The scenery is another scene.
No matter how important it is.
A right person, an unforgettable memory.
So much for the luxury of life. No matter where you go and what you do, there is someone who can accompany you through thick and thin, always care about you and care for you, and you will take it for granted and have a great chance of success. But if you choose the wrong person, it is equivalent to the traveler adding a handful of sand to his shoes. He won't go far.
Chu and Han contended, and Liu Bang was inferior to Xiang Yu in both martial arts and art of war, but why did he finally succeed? Isn't it because of the help of Sean and Han Xin?
I think friends are very important ~ one tree cannot make a forest ~ one person remembers short, two people remember long, and three heads are better than one! You are not perfect ~ you don't think comprehensively ~ if you just graduated from college ~ you have no experience and qualifications! Even if you want to start your own business! One person can never do it! But it is more important to see what kind of people you are with!
Personal opinion! I hope it works!
Where to go indicates the ultimate goal of life, and who to walk with indicates the expected partner on the road to success.
The goal is cold and the partner is warm. An ideal partner can even correct the direction of the goal.
Just a few decades of cold and hot, if you want to spend happily, you must choose a good partner. Unless you can stick to your beliefs and focus on your life. Then you are also great!
If you do whatever it takes to achieve your goal, it will do too much harm to the outside world. Want to get married, if you just want to get married, find someone who has no common language and quarrel every day, will you? )
-Counterexamples: Stalin's purge, someone's "flower theory", and the XX of the Korean people.
Steve ballmer, the current CEO of Microsoft, was asked, "What is the luckiest thing in your life?" At that time, he said without hesitation: "I became friends with a generation of Tianjiao Gates." The love of mathematics, science and Napoleon made the two math lunatics hit it off at Harvard. They have different personalities, but they have an amazing tacit understanding. In the words of Gates, the two are "high-frequency communication" and can accept all the information of the other party. Later, Gates couldn't sit still at school and went through the formalities of dropping out of school to engage in Microsoft. At this time, he encouraged Ballmer to quit school for the first time to help him. Ballmer chose to continue to be the "head" of the Harvard football team and rejected him. After obtaining a double degree in mathematics and economics, Ballmer first chose to work for Procter & Gamble, and then Gates persuaded him to drop out of Stanford University and join Microsoft for the second time. This time Ballmer agreed. Later, they started the era of Microsoft and information revolution side by side. When we stand at the starting point of our career and start thinking about the development of life, we will inevitably face the same problems as them. Which is more important, where to go and who to go with?
Where to go. One of the most important meanings of life lies in the value orientation.
The destination is more important, because people always come and go alone and can only rely on themselves!
You and your girlfriend have been in love for four years. If assigned separately, you can go to the State Council. If you are with her, you should be a volunteer. What would you do?
If where to go refers to the purpose, well, I think this purpose is more important ~ Only by setting important goals in life can we achieve great goals and devote our lives to our country ~ If we just live in the world, we don't even have goals or are short-sighted, wouldn't we live in vain?
I think where to go is important, it is a matter of people's will and understanding, and who to go with is attached. There are too many people walking with you. In your life, the world is so small.
Of course, the question of where to go is very important. Wouldn't it be better to work with the people you love?
How many people can clap their chests and say, "I can let go."
When Edison invented the light bulb, people around him didn't understand it, and even authoritative scholars thought the light bulb was unrealistic. How many power plants does a city need to make every household use electric lights?
Did Hitler start World War II because of his ambition or because of who he was associated with?
Rape and murder, arson, robbery, stealing a boat, if you are a traitor, no matter what your character is, but what you do is not good, will you? A person is handsome and attractive, but if you are a mistress, you can have fun without getting married. Would you like to stay with him for a lifetime? (You can say "So you think so" if the other person wants to)
-Examples: Hitler's World War II and the Gang of Four. ...
Hitler's birth is a legend, and his character was very good and attractive from the beginning.
Life is sometimes like two rivers, which meet and separate. The purpose of the encounter is to flow to the target faster, and the target will not change at all because of the encounter.
(2)
Who you live with can include where you go, and its scope is wider than where you go.
We can imagine going there as going for a walk with a desire to go there.
There can be many kinds of peers,
So who you go with is included in where you go.
So who to go with is more important than where to go.
I want to ask you a question: when you decide to go to a place, why on earth do you want to go?
For example, tourism: When you choose to visit places of interest and cultural heritage, you actually choose to travel with China culture.
When you choose to enjoy strange mountains, strange water and natural scenery, you actually choose to walk with nature!
Yes, "where to go" depends on who you want to go with. "Where to go" is a subjective idea, which depends on the objective conditions of "who". The objective determines the subjective. Who you want to go with determines your final destination.
The debate on the Long March of that year can be regarded as a debate about "where to go and who to go with is more important". Comrades with left-leaning erroneous ideas want to attack Changsha and riot workers in central cities. They have their unshakable revolutionary goals as guidance. But they made a mistake on who to go with. . Mao decisively and rationally saw the ultimate goal and made a decision to walk with the interests of Red Army soldiers, resist Japan and save the country, and the overwhelming majority of the people in the country: the Long March. The big debate ended with the victory of "who to walk with". Our country still remembers the creed of "representing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of people in China"-walk with the people!
I remember the patriotic general Ji Hongchang wrote such a banner: "Follow the right person and go the right way". Soon after, he decided to go with the Red Army and the people, and finally got out of his confusion about where to go. Did a great thing worthy of the country and the people.
Conclusion: I think the debate between "where to go" and "who to go with" is a confrontation between idealism and materialism. Just as the debate between idealism and materialism is endless, the debate on this issue will never end. It is a great honor for us to answer this question from the perspective of materialism and use this question to prove our belief. Thank you!
I also think it's a question of direction and method. Where to go, when to go, and who to go with are the way. I know where to go, I have a direction, but no one is going with me, or I don't pay attention to who to go with, so that I am adversely affected on my way to the finish line, knowing that the road is going east, but I don't sincerely want to go southeast. And who to go with involves the question of who to go with. If I have wise people and good friends around me, in fact, I have a very clear direction in the process of moving forward with them, and there is no problem of seeking the direction again. Therefore, it is more important to focus on friends and peers.
Thank you, Madam President. Good afternoon. I don't know if you have such an experience, that is to say, as long as you are a favorite tourist attraction, you will get spiritual pleasure and satisfaction when you walk along with difficulties and obstacles in the process of going to it. This is exactly what I think today. Where to go is more important than who to go with.
First of all, what do you mean, where to go? Where to go refers not only to the goal, but also to the subject's goal and the belief born to achieve it. Where to go is the foundation of human action. Those people or groups who drift aimlessly are not included in today's debate.
Then who should I go with and how should I understand it? In a broad sense, companion refers to all objective existence outside the subject that acts on the realization of the goal. Similarly, we judge whether a series of objective beings walk with the subject, that is, whether they act on the same goal. Therefore, where to go and who to go with are accompanied in this debate, and there is no time difference. Please note that we don't deny and won't deny the importance and universality of our peers, but let our opponents know that where to go is more important than who to go with. What makes us make such a judgment? It's more important to talk about who to go with without the subject, and it's only meaningful if it affects the development of the subject movement, so the criterion for us to judge who is more important is to see who plays a decisive role in the nature and direction of the development of the subject movement.
In 1, where to go plays a decisive role in the development nature of the subject movement. The China Revolution took the socialist road rather than the capitalist road, which determined the nature of China society today. China's educational goal has changed from the simple pursuit of enrollment rate to the all-round development of morality, intelligence and physique, which determines the trend of advocating quality education now. The main goal may not remain the same, but as long as the laws of other governments and social development are in line with the fundamental interests of the people, the whole society will develop in a better direction. Of the two, who walks with you plays a decisive role in the development of the subject movement, which is external and influential. Although the influence of peers can be great, it cannot determine the nature and direction of the development of discipline movement. Just like the air we breathe every day, there is 78% nitrogen in the air, but only 2 1% oxygen. However, as we all know, it is not nitrogen that determines the nature of the air that supports people to breathe. Similarly, the goal of determining the nature and direction of the development of physical education is more important than the influence of peers.
"One World, One Dream" Only when today's world moves in the direction of peace and development can mankind achieve harmonious development.
To sum up, we think where to go is more important than who to go with.
Positive four debates (Chen Cheng):
Thank you, Chairman. Hello. I'm glad that other debaters have "walked hand in hand" for such a long time and dedicated a wonderful debate for everyone.
On behalf of us, please allow me to point out several mistakes made by the other debater in the debate just now: 1. The so-called special case of going alone with a goal and going with no goal is outside the scope of today's debate. It is incorrect for the other debater to deliberately expand the external factor of peer's role in the development of the discipline and ignore the internal factor of the decisive role of goals and beliefs in the development of the discipline. 2. It is inappropriate to argue today's debate by deciding who to go with, because we can't argue the relationship between the two, and it is more important to judge who is more important than the two, which plays a decisive role in the development of the discipline. It is also wrong for the debater to compare the importance of two factors with the importance of a single factor. Next, I reiterate and summarize our views on behalf of us:
First of all, it is necessary to clarify the profound connotation of where to go and who to walk with. Where to go refers to the belief in the extreme realization and persistence of the main goal. Who to walk with refers to all objective existence that acts on the realization of the goal. Furthermore, it is more important to know where to go and who to go with. The standard lies in who plays a decisive role in the development of the discipline, and where to go is a necessary condition for the development of the discipline, which determines the direction and nature of the development of the discipline movement. Who to go with can only promote or hinder the development of subject sports and affect the speed of development. These two points are two important and clear premises of this debate.
Bacon said that a lame man who never gets lost is better than a man who walks like a fly and gets lost. "No matter how the peers push and how they block, they can't make up their minds." World War II was Hitler, no matter how brilliant his record was and how strong his will alliance was. However, because their goals are wrong, this determines their fate of being judged by history. Throughout life, people are constantly faced with the judgment and discrimination of goals. If he stands at the focus of life and can smile at life, it must be that he keeps choosing the right goal to make this smile possible. Luo. Browning once said, "Ambition is the Big Dipper in the dark." A clear goal is like a lighthouse in the vast sea, guiding us forward. If I don't even know where to go, it's like a boat without a rudder and a horse without a title. Even if there are skilled sailors and Bole, we will wander and roam freely, but what is it in the end? If we say how far the road can go, it's not how long the route is, but who you travel with, then what's the point of going further without an end? Only by setting a goal can we better guide our behavior, and let us determine who will go with us in all the roads leading to the same goal. There's still a long way to go, Xiu Yuan. I will go up, down, left, right, east, west, north and south, but time can't be kept, so life must be constructive and have clear goals. Otherwise, such a long road of life will make Jiang Lang exhausted and at a loss. Do we have the motivation and motivation to realize the value of life? Therefore, as the old saying goes, "The ambition is not true, the heart is not hot, the heart is not hot, and it is not wise." Therefore, a clear goal is a powerful driving force for us to approach, so that we can pursue success with full energy.
Indeed, who you go with may affect our mood when we go and the atmosphere on the road, but you are an independent person, and you can completely eliminate or reduce this negative influence by yourself. Since who to go with means a small factor that can affect our mood, Wang Jingwei can say, "I am a patriot, but my companion has slightly influenced the domestic atmosphere."
Obviously, where to go is more important than who to go with. Finally, it ends with a couplet: "Where there is a will, there is a way, and cross the rubicon. One hundred and twenty Qin returns to Chu, and those who work hard will not bear it. Three thousand armour can swallow Wu. Let's be clear about our life goals, hold on to Yun Fan and rush to the ocean of life. thank you
Opposing party: Who is more important to walk with?
Argument against the other side (Yang Shanshan):
Good chairman, good judges, good everyone!
I admire the eloquence of another debater. These days, we are discussing which is more important, "who to go with" or "where to go". We define "who to walk with" as partners, tools and even opportunities in the process of progress, which is an objective environment, while understanding "where to go" as a goal is a subjective personal will. Therefore, we believe that although where to go is essential, who to go with has a greater impact on a person's life path and is naturally more important. 1, the objective environment affects the formation and development of subjective will, which is not innate, but gradually changes and develops under the influence of objective environment. As we all know, everyone is born with zero ideology, let alone subjective will. Even his independent personal consciousness is influenced by his parents and relatives around him. The growth course of the great scientist Einstein gave us a good example. When I was a child, other children were playing games outside, but he was concentrating on piling wood. His parents observed that he was willing to think, so they bought him many building blocks, books and so on. And his parents correctly guided him to think positively. It is precisely because of this correct guidance that love is true.