The lawyer of Sichuan Huaxi Law Firm, the agent of Luo's parents, said that Luo Hongling's death was caused by her husband Cheng's concealing homosexual tendencies and cheating on marriage, which triggered a fierce conflict between the two sides. In the process of Luo's death by jumping off a building, Cheng had a major fault, and failed to take preventive measures against Luo Hongling's suicidal thoughts and behaviors caused by his words and deeds, which directly led to the tragedy. Cheng repeatedly treated Luo Hongling with extreme mental stimulation, which led to Luo Hongling's serious psychological depression tendency. Cheng did not fulfill the legal obligation of husband and wife to help each other at all. His fault and inaction have a causal relationship with Luo's death, and he is responsible for at least 50%. Requested Wuhou court to award Cheng compensation for Luo's parents' death compensation and spiritual comfort of more than 630,000 yuan.

On September 20th, 20 12, Wuhou court accepted the case. 165438+1October 6, the court heard the case in private because it involved the privacy of the parties. During the trial, Cheng did not appear in court, but entrusted his attorney to appear in court. Lawyer Cheng said that Luo Hongling fell to her death, and Cheng did not constitute infringement or legal inaction. There is no legal causal relationship between Cheng's words and deeds and Luo's death, and Cheng should not bear the responsibility. Cheng's behavior does not constitute cheating marriage, and his combination with Luo conforms to the provisions of the marriage law. Luo' s parents' claims are unfounded in the law, and Cheng has already paid 32,000 yuan.

The Wuhou court held that the law did not prohibit citizens' homosexual tendencies and behaviors. Therefore, whether Luo Hongling and Cheng knew each other before marriage and whether they had homosexual tendencies does not affect the legal effect of voluntary registration. Luo's parents claimed that Cheng cheated the marriage, but the court refused to support it. When there is a contradiction between husband and wife, the emotional injury and emotional stimulation are two-way, and the ways to deal with the contradiction are also diverse. Suicide by jumping off a building is not the inevitable and only way for Luo to disclose his sexual orientation. Therefore, the court rejected the statement that there was a causal relationship between Cheng's behavior and Luo's death.

In addition, Luo Hongling was a person with full capacity for civil conduct before her death, and Luo herself was the subject who took legal responsibility for the control of her emotions and the consequences of her actions. Whether Cheng has played the role of comfort, care, prevention and stop does not lead to the change and transfer of the subject of legal responsibility. The evidence of Luo's parents' prosecution is insufficient and the court does not support it. At the beginning of 20 13 1, the court ruled that Luo's parents' claims were rejected. Luo's parents refused to accept the appeal and will appeal to Chengdu Intermediate People's Court.