Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Resume - How does the Ministry of Land and Resources punish the illegal construction of villas and golf courses?
How does the Ministry of Land and Resources punish the illegal construction of villas and golf courses?
In March 2006, Qinglongtou Village Committee of Qinglong Lake Town in Fangshan District illegally occupied 326. 12 mu of collective land (including cultivated land 127.39 mu) in the name of implementing new rural construction, and built new houses, villas, roads and other facilities for farmers.

A total of 144 buildings were built, including villa 138 buildings.

In April 2007, the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources, together with the urban planning department, demolished 85 villas that violated the overall land use planning, and confiscated the remaining villas and buildings. Wang Zhonghai, deputy head of Fangshan District in charge of agriculture, was given an administrative warning by the municipal discipline inspection and supervision department; Yang Dongsheng, director of Fangshan District Labor and Social Security Bureau and former party secretary of Qinglong Lake Town, was given an administrative demerit; Wu Baoxiang, former party secretary and mayor of Qinglong Lake Town, was given a serious warning; and Liu Songhua, executive deputy mayor of Qinglong Lake Town, was given an administrative dismissal.

Tianjin investigated and dealt with the case of illegal renting of cultivated land by Xinyuanzhuang Village Committee in Dongli District.

From June, 5438 to February, 2004, Xinyuanzhuang Village Committee of Dongli District leased 382.87 mu of collective land to Tianjin Liqun Company for production and operation activities at the price of 2,000 yuan per mu per year. The lease term is 30 years, and the rent for two years is1696,500 yuan. Liqun Company has built more than one office building 1 building and warehouse 10 on the leased land, covering an area of 5. 1 mu, and the rest of the ground has been hardened with ash and cement for stacking steel pipes. Among the occupied land, there are 372 mu of basic farmland, 6.6 mu of general cultivated land and 4.27 mu of residential and industrial land.

In April 2007, Tianjin Municipal Bureau of Land Resources and Housing made a penalty decision and ordered Liqun Company to return the illegally occupied land, demolish the buildings on the ground and restore the original appearance of the land. For the illegal land lease behavior of Xinyuanzhuang Village Committee, it was decided to confiscate the illegal income of/kloc-0 1.6965 million yuan and impose a fine of 84,825 yuan, which has been applied to the people's court for compulsory execution. At the same time, the case was transferred to the public security organ to investigate the criminal responsibility of Chai Shoushan, the legal representative of Liqun Company.

Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region investigated and dealt with the illegal land occupation case of Baotou Deshun Special Steel Co., Ltd.

On March 28th, 2007, Baotou Deshun Special Steel Co., Ltd. illegally signed a land acquisition agreement with Baiyintao Village Committee of Xiashihao Township, Guyang County, and expropriated 1.526 mu of land in Baiyintao Village. The company paid compensation of 274,680 yuan to the village committee. Deshun Special Steel Co., Ltd. covers an area of 1338.5438+0 mu, with 28 buildings and structures such as prefabricated houses, covering an area of 150.5 mu.

On August 28, 2007, Baotou Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources imposed an administrative penalty: ordered Deshun Special Steel Co., Ltd. to return the unused land 1 188.3 1 mu, and demolished the illegally occupied new buildings and other facilities, and imposed a fine of 50 1669 yuan; The illegal act of unauthorized transfer of land by Baiyin Hetao Village Committee has been transferred to public security organs according to procedures, and the criminal responsibility of the relevant responsible persons has been investigated.

Shanghai investigated and dealt with the illegal land occupation case of Shanghai Dida Wood Industry Co., Ltd.

In June 2005, Shanghai Dida Wood Industry Co., Ltd. signed an agreement with the former Zhao Ting Village Committee of Jiading District to illegally lease the 42.5438+0 mu basic farmland construction1/factory building in Zhao Ting Village. Occupation of land violates the overall land use planning.

June 5438+October 2007 10, Shanghai Housing and Land Resources Administration made an administrative penalty decision according to law, and demolished illegal buildings and facilities within a time limit, with a fine of 560,000 yuan. Jiading Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau filed an investigation on the illegal land occupation case of Shanghai Dida Wood Industry Co., Ltd., and on July 29th, 2006, Gu Huoyu, the main person in charge of the company, and Chen Zhiming, the former party branch secretary of Zhao Ting Village were criminally detained. In June, 2007, the Party Working Committee of Jiading Industrial Zone gave Chen Zhiming, the former Party branch secretary of Zhao Ting Village, the punishment of revoking his post within the Party.

Anhui Province investigated and dealt with the case of illegally renting collective agricultural land in Sixian Economic Development Zone, Suzhou City.

In March, 2003, the Sicheng Town Government of Sixian County, Suzhou City, according to the instructions of the county party committee and the county government, signed land lease agreements with the relevant village committees respectively, illegally leased 2,803,338+0 mu of land for 30 years, and comprehensively developed it for the use of the Industrial Corporation of the Development Zone. The actual land occupied is 775 mu, including 557.28 mu of cultivated land.

The above-mentioned land has gone through the examination and approval procedures according to law. In August 2007, the Anhui Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Supervision Department made disciplinary decisions respectively, giving Zhang Xu, deputy director of Suzhou Municipal People's Congress and former secretary of Sixian County Committee, a serious warning; Give the former county magistrate Xu Guangbin a warning within the party; Give an administrative warning to Ren Qingyun, former deputy county magistrate and director of the Development Zone, and Wang Feng, deputy director of the Development Zone; Give Zhang Jiangui, secretary of the Party Committee of Sicheng Town, a warning within the party; Yin Hui, the mayor of Sicheng Town, was given administrative demerit.

Henan province investigated and dealt with the case of Luoyang Huayi Group illegally occupying land to build a golf course.

In 200 1 and 10, Huayi Group leased 530 mu of collective land of the Sui and Tang Dynasties site in Luoyang to build a golf course in the name of building a plant ecological park. By the time of investigation, a small golf driving range covering an area of more than 30 mu and a 9-hole golf course covering an area of 405 mu have been built.

During the illegal occupation of land by China-Israel Group, the land and resources management departments of Luoyang City and Luolong District issued a notice to stop illegal activities. At present, the tee of the golf course has been dismantled and the related building facilities have been cleaned up. The Luoyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision respectively gave Xu Jinhong, the deputy head of Luolong District with leadership responsibility, a warning within the party, Fu Jianxiu, the former director of Luoyang Construction Bureau with leadership responsibility, and Yang, the deputy director of Luoyang Construction Bureau and the chief of building materials department with direct responsibility, an administrative dismissal. Luoyang municipal government has made a written inspection to the provincial government on this issue.

Shaanxi Province investigated and dealt with the illegal land occupation case of Xianyang Huaxi Paper Co., Ltd.

In March and May of 2006, Xianyang Huaxi Paper Co., Ltd. signed a land lease agreement with Nanguan Village Committee of Fengdong Town, Qindu District twice, illegally renting 77.02 mu of land in the village, and actually occupying/kloc-0.04 mu of cultivated land to build a paper mill. Fengdong Town Enterprise Office stamped the land lease agreement as a supervision certificate.

In August 2007, Shaanxi Provincial Department of Land and Resources made an administrative penalty decision: it ordered the return of illegally occupied land, demolished new buildings and other facilities, and imposed a fine of 693,000 yuan. Qindu District Supervision Bureau gave administrative warning to Li, former party secretary of Fengdong Town, Jing Xuefeng, mayor, and Bai Shilin, deputy mayor, who were responsible for the case and had poor supervision.

Gansu Province investigated and dealt with the illegal land use case of Dongyan Project in Jingning County.

In June 5438 +2002 10, the government of Jingning County, Gansu Province held a county magistrate's office meeting and formed a summary, and decided to lease farmers' collective land for the eastward expansion project of the county. The county government has successively signed agreements with Dongguan Village in Chengguan Town and Gaochengzhai Village in Balizhuang Township, illegally leasing farmers' collective land 1 0/7.063 mu, successively building five main roads in the county town, providing land construction units with 47 commercial and residential buildings and 37 villas, occupying a total of 9 18.64 mu.

In August 2007, Gansu Provincial Department of Land and Resources ordered Jingning County Government to cancel the land lease agreement signed with the village committee. Gansu Provincial Supervision Department gave Jingning county magistrate a serious warning in the party, Xu Fuzhong, former county party committee member and executive deputy magistrate, and Li, former county party committee member and executive deputy magistrate, with greater administrative demerit, Jing, deputy county magistrate, and administrative demotion.

Two is to investigate and deal with violations of the overall land use planning of illegal land occupation, a total of five, namely:

Liaoning Province investigated and dealt with the case of illegal land occupation in Tujiatun Village, dengta city

In May, 2003, Tujiatun Village Committee of Yantai Sub-district Office in dengta city illegally occupied 76.8 mu of collective cultivated land, built 105 peasant houses, illegally transferred 1 office building, and illegally transferred10.5 mu of land. The occupation of land does not conform to the overall land use planning.

In September 2007, Liaoyang Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources made an administrative penalty decision according to law: take back the land illegally occupied by Tujia Village and impose a fine of 936,438+0.2 million yuan; The illegally transferred land was confiscated and fined 600,000 yuan. The Commission for Discipline Inspection of dengta city made a decision and gave Cao Zhenwan, secretary of the Party branch of Tujia village, a serious warning in the party.

Shandong Province investigated and dealt with the case of illegal land grant in Linyi Economic and Technological Development Zone.

From September 2004 to June 2005, Linyi Economic and Technological Development Zone illegally used 1428 mu due to illegal land grant and poor supervision.

On June 5438+February 1 day, 2006, Linyi Municipal Supervision Bureau made a disciplinary decision: Wang Yuhua, the former director of the Management Committee of Linyi Economic and Technological Development Zone, was given a heavier punishment; Give serious warning to Zhu, secretary of the Party Working Committee and director of the Management Committee of the Development Zone; Zou, deputy director of the management Committee, was punished by the administrative record.

Hubei Province investigated and dealt with the illegal land occupation case of Wuhan Yu Xiang Foundry Co., Ltd.

In June 2004, Wuhan Yu Xiang Foundry Co., Ltd. occupied cultivated land to build a foundry in Fiona Fang Village, Cangbu Street, Xinzhou District, Wuhan without legal approval. The Land and Resources Bureau of Xinzhou District, Wuhan issued the Notice of Ordering to Stop Illegal Land Acts on August 10, 2004, and went to the site several times to stop it. However, the company continued its construction and was completed and put into operation in May, 2005. The actual occupation of general cultivated land 13.4 mu did not conform to the overall land use planning.

Wuhan Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources decided to order the return of illegally occupied land; Demolition of new buildings and other facilities on illegally occupied land within a time limit, and restoration of the land to its original state; Impose a fine of 25 yuan /m2. Wuhan Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision respectively gave Fang Haiquan, secretary of the Party branch and director of the village committee of Fiona Fang Village in Cangbu Street, a severe warning in the Party, Pan, director of Cangbu Street Land and Resources Institute, who was directly responsible, a demerit, Song Hailin, former director of Cangbu Street Office, an administrative warning, Cai Ailong, director of Xinzhou District Land and Resources Bureau, who was mainly responsible, and admonishing and talking to the deputy head of Xinzhou District. Instruct Xinzhou District Government to write a profound written inspection to Hubei Provincial Government.

Hunan Province investigated and dealt with the case of illegal land grant by Lanshan County People's Government.

In July, 2005, Lanshan County Government introduced Li Huang (Hong Kong) Bleaching and Dyeing Factory Co., Ltd. to set up a wholly-owned wool yarn bleaching and dyeing enterprise in Lanshan. In August, the county government held a special meeting to study the land acquisition and demolition work. In September, the construction headquarters of Lanshan New Industrial Park began to level the land, with a total area of 4 1.3 1 mu, including 24.06 mu of cultivated land.

In April 2007, the Hunan Provincial Department of Land and Resources made an administrative penalty decision according to law, ordered the Lanshan County Government to return the illegally occupied land and imposed a fine of 435,000 yuan. Chen is the deputy magistrate of the Blue Mountain County Government, and bears the leadership responsibility. The Hunan Provincial Department of Land and Resources transferred the case to the Provincial Supervision Department on June 26, and investigated its party discipline and political responsibility according to law. Lanshan County Government has made a written review to Hunan Provincial Department of Land and Resources.

Guangdong Province investigated and dealt with the case of defrauding the approved land for yingde city Hot Water Lake Hot Spring Project.

In 2004, yingde city Municipal Government introduced Huxian Development Co., Ltd. to invest in the construction of Hot Water Lake Hot Spring Resort. On June 5438+ 10, 2004, yingde city municipal government took the opportunity of land market regulation to complete the procedures of land left over from history, and colluded with the town government and yingde city Land Bureau to fabricate 2 1 false materials and give a lift to apply for land for the project. Qingyuan Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources did not seriously examine and approve the land use formalities for 1226.337 mu. By the time of investigation, the illegal land occupation had reached 10 12.79 mu (including 487.02 mu of cultivated land).

In August 2007, Guangdong Provincial Department of Land and Resources imposed an administrative penalty of RMB 6,756,438+967,000 on Yingde Huxian Development Co., Ltd. for illegally occupying land. The Supervision Bureau of Qingyuan City and yingde city City respectively made decisions: instructed Pan, vice chairman of Qingyuan City and director of the Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources, to make an in-depth inspection, gave the former executive deputy mayor of yingde city a serious administrative record and a serious warning within the party, and gave Liang Weizhong, director of Qingyuan Land Reserve Center, and Zhuang, director of yingde city Bureau of Land and Resources, a serious administrative record and a serious warning within the party. Li Mukun, the former mayor of Hengshitang Town, is now the secretary of the town Committee and has been severely warned by the party; Give Huang Zhixing, the former mayor of Hengshitang Town, a big administrative record and a serious warning within the party; Pan Qizan, director of the Land Institute of Hengshitang Town, has been removed from office by the administration and severely warned by the party.

The third is to investigate and deal with "unauthorized use" of illegal land occupation, a total of three, namely:

Hebei Province investigated and dealt with the case of Suning County Land and Resources Bureau illegally occupying land to build villas.

On June 5438+ 10, 2004, the Land and Resources Bureau of Suning County illegally built leading group villas and staff residential buildings without going through the land acquisition procedures, and used its authority to apply for state-owned land use certificates. Related projects were completed and put into use in the second half of 2006.

In August 2007, the Supervision Bureau of Cangzhou Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources made a decision: Liu Quanliang, deputy head of Suning County, was given a serious warning within the party; Shi Shenglong, director of the County Land and Resources Bureau, was dismissed from his post within the party; Li Mengdong, deputy director of the County Land and Resources Bureau, was given a serious warning in the party; Wang Xijiu, director of the County Construction Bureau, was given an administrative warning; Yan Bin, chief engineer of County Construction Bureau, was given administrative warning. The Suning county government was instructed to deal with the illegal land use of villas and staff residential buildings and the problem of over-area of villas and houses according to law and discipline.

Jiangsu Province investigated and dealt with the illegal land occupation case of Changzhou Xinzha Sub-district Office.

In June 2005, Xinzha Sub-district Office in Zhonglou District of Changzhou illegally occupied 169.265 mu of collective land in Qianjin Village (including cultivated land 144.473 mu) to build a standard factory building without approval.

In April 2007, Jiangsu Provincial Department of Land and Resources issued a decision on administrative punishment, and imposed a fine of 6,543.8+0,654.38+0.28 million yuan on the illegal occupation of land by Xinzha Sub-district Office. The above-mentioned land has gone through the examination and approval procedures according to law. According to the suggestion of the Provincial Department of Land and Resources, the Changzhou Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection gave Wang Renhua (deputy division level), secretary of the Party Working Committee of Xinzha Street and director of the People's Congress Working Committee, the main person responsible for illegal land use, a warning within the party.

Zhejiang Province investigated and dealt with cases of illegal land use in pinghu city Jiulongshan Resort.

From 2004 to 2006, the leading group for the development and construction of pinghu city Jiulongshan Tourism Resort illegally expropriated 1 122.57 mu of collective land, and Jiulongshan Development Co., Ltd. illegally occupied 1 127.78 mu (including 884.077 mu of basic farmland) to build a golf course.

The Zhejiang Provincial Department of Land and Resources filed an investigation and made a decision on administrative punishment: the illegal requisition of collective land 1 122.57 mu by the leading group for the development and construction of pinghu city Jiulongshan Tourism Resort without legal approval was invalid, and it ordered Jiulongshan Development Co., Ltd. to return the land, dismantle new buildings and other facilities within a time limit, restore the land to its original state, impose a fine, and transfer the responsible personnel to judicial organs. Jiaxing Supervision Bureau gave pinghu city Municipal Government the deputy mayor in charge of the management committee of Jiulongshan Tourism Resort, the executive deputy head of the leading group for the development and construction of the resort and Jiulongshan Industrial City, and Pan Chuandi, director of the office, a disciplinary sanction. The pinghu city Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision respectively gave Zhao Baoyuan, director of the Jiulongshan Tourism Resort Management Committee and deputy head of the leading group for the development and construction of the resort, administrative demotion; Tang Kaijian, deputy commander of the development and construction headquarters of Jiulongshan Tourism Resort and head of the land acquisition policy processing group of the resort, was given an administrative demerit; Sheng Baofa (now retired), former director of the Bureau of Land and Resources of Pinghu City, was given a warning within the party.

The above-mentioned 16 cases involved 8 193.2 mu of illegal land, including 32410.8 mu of cultivated land.

Zhang Xinbao introduced that the local authorities punished the above-mentioned illegal land use according to laws and regulations, and held the relevant personnel accountable. Three county-level people's governments were instructed to make in-depth inspections, and 43 cadres were given disciplinary sanctions, including 3 cadres at the prefecture (city) level and1person at the county (department) level; Four cases of suspected crimes have been transferred to public security departments and judicial organs according to legal procedures, and the criminal responsibility of criminal suspects has been investigated according to law.

Zhang Xinbao pointed out that the serious investigation and punishment of these illegal cases in accordance with the law shows the determination and confidence of governments and land and resources departments at all levels to implement the spirit of a series of important instructions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on land management, strictly manage land and stick to the red line of 65.438+08 billion mu of cultivated land. Judging from the current situation, some cases of illegal land use still occur from time to time, such as violating the overall land use planning, "collecting land by rent", using it first without approval, and seriously damaging the legitimate rights and interests of the people.

To this end, the Ministry of Land and Resources has deployed a 100-day campaign for land law enforcement throughout the country, and will further increase the publicity of land law enforcement, and publish land law enforcement and typical illegal cases from time to time. The Ministry of Land and Resources requires land and resources management departments at all levels to strictly enforce the law, openly investigate and investigate typical cases of major land violations, and publicly expose them, further punish land violations, ensure the effective implementation of the central land control policies, and ensure sound and rapid economic development.

Neither tolerant nor soft

-Comments 16 Cases of illegal land use were exposed.

Shortly after the launch of the large-scale national 100-day land law enforcement campaign, the Ministry of Land and Resources announced to the public 16 land violation cases closed by local land and resources departments. Its speed and strength are unprecedented. This fully demonstrates the strong determination of the Ministry of Land and Resources to implement the requirements of the central leadership and resolutely curb the momentum of illegal land acquisition; It also reflects the positive attitude of local land and resources departments at all levels to actively respond, act quickly and carry out in-depth investigation and punishment.

16 cases of illegal land use announced this time are classified according to the types of illegal acts, some of which are levied by rent, some of which violate the overall land use planning, and some of which are built without approval. 16 cases are only nine hairs of Niu Yi's head compared with thousands of illegal land cases every year. However, these cases represent the main trends and signs of current land violations, and they are the key land violations investigated and dealt with in the 100-day operation, which are quite typical and representative.

Another important feature of the 16 case published this time is that the responsible person has been seriously dealt with. Among them, 43 cadres were punished by party discipline and political discipline, including many cadres at the prefecture and city levels, and 0/0 cadres of Land and Resources System/KLOC-0 were punished by party discipline and political discipline. The responsible persons of 4 cases were suspected of committing crimes and were transferred to the public security and judicial departments according to legal procedures. It can be said that in the past, people's impression of "breaking the law but not breaking the law" and the situation of dealing with "much thunder and little rain" have begun to change.

At present, the situation of illegal land use in China is grim. If drastic measures are not taken, the goal of sticking to 65.438+0.8 billion mu of cultivated land will be lost, and the implementation effect of land control policies will be greatly reduced; If land violations are allowed to spread, the vital interests of farmers will be lost, the risk of social harmony and stability will increase, and the dignity and authority of national laws will also be questioned. Because of this, the Ministry of Land and Resources decided to publicly report this 16 illegal case at the beginning of the 100-day operation.

Undoubtedly, the publication of this 16 case is of special significance and will certainly play an important role in promoting the 100-day action. Fully promoting the 100-day action is the central task of the land and resources department at present. All localities should carefully organize, comprehensively clean up, strictly investigate and correct, and handle cases in strict accordance with the law. Although the case of 16 published this time is only the tip of the iceberg, it has an important warning function. It once again warned local governments and land and resources departments at all levels to overcome their fear of difficulties, clarify their vague understanding and earnestly take responsibility. At the same time, I also remind everyone not to take chances, not to be afraid of offending people, to investigate the case clearly, investigate the law, and investigate in place. No tolerance, no pity.