Author: He reposted from: original hits on this site: 1022
Debate on "Diligence is more important than method/method is more important than diligence" for middle school students.
Debate: Diligence is more important than method.
Method is more important than diligence.
Positive: grade two 1 class team.
Opposing party: Class 1 (2), Class 1 (3) combined,
President: He.
Judge: Wu Weijun Wu Huifa Kong Hanxiang.
Timekeepers: Shen Qunchao, Jin, Qian, Ryan.
Recorders: Shen Linzhi, Sun Xiaoting, Gu.
Service: Wang Junjie.
Time: 5th and 6th classes on June 9th, 2006.
Venue: Multimedia Classroom of Ganpu Middle School
Chairman: Hello, teachers and students!
As we all know, methods and diligence are very important for middle school students' learning, but is diligence more important than methods? Or is method more important than diligence? Today, Class Two (1), Class Two (2) and Class Three (3) of Senior High School have a debate on this issue to help us solve this mystery.
Next, please allow me to introduce the lineups of the two participating teams.
Sitting on my right is Fang Er (1), whose position is "diligence is more important than method".
One debate: Jinyuan, two debates: Tang, three debates: Xia, and four debates: Jin.
Sitting on my left are the opposing Class 1 (2) and Class 1 (3) United. Their view is that "method is more important than diligence".
One debate: Hu, two debates: Lu, three debates: Xu, and four debates: Wu.
Now please pay attention to the debaters on both sides, and I will read out the schedule and rules.
I. Timetable
1, start parameter
(1) First debate statement: 3 minutes.
(2) The first debate of the opposing side: 3 minutes.
2. Attacks and debates
(1) Positive debate, choose opposing debate or opposing debate for one-on-one attack and debate, and each party takes 1 minute.
(2) The opponent's second debate chooses the second debate or the third debate for one-on-one confrontation and debate, and each party takes 1 minute.
(3) In the positive three debates, it takes 1 minute for each party to choose the negative two debates or the one-on-one debate three debates.
(4) The opposing side chooses a positive two-way debate or a three-way debate for one-on-one confrontation and debate, each time 1 minute.
(5) In the offensive and defensive stage, all questions raised by players cannot exceed 10 second.
3. Summary of attacks and debates
(1) Summary of the first argument of the opposing side: It takes 1.5 minutes.
(2) Summary of positive arguments: It takes 1.5 minutes.
4. Free debate
Both sides need five minutes.
5. Concluding remarks
(1) The closing arguments of the opposing arguments took 3 minutes.
(2) The closing statement of the Square Four Debates takes 3 minutes.
Second, the detailed rules of the debate.
1, time prompt
In the free debate stage, when each party has 30 seconds left to use, the timekeeper will remind him by language, and when the time is up, the timekeeper will remind him to stop speaking. In the summary stage of attack and defense, when each side has 10 seconds left, the timekeeper will remind him in words, and when the time is up, the timekeeper will remind him to stop speaking. At other stages, when each player still has 30 seconds of fashion time, the timekeeper will remind him in words, and when the time is up, the timekeeper will remind him to stop speaking. The debater must stop speaking when the timekeeper reminds him.
2. Introduction meeting; exhibition
Advocate impromptu statements and quote classics appropriately.
3. Opening remarks
There is no need to dwell too much on the theoretical level in the opening argument. The argument requires strong logic and conciseness.
4. Attacks and debates
(1) The debate on offense and defense begins with two debates, and the pros and cons alternate.
(2) The defense shall be designated by the attacker at will, and the number of times is not limited. Both the offensive and defensive sides must complete this round of attack and defense independently, and cannot be replaced in the middle.
(3) In each round of attack and defense, the defense can ask questions, and both sides must answer each other's questions positively, and the questions and answers should be concise and clear. Repeated questions and evasive questions will be deducted. If one party's time is full, the other debater can play at will (make a statement or continue to ask questions) within a limited time.
5. Free debate
The pros and cons automatically take turns to speak.
The speaker's seat marks the end of the speech, that is, the beginning of the other party's speech. The opposing debater must speak immediately, and if there is a pause, it will be counted as the time spent by the next party who should speak.
There is no limit to the order in which the same debater speaks. If one party runs out of time, the other party can continue to speak or signal the chairman to give up speaking.
Free debate provides confrontation, and the party who avoids confrontation more than twice on important issues will be deducted. If the questions that both sides have answered clearly are still entangled, points will be deducted appropriately.
6. Summary and conclusion of attack and defense
Both sides of the debate should summarize and summarize the overall situation of the debate; Regardless of the on-site debate, memorize the materials prepared in advance and deduct points appropriately.
Now I declare the game officially started. First of all, from the first part-the opening argument. Let's invite Founder and Jinyuan to debate for 3 minutes.
A positive debate: hello, chairmen of the judges! The other party is friendly! Hello, classmates!
I am the number one debater, and we all agree that diligence is more important than method.
Why do we have such a view? Naturally, thousands of examples prompt us to believe this. At all times and in all countries, several great men have succeeded by their own methods. I can assert that there is no such thing. Can you believe it? It's hard to find such an example. Do you think a smart and diligent person is valued or a smart person is valued more? There is no doubt about the answer. The former is more ideal. From all fields, diligence is more important than method. Don't you know that the method is based on diligence? The method is just a diligent child. What ability does it have to ride on mom's head? If you say yes, does it mean that you are such a rebellious child? A hard work, a harvest, the ancients practiced martial arts, heard chicken dance, studied literature, and borrowed the light from the wall. What did it show from two aspects: literature and martial arts? Nature is the importance of hard work. Only hard work can make you read a lot of books. Only hard work can make you go further. Only hard work can exercise your strong will. Since hard work has played such a big role, what reason do you have to say that the method is better? Tall buildings on the ground can easily fall if they don't climb, which is terrible. Diligence is a state of mind and a driving force for learning. Diligence has been our parents' mantra since we went to school. If you say that method is more important than diligence, does it mean that you are not satisfied with your parents? In our current research, we keep doing the same type of problems over and over again. According to you, does it mean that you don't agree with the teacher's teaching policy and you have doubts about the teaching level of the school? Since you think method is more important than diligence, you don't need to do these questions. You "geniuses" should be able to be admitted to universities, and have a deeper understanding of Comrade Hu Jintao's persistence in studying hard and practicing Theory of Three Represents's requirements in a down-to-earth manner. Comrade Hu Jintao pointed out that diligent study is the prerequisite for party member to enhance party spirit, improve skills and do a good job. Since Hu Jintao admitted the importance of diligence in such an important meeting, it can be seen that diligence occupies a dominant position in our life, and he never mentioned the word "method". As we all know, Lu Xun, who gave up medicine to become a writer, was once called a "genius". He said, "Where there is a genius, I will use other people's coffee time to write!" Obviously, isn't his great achievement the crystallization of diligence? People have taken it for granted that "diligence is the first factor of success", and diligence is naturally greater than everything. Then your method is useless at all. Don't you know that celebrities like Leonardo da Vinci painted eggs, Wang Xizhi practiced calligraphy, Faraday invented the electric motor, and Watt invented the steam engine because of hard work? Genius lies in diligence, knowledge lies in accumulation, and the story of stupid birds flying first shows that "diligence can make up for clumsiness" Since diligence can make up for it, what else can diligence not surpass? Can your method go beyond the limit? No, but our diligence can go beyond the limit and reach the peak.
Thank you! (Applause)
PRESIDENT: Thank you for your affirmative debate. Let's invite opposing debates. Let's talk for three minutes.
The opposing side argued: Thank you, Madam President! Hello everyone!
The theme of our debate is that method is more important than diligence.
For learning, methods and diligence are both essential, but in contrast, methods are more important than diligence. So we summarized the following three points.
(1) Fashe
Now is the dawn of knowledge economy. Efficiency is critical. Without methods, there will be no efficiency. The reward you get is output, not the time and energy you put into your work. Your contribution depends on your achievements in your field. Why not use methods to reduce energy and get more returns? Darwin, a British biologist, said: "The most valuable knowledge is knowledge about methods", which is more practical today.
(2) the importance of methods to learning
For us, methods are also the reason for most learning. If the method is wrong, the result will be
Just do the opposite, in vain, thankless, do not know the improper methods, learning is worthless. Indeed, Archimedes said, "Give me a fulcrum and I can move the whole earth." Without the right tools, things will become difficult, and the method is just like using the right tools, which makes us get twice the result with half the effort.
(3) the life significance of the method
The "future" illiterates are no longer illiterate people, but people who can't learn, but until today, the other debater has not understood its true meaning and the essence of its so-called culture. Its connotation is that we middle school students can only succeed if we master the methods. If the other debater's parents enroll you in a cram school, you should go there to learn methods. I have never heard of anyone studying hard there. For example, the elderly who have been busy in our family all their lives go out early every day and return to work diligently. However, according to relevant data, each farmer in China can produce 1.500 kg of corn every year, while farmers in the United States use scientific methods to farm mechanically, and a farmer can produce 1.500 tons of corn every year. The big difference is that the second one represents the importance of the method. As you can imagine, this is still the world in all fields. It can be seen that the method is more important than diligence, which finally proves the stable position of the method. Thank you!
(Applause)
PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you, Hu. From the speeches of the two players on both sides, we can see that they are very confident and will win. Next, we will enter the stage of criticism and debate to test the individual's adaptability. First of all, please argue in two ways. You can choose the other party to ask questions in two or three-party arguments. Time consumption per side 1 min. Let's leave now.
Two debates on the positive side (selected crimes and debates)
1, method is not supreme, diligence makes genius, and genius is 99% sweat and 1% inspiration.
2. Diligence is not limited to exploration. Diligence is the twin brother of wisdom. Diligence is related to method mining. Where is it? What are the examples of being admitted to a university? How high is the goal for the country? Diligence is the main thing.
How can we get there without diligence? Where does diligence come from?
4. Where did the method come from? If people are not diligent, where can they get the method? Information is obtained through hard work. Where does the computer come from? Think with your brain. The computer is the invention of the human brain, and the method is not dispensable.
5. How can the method itself be useful?
6. The method is obtained by hard work. In 2000, there was no way without diligence.
Oppose debate (selected crimes and debates)
1. Do you have a goal in your study? What's the goal?
2. Can't you read thousands of books?
3. The method is not clever. Wang Xizhi's calligraphy practice is not only based on diligence. If there is no way, how can he have his own characteristics?
4. Can you concentrate on class or study by yourself?
5, you know how to catch loopholes, this is the right way!
6. Is learning not only books but also books? Have you never doubted and criticized the ideas and contents in the book?
7. Don't you read any other theoretical books except some interesting books such as novels? Do you never take notes when reading?
Three positive arguments (selected crimes and arguments)
1, the method is based on diligence.
We have many examples to prove that diligence is more important than method, but the other side has few examples to prove it.
Have you heard of Chen Zengzhi? How did he get his doctorate?
I don't think you know how to find it from beginning to end. Where does the lack of diligence come from? Your message comes from hard work.
5. What is the essence of diligence? If you don't even understand the essence of diligence, I suggest you take a class in the opposite primary school.
6. Excuse me, another debater, which one of you is always using the so-called method to calculate instead of being diligent?
Three arguments of the other side (selected crimes and arguments)
1. Ask your opponent to do two questions: (1)1+2+3+...+100 =?
(2) 100+200+……+ 10000=?
Please answer directly. You can't solve it if you don't know. How many days have you counted? One day, right? You are diligent. Since you are diligent, please answer. You said you found guests by diligence. Do you count? It seems that it is faster to use the method!
Can you often use reference books?
Can you use every little time to study?
Do you often argue with your classmates about your study? By diligence or by method.
6. Besides memorizing formula theorems, do you know how they are derived? It depends on the method.
President: OK, thank you for your wonderful performance. Next, we enter the offensive and defensive summary stage. Please make a summary of 1.5 minutes.
Argument: Dear students, after this fierce war of words, we still support the view that "diligence is more important than method".
Diligence is based on methods. If you are not diligent, how can you find a way? Try to explore ways. Everything has a method, and the method can speed up the pace. But if you only rely on speed to explore, even if there is no way, you will find a way. People without hair can't fly high, and birds without hair can't spread their wings. The same person cannot stand out without a solid foundation, so where does the solid foundation come from? From the perspective of human diligence, diligence will straighten out thinking, have inspiration flashes, and exercise logical thinking ability.
Various examples illustrate the importance of diligence. There are countless examples at all times, at home and abroad. How many people are still successful? Are they wrong?
Diligence is a powerful lever to change reality and a prerequisite for success. We are all young, and life has shown us a beautiful picture. It is not the sadness of the trackers on the Volga River, nor the sadness of the last supper, but the galloping horse is full of energy and screams in the galloping horse!
Students, many facts have proved that diligence is the cornerstone of success. So we support "diligence is more important than method". Thank you all. (warm applause)
Chairman; Thank you for your argument. Let's ask the other side to make an offensive and defensive summary. The time is 1.5 minutes.
The opponent argued: Thank you, Madam President, thank you all! After fierce debate, we still insist on the view that "method is more important than diligence".
Yes, diligence is the traditional virtue of the Chinese nation, but one thing is that it is 2 1 century, not ancient times. The change of thought and action is a sign of the progress of human civilization. We must "choose the good and follow it, and change the bad." We must choose something that meets the needs of the times. Of course, the method is very important. Where can I be diligent without methods? Where did the success come from? As another debater emphasized, there are all kinds of diligence, but everything you do is just a waste of time and energy. The ancients said that "learning alone without friends is ignorant", that is to say, it is ignorant not to associate with people, not to learn from teachers, and to study hard again. It can be seen that diligence is pale compared with methods. We don't deny diligence, but the importance of various methods of proof is undeniable. Method is the center of learning. There is no way, just like getting lost. You can only find a way out with "diligence" and a very small percentage, but with the method, just like with a compass, you can control everything. Start learning, the method is the key! Thank you! (Applause warmly)
PRESIDENT: Thank you for your debate. Now enter the stage of free debate, and each side will spend five minutes.
(Then the two sides entered the stage of free debate, which was very intense. Here is a brief summary of the positive and negative points. )
Pro: 1. Didn't your data "method" come from our efforts? Be diligent in discovery and analysis, otherwise how can you explain the source of information in your hand?
2, a hard work, a harvest, diligence can be harvested, and the method is only a dispensable way, can efficiency be greater than diligence?
3. How long did it take you to come up with a method? With our current IQ, can we do it for one second? Try to use your diligence to think before you answer, ok?
What is the 99999 power of 4.99999? Answer me in one second. Do it your way. It's dark. We will wait for you to surrender. Who can tell me?
I don't think you understand a question, the source of the method? Where did it come from?
6. Who invented the computer? Or is it the result of painstaking experiments and efforts? What's your explanation?
7. Diligence can change a person's fate. Isn't Zhang Haidi an example? Can you name a talent who succeeded only by methods?
8. Give you a way. If you understand, you will understand. If you don't understand, you don't understand. But don't work hard, can you understand? Can diligence make up for it?
9. Diligence is a natural magnet, which can attract all beautiful things, so diligence can also attract methods, can't it?
10, Diligence is the twin of wisdom, laziness is the brother of stupidity. Since wisdom and diligence are linked, the implication is that there is no wisdom and no method without diligence. Is there a problem?
1 1. How did your method come into being? Before the method was explored, people still achieved something. The process before they find a way is diligence. Did they borrow it? Please answer at once.
12, a sunny fertile soil, but farmers are too lazy to cultivate, it will become a wasteland, a good modern school and experienced teachers, but if students are too lazy to listen and study, then you still know nothing. Isn't this a good explanation that only diligence can discover everything, including methods?
13, Zhuge Liang's story, Zhang Pu's studious story, Confucius' boyhood story, Qi Baishi's "Learning in a Corner", etc. Shall I make a list for you?
14, stating that we haven't learned all the Chinese characters in China, but we are prepared to study hard.
15. When you fail because you are not diligent, do you still think that method is more important than diligence?
16, if diligence is not important, then why should the teacher educate us to study hard? Do you think the teacher is wrong?
(warm applause)
Against:
1. Is diligence the traditional virtue of the Chinese nation?
2. What is the meaning of "goodness" in "choose goodness and follow it"?
3. Excuse me, another debater, is a project fast and efficient, or slow and efficient?
4. So, compared with drilling holes in springs, does it take longer or shorter time to "throw stones through"?
Then, another debater, "dripping water wears away the stone" is just hard training, and drilling holes by the spring is the right way, don't you think?
6. The other debater, do you need money for your daily life? What about your financial resources? What about your parents?
7, the old saying goes: "A gentleman loves money and takes it properly!" Isn't your parents' job also a way to make money? Doesn't this mean that lifestyle is more important than diligence?
8. Can your opponent tell me what "the shortest line segment between two points" means?
9, and then the line segment also reflects the method, and diligence is just a curve. Although it will arrive, it seems a bit complicated!
10, what is the meaning of diligence?
1 1, I think as a student, you come to school to learn skills and methods, not to be diligent!
12, China's traditional virtue is diligence, but in this era when the knowledge economy has begun to take shape, a commentator said that methods are more important than knowledge, directions are more important than methods, attitudes are more important than directions, and perseverance is more important than attitudes.
13, your opponent, what is your goal? Then, ask another debater, do you think goals are helpful to your study?
14, then another debater, don't you think goal is a decisive and good way to learn?
15, do you do eye exercises every day? Why are you doing this? Isn't this a good way to protect your eyes?
16, can you always be diligent to protect your eyes? What is the explanation of "knowing is knowing, not knowing is not knowing", "being eager to learn and not ashamed to ask questions" and "having a threesome, there must be a teacher"?
(Applause warmly)
PRESIDENT: Thank you for the wonderful free debate. Let's go to the last link-the conclusion. First, please ask the other party to speak for three minutes.
Four objections: Thank you, Chairman! The opposing debater! Hello everyone!
From the beginning, we never denied the importance of diligence in learning. The other party's theory seems to be classic, but it is not realistic.
2 1 century illiterates are not illiterate people, but people who cannot learn. Nowadays, people are facing the employment entrance examination, which has become the most urgent problem in life. In the era of information explosion, it is urgent to acquire the most knowledge through the most effective learning methods. A complete set of learning methods can not only enhance self-confidence, but also achieve success in the field of learning.
People often say: When you study in thousands of books and walk in Wan Li Road, you have to be enlightened by a famous teacher. What is enlightenment by a famous teacher? Undoubtedly, it is mainly the method. Those who learn piano, sword, shooting, swimming and hire coaches with high salaries just want to learn methods.
Learning should pay attention to learning methods, thinking should pay attention to thinking methods, and innovation should pay attention to innovative methods. The reason why there are books about methods in society is that methods are too important for a person's success. However, compared with methods, diligence is so unimportant. We often attend various classes and go there to learn methods, but few people spend money to study hard.
Diligence can only make you succeed for a while, but you can't achieve it for a lifetime, just like: "Give a man a fish for a meal and teach him to fish for a lifetime." How right!
To say "stupid birds fly first", stupid birds fly first because they have mastered the flight method. What's more, it's a 2 1 century society, not an era with so many stupid birds.
As the saying goes, "well done, get twice the result with half the effort." What is said here is that the method is right, twice the result with half the effort, four times inside and outside!
Gauss can calculate the result of 1+2+3+ ...+100 because he can think and come up with laws. If they just calculate like everyone else, today's laws simply don't exist.
Friends! 2 1 century is the era of economic information and methods, but there is too little diligence. I believe that methods can help me succeed.
So we believe that methods are more important than diligence! Thank you! (Applause warmly)
PRESIDENT: Thank you for your wonderful speeches on the four opposing debates. Let's invite Zheng Si Debate to make a concluding speech.
Four arguments: thank you, Mr. chairman, and hello everyone!
We always think that diligence is more important than method. Just now, another debater did not deny diligence, that is, he admitted that there are still 300 million illiterates in China. Dare to ask the other debater, which one of you has been keeping one of the best grades in the school by the so-called method instead of studying hard? I don't think so!
After all, diligence makes genius, laziness makes mediocrity.
Isn't this enough to show that the views held by opposing defense friends are ridiculous? From ancient times to the present, "diligence" is the truth, and diligence can make up for it. Chen studied hard, practiced hard, and became a famous doctor. Is this fake? Are the real people and stories in history also fabricated? Or is the other debater lazy and self-deprecating?
Looking back, China has been dusty for thousands of years, and the storm is stirring. How many great men have stood in the long river of history, and their spirit has remained unchanged for thousands of years. Su Xun came from behind, Bai Juyi's tongue became sore, Qi Baishi grinded the stone into mud, Pu Songling failed to become famous, Liu Kun smelled the chicken and danced, Sun Jing and Su Qin hung the beam and stabbed the stocks. Aren't their spirits the embodiment of "diligence"? It is these great men who spread all over the Millennium history, achieved Millennium glory, carried forward ancient civilization, left behind treasures and formed national culture, but they were formed by diligence!
It can be seen how important diligence is.
Between genius and diligence, I chose diligence without hesitation. Diligence is the midwife of almost all achievements in the world. "Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration. This is Edison's evaluation of diligence. As the greatest scientist in the world, he thinks that it is diligence rather than genius that makes him successful. Behind 99% sweat is hard work and repeated research.
I remember a philosopher said: There are two kinds of creatures that can climb the pyramids in the world: an eagle and a snail. Whether it is an eagle with extraordinary talent or a snail with mediocre qualifications, it is inseparable from two words-diligence to climb the spire and overlook Wan Li.
A person's progress and success, environment, opportunities, knowledge of nature and other external factors are important, but more importantly, it depends on their own diligence and efforts. Without diligence, no talented eagle can but sigh with empty wings. With the spirit of diligence, even slow-moving snails can stand on the top of the tower and watch the sunset thunder in Qian Shan and the floating clouds in Wan Li.
The importance of diligence is very obvious under countless evidences from all over the world. In our short study life, there are dozens of articles about diligence in textbooks, which shows the importance of diligence in today's society. However, looking around the world, it seems that few people succeed through methods. In ancient times, Zhong Yong had a genius brain, but in the end he became a mortal. Now there are hundreds of learning methods circulating in advertisements, and all kinds of self-proclaimed effects are amazing. You can write hundreds of words in half an hour. Is this fallacy the learning method mentioned by the other debater? So really, go home after studying for a few days, why study hard for ten years? But so far, it seems that no one has reached such a state.
Qin Gui studied hard for ten years and was admitted as the top scholar. Even traitors know this truth. I don't think the other side will understand the debate!
All kinds of examples can undoubtedly show that diligence makes genius, and genius is produced by this truth. It is diligence that brings forth the new, a generation of literary giant Lu Xun, a great scientist Newton, Shakespeare, Confucius ... which great man climbed to the peak of art by the so-called method without diligence? Look at Zhang Heng, who lives in the world with diligence without asking for anything, and Han Yu, who is good at diligence but poor in interest. He has good training that diligence can make up for his shortcomings, and he has a talent for hard work. Hua's telling the truth and diligence are undoubtedly the key to success. Take the lead diligently, and you will achieve something.
So we firmly believe that diligence is more important than method, thank you!
Comments: Chairman! Representatives for and against! Dear students!
Say the content first. Zheng Fang can fully cite examples to emphasize the importance of diligence, and can use a variety of rhetorical devices to elaborate, which is very good! But the tone is too absolute. While emphasizing diligence, we should not deny the great role played by methods. On the other hand, while not denying the importance of diligence, we can proceed from today's social reality, elaborate and express clearly from three angles. In the stage of attack and defense, the questions raised by the two opposing arguments are refuted, which makes them fall into a passive position, while the three opposing arguments can take some remedial measures at the prompt of their peers, but below. The three opposing arguments can also ask some clever questions at the right time, which makes the two positive arguments difficult to answer. The first three arguments are sharp and witty, and they can seize the first two arguments and make a fierce counterattack. At this point, in the offensive and defensive stage, both sides have their own offensive and defensive strategies, and the counter-attack strategy prevails. Debate on the content is beneficial to the opposing side, but it is not easy for the right side to grasp many examples of hard-working talents and quote them, thus forming a deadlock. At this stage, the counter-measure strategy has the upper hand!
Now let me turn to the technical aspects of the debate. In terms of reaction, we feel that both positive and negative aspects are quite fast. In language, they are all sharp, but they are too absolute in the specific explanation of a certain problem. The grasp of the loopholes in the other party's speech needs to be strengthened, and the grasp of the correctness of their own speech and the timing of attack needs to be further improved. After many rounds of exchanges between the two sides, both sides have loopholes. However, in comparison, the two problems of the design of opposing three debates once had a slight advantage in the offensive and defensive stage.
In terms of attitude, we feel that the frontal offensive is quite fierce, with one buckle and one buckle. However, I think it will be more complete if we can be modest in the general trend and momentum. There are also several opponents who are calm. They can calmly reflect on each other's views and refute them under pressure, forming a close situation. Two debates and three debates of opponents are a typical example.
The free debate is quite exciting. There are many exchanges between the two sides, hand-to-hand combat and head-on confrontation. They all performed well, but there are still some problems: the momentum is more than enough, the content of the counterattack is slightly pale, and the necessary response to the other party's language loopholes cannot be made in time. In some places, language is too absolute as to whether diligence is more important or method is more important. I believe it will be better if we can hold each other's views without denying them, which needs to be strengthened in the future.
Personally, I think positive three debates and negative three debates are better in expressing debate, asking questions and giving full play to free debate.
Having said that, I must give today's evaluation to the chairman for announcement. Thank you! (Applause)
PRESIDENT: Thank you for your advice. After careful consideration, the judges agreed by a majority, and the winners were: 1 (2) class and 1 (3) class United. (Applause)