Some netizens believe that dozens of LLM candidates in China Renmin University have been re-examined this time after their re-examination scores were recorded as 0; Some netizens also believe that these candidates did violate the relevant regulations in the re-examination of postgraduate exams, and it is understandable to make such behavior. So why is the current postgraduate report the norm? The author will talk about his own views.
First, the postgraduate re-examination did violate the relevant regulations. First of all, the author would like to say that the postgraduate re-examination did violate the relevant regulations, because every candidate signed a letter of commitment for the integrity re-examination when conducting the postgraduate re-examination. In fact, some candidates didn't take the exam seriously and responsibly when they took the second interview, so after they took the second interview, they often talked about the related contents of the second interview in QQ and WeChat groups. In fact, the scope of the re-examination questions is limited, and its behavior has actually constituted a violation of the questions, so there is nothing wrong with this behavior being reported later.
Second, under the situation that the postgraduate entrance examination is involuted, candidates pursue fairness in the examination. Generally speaking, the postgraduate entrance examination is divided into two parts, one is written examination and the other is interview. The queuing system is implemented in the interview process. If the person who takes the lead in answering the interview announces the re-examination contents to others in the group chat, it will affect the fairness in the postgraduate entrance examination. Now in the atmosphere of national postgraduate entrance examination, postgraduate entrance examination has entered an involution situation. In this context, candidates are more interested in the fairness of the exam, so some candidates choose this means to pursue the fairness of the exam.
Third, in the event that the postgraduate qualification of Shanghai Normal University was cancelled, the reporter's behavior was indeed improper. In this incident, the author thinks that the reporter's behavior is really inappropriate, because he chose to report at this point in time and missed the opportunity to open the graduate adjustment system, which would make those who were disqualified from graduate studies have no school. If the reporter wants to report it, he can report it at the second interview.