Are the six measures of discipline inspection effective? Three reasons prove that Xie Yalong is by no means the biggest fish.
With the further development of anti-gambling and anti-corruption in football, it is obvious that the nature of the action has changed from the initial anti-gambling to the current anti-corruption stage, which further proves that the problem of football in China is not only a sports problem, but also a complex social problem. Recently, it is not difficult to see the determination and strength of the central authorities to discipline football and purify the official atmosphere from Director Liu Peng's speech. At the same time, the General Administration of Sports also announced six measures to control football corruption, and everyone reached a consensus on deepening the professionalization reform. Although all actions seem to lag behind, the result that corrupt officials finally fall into the French Open is very gratifying. Nowadays, people are still arguing, is Xie Yalong the biggest fish? I hope that while you are paying attention, you don't have the mentality of watching the excitement and not being afraid of big things. You always want to catch big fish, so you should look at the whole incident more rationally. After a period of thinking and understanding about the structure of the General Administration of Sports, I have mastered some information. In my opinion, there are three reasons to prove that Xie Yalong is by no means the biggest fish behind the scenes. First of all, Xie Yalong is an administrative official. He belongs to another kind of corruption and has special circumstances. After Nan Yong was arrested, I was very suspicious when people believed that Xie Yalong, who claimed to be a "white-faced scholar", did not have the same bad behavior. In China's administrative units, the top leaders usually have too much power, and they are all powerful, sometimes they can manage both money and people. Obviously, there are many loopholes in its supervision and restraint measures, and there is no accountability system. Since major events and decisions involving interests cannot escape the control of the top leader, will the top leader know nothing about what the second-in-command did when Xie Yalong and Nan Yong were in charge of the Football Association? This is unreasonable. Xie Yalong is definitely different from Nan Yong on the issue of corruption. He is a layman and an administrative official, while the latter is an expert and a technical official. Nan Yong's corruption is naturally bottom-up. He is familiar with clubs, referees, players and the rules of football. He will form a bond of interest with these people, form a community of interests, and contain them through his own power to gain benefits. Xie Yalong obviously wouldn't do that. If he wants corruption, he won't mend the edges. Must be a relatively large number of projects, at least at the national team level. On the issue of Xianghe base, from site selection to construction to management, many problems are involved, which is almost impossible to complete within the management authority of a football association president. So here, we have to ask, is there a bigger official behind Xie Yalong who takes advantage of his power to make profits? If that's the case, then maybe the corruption in Xie Yalong is only a small head, and the culprit is behind it. As we all know, the football sports management center and the Football Association are a team with two brands. The former, as an administrative unit, is under the unified management of the State Sports General Administration, and the football management center is a bureau-level unit. There is indeed a supervision department under the General Administration to supervise whether there are illegal acts in various departments. Then, while the football shady scene is staged repeatedly, why does this unit under the General Administration exist in name only and not take immediate substantive measures? There are many possibilities, because the supervision department at the same level has no right to supervise the organization and management of the football center, or someone is in the way to stop it. We don't know. However, from the beginning of operation, it is not difficult to see that the supervision department under the General Administration often has the problem of left pocket and right pocket, which is really ineffective. Third, since Yuan Weimin, countless times of "inaction" have made people feel meaningful ... Anyone who has read the book "Yuan Weimin and Sports Fengyun" knows that the author praised Yuan Weimin for his great contribution to China sports all his life, but also truly showed his helplessness in inaction on football issues. Yuan Weimin himself felt that there was too much resistance in doing anything. And we have to ask, why can't you do anything as the director of the General Administration of Sports, and where is the resistance? From the women's volleyball and other events, we can see how enterprising Yuan Weimin is, and how can he be helpless when it comes to football? Is there an untouchable force in it? As a matter of fact, since Yan Shiduo, there has been an endless stream of shady football in China. Too many "inaction" and "inaction" have made our football environment extremely bad, and it goes without saying that professional leagues are on the verge of bankruptcy. In order to solve this problem, we must answer these question marks. Therefore, according to various appearances, I boldly predict that Xie Yalong is by no means the biggest fish, and there must be more people involved behind the scenes. Now that the anti-gambling and anti-vice campaign has risen to the anti-corruption stage, we must stick to it thoroughly, let all the question marks in the past find answers, and don't let the "tiger" and "lion" report again. Feifei: The last agreement.