1993 1 1 month, Jia was suddenly dismissed by the Independent Commission Against Corruption. Because he refused to disclose the reason for dismissing Jia on the grounds of confidentiality, there was an uproar in the society for a time. At that time, the Legislative Council used the powers and privileges ordinance conferred by colonial laws to decide to set up a commission of inquiry to verify the dismissal. This is the first time that the Legislative Council has invoked the Privileges Ordinance.
On 1 December 1993, Mrs Selina CHOW, a Legislative Councillor, moved a motion at the meeting to investigate the details of the termination of the employment of Mr Jia, Senior Assistant Director of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) on 10 November 1993. According to section 9(2) of the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance (Chapter 102). The Legislative Council Panel on Security is authorized to exercise the powers conferred by section 9( 1) of the Ordinance. The bill was finally passed.
As there was no precedent to follow before the first application of the Powers and Privileges Ordinance by the Legislative Council, on 25 May 1994, the Legislative Council moved a motion to make corresponding rules for the inquiry of the Security Guard. After seeing the confidential information submitted by ICAC, the security team also summoned relevant persons to the Legislative Council to answer questions. Jia claimed in the Legislative Council that he was unreasonably dismissed, discriminated against by race and not treated well by foreigners. Jia even disclosed in the Legislative Council that ICAC had secretly monitored senior government officials, including Anson Chan. On the other hand, the TV program "Proceedings" of Radio Television Hong Kong reported the Jia incident on1April 14, May 19 and1October 20, respectively, as well as Xu's speech at the investigation committee of the Legislative Council.
"During the hearing, the panel held 26 meetings; These included eight public hearings and watching a video tape. The tribunal heard the evidence of four witnesses, including Xu and the Commissioner of the Independent Commission Against Corruption. In the second and fourth chapters of this report, the team also summarized the reasons for dismissing Mr. Xu put forward by the Commissioner of the Independent Commission Against Corruption, the circumstances that Mr. Xu said led to his dismissal and other relevant evidence. "
The investigation was completed before 1994 1 1 month, and it was considered that it was a reasonable decision to dismiss Jia. On November 2, 1994, Mrs Selina CHOW presented the investigation report to the Legislative Council General Assembly on behalf of the investigation committee and delivered a speech. Due to the confidentiality regulations, the public can't know the reason for dismissing Jia. However, there are different versions of this story. As early as 1993, when Jia was dismissed, some media reported that Jia had unusual connections with the underworld and was dismissed. 19931February 14, Radio Television Hong Kong's Media Spring and Autumn Annals said: "The Jia incident contains triad, corruption, justice and other elements, attracting media reports. Is the media used here? " It was also reported that Jia Ceng had secret contact with the Ministry of National Security of the Beijing government, which was unacceptable to the Hong Kong government, so Jia was dismissed. All kinds of statements can't be confirmed.
Less than two weeks before the by-election of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong Island on February 2, 2007, Jia Yu held a press conference on February 2, 2007, accusing Anson Chan of illegally obtaining a 100% mortgage on February 2, 2007, and questioning Chen Fang. Democrats accused this of being an election project, with the aim of discrediting Anson Chan for the purpose of by-election.