So far, China Insurance Research Institute has completed all the evaluation of the second batch of 10 vehicles in 20 19. In addition to Honda INSPIRE, this 10 model also includes Chevrolet Luze, FAW Pentium T77, BMW 325, Volkswagen Passat, Jeep Commander, Tucki G3, Toyota Corolla and Roewe RX5? MAX, Changan CS75? Plus. Looking at the evaluation results of all models, Honda INSPIRE did not perform well. Why is this happening?
0 1
After reading this evaluation result, Honda INSPIRE is anxious!
The elegant version of Honda INSPIRE model 20 19 TURBO participated in the evaluation. In terms of safety equipment configuration, this model is equipped with front airbags and front side airbags in the driver's seat and passenger's seat, but it is not equipped with AEB (automatic braking system). Therefore, a 20 19 hybrid clean vehicle equipped with AEB was used in the vehicle auxiliary safety index test.
Honda INSPIRE received a G (excellent) rating in terms of pedestrian safety index and vehicle auxiliary safety index. Referring to the previous evaluation results, most of these two items performed well, so this evaluation result of Honda INSPIRE is also reasonable, needless to say. However, the evaluation results are not satisfactory in terms of crashworthiness, maintenance economy index and occupant safety index. Why is this happening?
First of all, in terms of crashworthiness and maintenance economy index, Honda INSPIRE got a P (poor) rating. Why? Although its frontal collision performance is excellent, it only got 3 points in the rear-end collision. Among them, the crashworthiness score is 3 (out of 6), the maintenance economy score is 0 (out of 24), and the tail maintenance rate is 6.78%. So the final score is only 10.67 (out of 30).
Secondly, the passenger safety index in the car is evaluated as M (average). In this evaluation, although the roof strength and seat/headrest evaluation performed well, they did not perform well in the frontal 25% offset collision and side collision.
Looking at the second batch of 20 19 10 models, including independent brands and joint venture brands, the evaluation results of Honda INSPIRE are not satisfactory. As a "sister model" of Honda INSPIRE, you can also refer to the evaluation results of Accord (in fact, Honda INSPIRE and Accord can be regarded as one model, one belongs to Dongben and the other belongs to Guangben)-the evaluation of Accord 20 18 260TURBO Elite Edition released by C-NCAP in June 2065438+09 (including occupant protection, pedestrian protection, active safety and safety).
However, from the crash evaluation results of the second batch of 10 cars in 20 19, we can see that those Japanese cars that are often questioned as "unsafe" because of "thin skin and big stuffing" do not show insecurity, but some cars do well. In the evaluation of other batches, the outstanding performance also includes Honda models.
02
What is a frontal 25% offset collision?
Referring to the evaluation results of several vehicles by China Insurance Research Institute, the author is interested in the "frontal 25% offset crash test" in the "occupant safety index", because the main reason for the "Passat crash safety dispute" that has been raging before also comes from this link. Moreover, referring to all the evaluation results of the second batch 10 vehicles of China Insurance Research Institute in 20 19, it is found that the fundamental reason for the unsatisfactory performance of most "occupant safety indicators" is "frontal 25% offset collision". Why is this happening?
According to the official explanation of China Insurance Research Institute, the frontal 25% offset collision means that the vehicle is 64.4 km/h 1 km/h? Speed, 25% 1% overlap rate (driver's side) frontal collision fixed rigid guardrail; The test contents include personal injury, movement state and deformation of car body structure under this movement state.
This test is quoted from the earliest American IIHS (Highway Safety Insurance Association), and it is also the most challenging test item in the current crash test. Because the collision area is small, the pressure will increase a lot, so the requirements for vehicle safety performance are higher. It's like an exam. Car companies first need to understand the "intention" of the evaluation agency, and then they can "prescribe the right medicine"-the bumper should be bold and bold, and the body structure should be adjusted and adjusted to "test" good results.
On February 265438+2009+2/KLOC-0, China Automobile Research Institute started the first 25% offset crash test in China (also known as the right 25% small offset crash). Known as "the safest car on earth", XC60, a subsidiary of Volvo, participated in the evaluation and the results were satisfactory. But the author is curious, what will happen if other brands are tested?
Written at the end: According to statistics, compared with other collision cases, the right 25% small offset collision cases appear more, and because the first consciousness of people is to protect themselves when an accident occurs, the safety of the co-pilot is reduced. If the safety protection of the co-pilot seat is not in place, it may cause more serious injuries to the occupants. Therefore, it is precisely because of the increasingly strict collision assessment by the assessment agencies that car companies are "forced" to improve the quality and safety of vehicles.
Pay attention to the car industry, talk about the car number, and have a chance to win beautiful small gifts through interaction!
This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.