It seems that many resumes don't need this item. If you must fill it out, think about whether you have won an award in academic research or published an article in any journal or magazine. If there is, fill it in. If no, no, just write no.
Question 2: How to fill in the academic achievements, what projects have you participated in, and what level (such as 973,863, National Natural Science Foundation, etc.). ), and in what capacity are you involved (in charge? The number of completers, etc. ).
What level of magazines (such as SCI) have you published? What are they? Which author?
What patents have you applied for?
What books have you written and which authors?
What are the important academic awards? (such as national, provincial and ministerial awards, etc.). )
Question 3: How to fill in the "academic research achievements" in your resume? You can fill out the published papers yourself, or you can do projects and experiments with your tutor.
Question 4: How to write a list of major scientific research achievements, academic papers or works (translations)? Should I print out my papers, or just list the projects I have participated in and the papers I have written? View original post >>
Question 5: How to write a brief introduction of technical achievements? The so-called scientific and technological achievements refer to the knowledge products with some recognized academic or economic value obtained by people through complex intellectual labor in scientific and technological activities. China Academy of Sciences defines the meaning of scientific and technological achievements in the Measures for the Administration of Scientific and Technological Research Achievements of China Academy of Sciences as: the achievements of a scientific and technological research subject that have certain academic or practical significance through observation experiments, research and trial production or dialectical thinking activities. Scientific and technological achievements are divided into basic research achievements, applied research achievements and development work achievements according to the nature of research;
Turn left | turn right
The dying brother の 359 | was published on 20 16-05-27 0 1:23.
comment
1 0
20 1 1-20 12 world major scientific and technological achievements in life sciences and medicine 1. Breakthroughs have been made in the research and development of anti-malaria and anti-cancer vaccines. About 780,000 people worldwide die of malaria every year. After 24 years of research, British scientists have discovered an antimalarial vaccine. The third-phase efficacy trial conducted in seven African countries this year has finally proved to be very successful, with an effective rate of about 56% for infants aged 5- 17 months. It is estimated that the vaccine will enter the market as early as 20 15. In February, 65438, scientists developed a vaccine against 70% fatal cancers, which can reduce the breast cancer lump by 80%. 2. The research of human organ tissue regeneration has also achieved fruitful results. In March this year, American researchers successfully created the human urethra. After the doctor implanted it into the patient, the urethra cultured in vitro really began to work normally. At the beginning of April, Japanese researchers used embryonic stem cells of experimental mice to artificially cultivate the embryonic structure of retina, which is the most complex physiological tissue artificially cultivated so far. In mid-April, British scientists cultivated human kidneys in the laboratory from human amniotic fluid and animal embryonic cells. This breakthrough is expected to enable patients who need organ transplantation to cultivate their organs as needed and avoid the risk of rejection during transplantation. 3.65438+A new study published in early February found that although there is an upper limit of human IQ, the latest brain functional magnetic resonance imaging research shows that some people's brain activity patterns can be changed by transmitting signals, and knowledge can be "lured" through the visual cortex. When learning a new skill in the future, people just need to sit in front of the computer monitor and wait for the technology to be "downloaded" into their brains. Astrophysics iv. Found too much ...
Question 6: How to write an academic resume? As the name implies, focus on your academic achievements. First, introduce your basic situation and personal information, then your study experience, and then focus on your tutor, study team, research topics and awards.
Question 7: What is "academic contribution"? People often complain or blame themselves, saying that the school of management is chaotic and the department of sociology is chaotic, while those who engage in philosophy are haggle over every ounce and engage in psychological counseling. Having said that, people often judge a school of management not by its good management; The measure of a sociology department is often not whether the department is harmonious and United. Russell described Leibniz's character very tacky, but this did not prevent him from saying that "Leibniz is a great wise man, unparalleled throughout the ages". Freud also admitted to others that he could not diagnose his mental illness. After all, it is generally believed that the standard to measure the value of a scholar is his or her academic contribution, that is, the achievements of academic research and innovation-papers, monographs, research reports, design schemes, etc. , not his or her personal qualities, lifestyle and working style. Of course, this view is not without objection. There are always different opinions about the relationship between a scholar's "merit" and "character". Relatively speaking, as a subject that depends on the author's intuition and belief, "works" will rely more on "character". But as Leibniz, Schopenhauer, Heidegger and other examples show, even in philosophy, "great works" and "small character" may coexist, especially if we have a moralistic understanding of "character". Similarly, we can indeed find some examples to illustrate that a poorly managed school of management can also be good, and a fragmented sociology department can also be good. In this regard, we might as well say that the academic contribution of scholars lies in the work results, not in the working methods. But think about it, if what we call "work style" not only refers to the administrative management of institutions and interpersonal communication of colleagues, but also includes how scholars ask questions, study and discuss problems, write papers, publish papers and evaluate papers, we will find that the relationship between "work style" and "work performance" is not only an external relationship, but also the academic contribution that scholars can make is not limited to academic performance. A school of management, no matter how chaotic its management is, is not bad as long as it is not busy writing articles, does not encourage low-level repetition, does not tolerate plagiarism and does not sell diplomas. The process of knowledge formation includes all links, and their respective meanings are inseparable from their relationships. Whether the same viewpoint is obtained through reasonable research and argumentation not only determines whether this achievement can be trusted by people, thus playing its due role in knowledge development and social life, but also determines whether it can condense and embody the necessary conditions for knowledge progress, so whether these conditions can be preserved and transmitted through its preservation and transmission. Before the mid-Ming Dynasty, China's scientific and technological achievements were ahead of the world, but the process and conditions of these achievements were not ahead of the world accordingly, so it was unsustainable and fell behind others. The relationship between the process and achievements of scientific research is an important content of Yan Fu's so-called "using western learning". The formation of scholars' working methods or knowledge is also very important, because scientific research activities are not only a social activity, but also an important social activity, which is becoming more and more important in modern society and knowledge society. The scientific research process includes various aspects, including individual research of scholars, the relationship between scholars and peers, and academic evaluation of academic achievements. Whether the research process of individual scholars is reasonable and creative reflects the quality and state of individual scholars, who are not only members of society, but also important members of society. Similarly, the academic relationship between scholars and peers is not only a part of the cooperative relationship between the members of the whole society, but also an important part of this cooperative relationship; The academic evaluation level is not only a side of the whole social justice level, but also an important side of this level. When scholars turn a blind eye to carelessness, roughness, even fighting and cheating, how much hope do we have to improve society? Therefore, as far as humanities and social sciences are concerned, while emphasizing that they are "equally important" with natural sciences, we should also add that the process, procedures and methods of knowledge generation are also "equally important". Considering that the research of humanities and social sciences is an integral part of its research object, that most of the research of humanities and social sciences uses natural language that the public can understand, and that scholars of humanities and social sciences are often intellectuals facing the public, we might as well say that compared with the knowledge generation process of natural sciences, the knowledge generation process of philosophy and social sciences is related to social life. & gt
Question 8: Introduction of academic and scientific research achievements Peng Jianbing has successively presided over the National Natural Science Foundation, 973 and other major scientific research projects. He has published 7 academic monographs in science press and other publishing houses, including 4 first authors, and published more than 30 papers/kloc-0 in academic journals such as Science Bulletin, Journal of Engineering Geology and Seismogeology. He has successively won the second prize of National Science and Technology Progress Award 1 item (20 12) and four first prizes, two second prizes and two third prizes of provincial and ministerial scientific and technological achievements. Recruit graduate students majoring in earthquake engineering and regional stability, rock mass engineering and geological disaster prevention. Recruit doctoral students in major engineering fields such as stability, rock mass engineering, geological disaster prevention and control, and urban engineering geology.
Question 9: How to write an academic summary 1? The principles of writing research papers discussed in this part can be applied to all types of research topics, reports, papers and dissertations, and their writing processes are similar. The general steps of preparing a research paper are (1) selecting a topic, (2) preparing reference materials, (3) collecting materials, (4) outlining, (5) writing a draft, and (6) preparing a final draft. Of course, the writing of research papers does not have to be in strict order. You can walk back and forth or do two steps at the same time. The topic of 1. 1 involves an overview of the subject field, the limitation and narrowing of the topic, and the topic as a statement of problems or assumptions. In the process of doing research, you will perfect all the decisions and conceive one or more first draft sentences. 1. 1. 1 Overview of subject areas Sometimes a tutor will designate a wide field to study. The tutor may designate a topic, list some possible topics, or let the author choose a topic freely in a wide range of fields. Once this task is announced, you should start thinking about the possible theme of this paper. If graduate students can start collecting possible series of thesis topics at the early stage of study, they can choose some graduate courses that are beneficial to the knowledge needed for these topics and try their own ideas in the report or thesis of the research group. Even in some mature fields studied by other scholars, we can often find the possibility of further research. Scholars sometimes hint at areas that have not been discussed or solved in their work, and this information usually appears in comments. Sometimes, usually listed but unconfirmed conclusions, or new methods to test basic assumptions will provide research on this topic. Thinking about the technical terms in your topic can produce innovative ways to explain it and even give it a new definition. Contradictions or splits between different books on the same subject can also produce possible topics. The current published books or the development of the current direction can provide a new understanding of ontology, thus creating opportunities for in-depth research. 1. 1.2 definition once you decide on a topic, you should consider the following factors: your interest in the topic, your ability (especially if the topic is controversial), the time to complete the task, etc. Estimate the possibility according to the following criteria: importance and interest, operability and available resources. You must not want to open a topic that you are not interested in, which is meaningless, unrealistic and impossible to complete the task within the specified time. Importance and interest are natural, and you want to devote your time to a very important and interesting topic. To some extent, importance and interest are subjective judgments, which depend on the nature of the task and the needs of the tutor. Of course, a topic that seems to be of little use to human beings in one research field may be of great significance to experts in another field. Your tutor is convinced of the importance of your topic, and your paper should convince readers that it is really important. Sometimes, an obviously important topic, such as gun control, may not be a good topic. If a large number of public debates limit your originality, or your strong feelings will hinder you from studying opposing views, so that you can't get a fair conclusion. Operability carefully defining a topic will make your research successful. If a topic is too vague, too broad, too narrow or too professional, you will find it difficult to find enough suitable information. A topic that is too broad to give enough research direction may make you have to deal with it superficially. If a topic is too narrow, you will get insufficient information, which limits your ability to draw completely valid conclusions. If a subject is too specialized, it needs knowledge that you can't reach within the time allocated by the project. For example, you may not choose a subject that requires a lot of statistics unless you have some data background or you can consult a statistics professional. Of course, in the end, readers will judge the operability of your topic through the treatment methods you give, because a good paper depends not only on the content, but also on the scope. Available resources Even if a subject is worth studying and operable, it is not appropriate if there are no available research resources. Available resources such as the library where you work and other libraries or electronic materials will affect your choice of topics. If your research paper needs a measurement or an experiment, you must determine whether you can collect the required data within the limited time of the task. The central idea of 1. 1.3 >;
Question 10: How to write the academic value of creative practical achievements? How do creative practical achievements change people's production and life?
Application value of creative practice results