggestions of counselors such as Sean. The overlord of Chu is not as good as Liu Bang. This shows that we can make up for the shortcomings of virtue and behave like "virtue" in front of the world. From the historical comparison, we can draw a conclusion that it is not bad to use people to supplement morality, and whoever comes first should be a talent!
The Three Kingdoms is the seventh of three seemingly competitive enterprises. The other party likes to talk about the Three Kingdoms, so let's talk about the Three Kingdoms. We compare the Three Kingdoms to three enterprises, one of which is headed by Liu Bei. So who are his men Guan Gong, Zhang Fei and Zhuge Liang? The other party described his talent like this. Guan Gong, a million-strong master in Mawei Town, dismounted and studied the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. He is a rare talent, but he is a superficial virtue. Zhang Fei can be belligerent, brave and invincible, but his temper is a bit shallow. Zhuge Liang, who knows astronomy above and geography below, is self-aware (the other party said, "Zhuge Liang is too smart, and he has long seen that he has no virtue of bravery." As for Zhuge Liang's shallow morality, it can be seen from his determination to help others become his overlord.
Then I want to ask other debaters, do you admit that all three of them are better than Peter? It's best not to shoot yourself in the foot, because the meat is your own.
Ask the other person to give a measure of virtue? What do you mean by "first"? When employing people, first look at whether you have this talent, and then look at virtue after selecting a batch. Otherwise, what should I do? This is a question of order. Who says talent means no virtue? Just up and down.
Data 2
First of all, I want to ask you what is most lacking in 2 1 century. Genius. Well, thank you for standing from our perspective. What I want to tell you is that it is precisely because of the lack of talents that enterprises first consider talents when employing people. Below, I will give you some thoughts on some of the focuses of our debate in this debate, and at the same time point out some misunderstandings of the other debater.
(First, another debater has been making a big fuss about convincing people with virtue in enterprises. In fact, it is unrealistic for enterprises to serve people with virtue. Judging from the formulation of employment standards, it is unparalleled and easy to operate. Comparing the two, we can easily find that this method of employing people first is more feasible.
Second, the other party's remarks have been entangled in two extreme situations: talent without virtue and virtue without talent. And repeatedly pay attention to people who are not used by these two enterprises. If this continues, it will only lead this debate to a point of no return. In fact, we have reminded our opponents many times, but they have turned a deaf ear again and again, and it is still redeemable to turn a deaf ear. If you are stubborn, you are really hopeless.
Third, the opposing debater tried to draw a general conclusion according to some special cases, so as to summarize the whole. Isn't it ridiculous and absurd for the other party to make such logical reasoning?
Fourth, we have always reiterated that we have not completely rejected morality, but we can talk about morality flexibly, flexibly and humanely, which is what enterprises need when employing people. What we emphasize is that enterprises should put talents first, supplemented by virtue, and virtue is to help talents play better. But the opposing debater has distorted our views time and time again. Why hasn't the other debater come to his senses?
Fifth, as the saying goes, shopping malls are like battlefields. If we are even inferior to each other in professional skills, how can we beat our competitors? Only by virtue? Here, we don't deny that some managers in the enterprise must be able to convince people with virtue, but the virtue mentioned here is actually the ability to deal with people on the basis of professional talents. Therefore, the requirements of enterprises for talents when employing people are actually indirect requirements for morality, which shows that talents are the first reason for enterprises to employ people!
Secondly, we can see that people who agree with putting morality first are very emotional people. But how fierce the market competition is now, it can't be solved by virtue. Today, our position is that enterprises should put talents first and morality second. A person's talent can often be realized in work and life. His words and deeds, his way of thinking, can explain whether this person has talent or not. And a person's moral level, at the moment when the coffin is built, is used to draw conclusions. Enterprises are in urgent need of employment. Why not consider talents first? You can't leave a talent who can bring the enterprise back to life immediately, without a person who can't meet the requirements and doesn't know whether his morality is as high as he says. Therefore, enterprises should put talents first when employing people! To sum up, it is an understandable fact that enterprises put talents first, whether from the perspective of operability, feasibility or pure reality!
Finally, I want to tell you that we are like relying on heaven to kill dragons, while the other side only does things with words, guns and swords after virtue. Who can be more proud of the rivers and lakes? Everyone has his own justice. Where the truth is, it is clear at a glance.